Re: [SLUG] Fedora Font Server [Was: X11 Font?]

2004-07-14 Thread Jeff Waugh
quote who=Mike MacCana

  Very few modern programs use X core fonts, or server-side font rendering
  at all anymore.
 
 So the font server can only do old-school style X core fonts, rather than
 fontconfig niftiness?

Yes. fontconfig, Xft and friends are all there to pull us out of the X core
font mess so we can actually do sane, data-aware things with fonts in every
application.

- Jeff

-- 
linux.conf.au 2005: Canberra, Australiahttp://linux.conf.au/
 
  Love never misses the chance to put the boot in. - Kelly, SLOU
-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] Fedora Font Server [Was: X11 Font?]

2004-07-13 Thread Mike MacCana
On Tue, 13 Jul 2004, Jeff Waugh wrote:

 quote who=Rob Weir

  Fedora still uses a font server by default?  Why?

So that workstations don't have to cache large amounts of fonts locally?

Why wouldn't you want to use a font server? Am I missing something?

Mike

-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] Fedora Font Server [Was: X11 Font?]

2004-07-13 Thread Mike MacCana
On Wed, 14 Jul 2004, Jeff Waugh wrote:

 quote who=Mike MacCana

  On Tue, 13 Jul 2004, Jeff Waugh wrote:
 
   quote who=Rob Weir
  
Fedora still uses a font server by default?  Why?
 
  So that workstations don't have to cache large amounts of fonts locally?
 
  Why wouldn't you want to use a font server? Am I missing something?

Thanks for the reply.

 The reason why font servers are not very useful these days is because almost
 all font rendering is done on the client side (thanks to freetype, RENDER,
 Xft, etc).

 Very few modern programs use X core fonts, or server-side font
 rendering at all anymore.

So the font server can only do old-school style X core fonts, rather than
fontconfig niftiness?

Mike

-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


[SLUG] Fedora Font Server [Was: X11 Font?]

2004-07-12 Thread Jeff Waugh
quote who=Rob Weir

 Fedora still uses a font server by default?  Why?

I asked about this a while back. Too much work/churn to change it without a
lot of obvious positive impact, I was told. They should blast a can of Free
Software monkeys on it or something.

- Jeff

-- 
linux.conf.au 2005: Canberra, Australiahttp://linux.conf.au/
 
And the only time I met George W Bush, he said to me, 'Hey Mike! Go
  find real work.' Of all people! - Michael Moore
-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] Fedora Font Server [Was: X11 Font?]

2004-07-12 Thread Glen Turner
On Tue, 2004-07-13 at 02:19, Jeff Waugh wrote:
 quote who=Rob Weir
 
  Fedora still uses a font server by default?  Why?
 
 I asked about this a while back. Too much work/churn to change it without a
 lot of obvious positive impact, I was told. They should blast a can of Free
 Software monkeys on it or something.

Having it distinct might be good for a while longer. I'm still waiting
for someone to write a font server which finds fonts via fontconfig
rather than fonts.dir files.

And, yeah, it would need to convert X font names into PS/TTF font names,
but that would be fine. The operational nightmare is having two distinct
font finding paths and two distinct font installation procedures. [1]

[1] Or more, if you use GhostScript, xpdf and OpenOffice.

-- 
Glen TurnerTel: (08) 8303 3936
Australian Academic  Research Network   www.aarnet.edu.au

-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


RE: [SLUG] Fedora Font Server [Was: X11 Font?]

2004-07-12 Thread Rowling, Jill
Just to confuse the issue, CAD packages sometimes use their own defined
fonts which are actually icons used in the application.
You copy them manually onto the workstation. In my case, the application
runs on the (Unix) server and displays to the (Linux) workstation.
If you couldn't copy them to the workstation you would have to use the X
font server on the Unix server and that would be pretty slow (double
redirection and image generation on the server).

Cheers,

Jill.

-Original Message-
From: Glen Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, 13 July 2004 11:49 AM
To: Jeff Waugh
Cc: Slug
Subject: Re: [SLUG] Fedora Font Server [Was: X11 Font?]


On Tue, 2004-07-13 at 02:19, Jeff Waugh wrote:
 quote who=Rob Weir
 
  Fedora still uses a font server by default?  Why?
 
 I asked about this a while back. Too much work/churn to change it 
 without a lot of obvious positive impact, I was told. They should 
 blast a can of Free Software monkeys on it or something.

Having it distinct might be good for a while longer. I'm still waiting for
someone to write a font server which finds fonts via fontconfig rather than
fonts.dir files.

And, yeah, it would need to convert X font names into PS/TTF font names, but
that would be fine. The operational nightmare is having two distinct font
finding paths and two distinct font installation procedures. [1]

[1] Or more, if you use GhostScript, xpdf and OpenOffice.

-- 
Glen TurnerTel: (08) 8303 3936
Australian Academic  Research Network   www.aarnet.edu.au

-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html

--
IMPORTANT NOTICES
This email (including any documents referred to in, or attached, to this
email) may contain information that is personal, confidential or the subject
of copyright or other proprietary rights in favour of Aristocrat, its
affiliates or third parties. This email is intended only for the named
addressee. Any privacy, confidence, copyright or other proprietary rights in
favour of Aristocrat, its affiliates or third parties, is not lost because
this email was sent to you by mistake.

If you received this email by mistake you should: (i) not copy, disclose,
distribute or otherwise use it, or its contents, without the consent of
Aristocrat or the owner of the relevant rights; (ii) let us know of the
mistake by reply email or by telephone (+61 2 9413 6300); and (iii) delete
it from your system and destroy all copies.

Any personal information contained in this email must be handled in
accordance with applicable privacy laws.

Electronic and internet communications can be interfered with or affected by
viruses and other defects. As a result, such communications may not be
successfully received or, if received, may cause interference with the
integrity of receiving, processing or related systems (including hardware,
software and data or information on, or using, that hardware or software).
Aristocrat gives no assurances in relation to these matters.

If you have any doubts about the veracity or integrity of any electronic
communication we appear to have sent you, please call +61 2 9413 6300 for
clarification.
-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html