Re: [SLUG] Re: Re: Debian + alsa + reiserfs + make-kpkg

2000-11-15 Thread Herbert Xu

James Wilkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This one time, at band camp, Herbert Xu said:

>>Well those who've been following the wrong advice certainly got bitten :)
>>The correct way to make sure your local packages don't get upgraded is to
>>put them on hold.

> Hold didn't work.  I tried that from dselect and dselect decided to
> override my decisions... Obviously it knew better.  As gusl suggested,

I've never seen that before.  Another way of doing is

echo "kernel-image-2.2.17 hold" | dpkg --set-selections
-- 
Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ )
Email:  Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt


-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug



Re: [SLUG] Re: Re: Debian + alsa + reiserfs + make-kpkg

2000-11-15 Thread James Wilkinson

This one time, at band camp, Herbert Xu said:

>Well those who've been following the wrong advice certainly got bitten :)
>The correct way to make sure your local packages don't get upgraded is to
>put them on hold.

Hold didn't work.  I tried that from dselect and dselect decided to
override my decisions... Obviously it knew better.  As gusl suggested,
seeting the epoch to 2: made it good.

-- 
 Sure, I subscribe to USENET, but I only get it for the articles.
(o_ '
//\
v_/_


-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug



Re: [SLUG] Re: Re: Debian + alsa + reiserfs + make-kpkg

2000-11-15 Thread Herbert Xu

Angus Lees <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> apparently herbert screwed up somewhere ;)

> roach:~> apt-cache show kernel-image-2.2.17 | grep Version:
> Version: 1:2.2.17-1

Well those who've been following the wrong advice certainly got bitten :)
The correct way to make sure your local packages don't get upgraded is to
put them on hold.

Another way is to use --flavour local.

It will be irrelevant soon when the default kernel images come with a
flavour.
-- 
Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ )
Email:  Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt


-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug



[SLUG] Re: Re: Debian + alsa + reiserfs + make-kpkg

2000-11-14 Thread Angus Lees

\begin{James Wilkinson}
> This one time, at band camp, Angus Lees said:
> >\begin{James Wilkinson}
> >> >whenever I do an apt update, my new kernel image gets dusted by the
> >> >version in the distro.
> >
> >add an epoch. ie: make-kpkg --revision 1:willow.1
> >or make your version start with a letter, so its always greater than
> >the official versions (which start with a number)
> 
> 'w' isn't a letter now?
> I was using --revision=willow.1, and they were getting beaten by
> '2.2.17-1'.

apparently herbert screwed up somewhere ;)

roach:~> apt-cache show kernel-image-2.2.17 | grep Version:
Version: 1:2.2.17-1

to quote from /usr/doc/kernel-package/README.gz,

  "I fear, though, that with the introduction of epochs in kernel
  image versions shame has entered the garden of eden, and we must
  forever use epochs to guard against forced upgrades."


ie: make it 1:willow.1, or just 9:willow.1 and be done with it.

-- 
 - Gus


-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug