[slurm-users] Re: canonical way to run longer shell/bash interactive job (instead of srun inside of screen/tmux at front-end)?

2024-02-27 Thread Chris Samuel via slurm-users

On 26/2/24 12:27 am, Josef Dvoracek via slurm-users wrote:


What is the recommended way to run longer interactive job at your systems?


We provide NX for our users and also access via JupyterHub.

We also have high priority QOS's intended for interactive use for rapid 
response, but they are capped at 4 hours (or 6 hours for Jupyter users).


All the best,
Chris

--
slurm-users mailing list -- slurm-users@lists.schedmd.com
To unsubscribe send an email to slurm-users-le...@lists.schedmd.com


[slurm-users] Re: slurm-23.11.3-1 with X11 and zram causing permission errors: error: _forkexec_slurmstepd: slurmstepd failed to send return code got 0: Resource temporarily unavailable; Requeue of Jo

2024-02-24 Thread Chris Samuel via slurm-users

On 24/2/24 06:14, Robert Kudyba via slurm-users wrote:

For now I just set it to chmod 777 on /tmp and that fixed the errors. Is 
there a better option?


Traditionally /tmp and /var/tmp have been 1777 (that "1" being the 
sticky bit, originally invented to indicate that the OS should attempt 
to keep a frequently used binary in memory but then adopted to indicate 
special handling of a world writeable directory so users can only unlink 
objects they own and not others).


Hope that helps!

All the best,
Chris
--
Chris Samuel  :  http://www.csamuel.org/  :  Berkeley, CA, USA


--
slurm-users mailing list -- slurm-users@lists.schedmd.com
To unsubscribe send an email to slurm-users-le...@lists.schedmd.com