why is valac 0.9.3-3 not in unstable? (Was: Re: [debian] Starting gsm0710muxd)

2010-07-28 Thread Timo Juhani Lindfors
Hi,

[ CC to pkg-vala-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org ]

Dr. Michael Lauer mic...@vanille-media.de writes:
 Please give fsogsmd a try. It's way faster, more stable,
 and best of all... supported by me :)

Speaking of stability. fso-gsmd requires a compiler from debian
experimental. Is there some very good reason for valac 0.9.3-3 not to
be in unstable? I'd like to know before I trust something as important
as my phone calls to it :-)

-Timo

___
Smartphones-userland mailing list
Smartphones-userland@linuxtogo.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/smartphones-userland


Re: [debian] Starting gsm0710muxd

2010-07-28 Thread Timo Juhani Lindfors

Visti Andresen ta...@talpa.dk writes:
 dbus.exceptions.DBusException: org.freesmartphone.GSM.MUX.NoChannel:
 All channels are used

Shouldn't the muxer log all channel allocations? There are four
channels, check if more than that get allocated.

-Timo

___
Smartphones-userland mailing list
Smartphones-userland@linuxtogo.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/smartphones-userland


Re: why is valac 0.9.3-3 not in unstable? (Was: Re: [debian] Starting gsm0710muxd)

2010-07-28 Thread Visti Andresen
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 17:43:10 +0300
Timo Juhani Lindfors timo.lindf...@iki.fi wrote:

 Hi,
 
 [ CC to pkg-vala-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org ]
 
 Dr. Michael Lauer mic...@vanille-media.de writes:
  Please give fsogsmd a try. It's way faster, more stable,
  and best of all... supported by me :)
 
 Speaking of stability. fso-gsmd requires a compiler from debian
 experimental. Is there some very good reason for valac 0.9.3-3 not to
 be in unstable? I'd like to know before I trust something as important
 as my phone calls to it :-)

I suppose that is why fso-gsmd is not available to my apt-get...

 
 -Timo
 
 ___
 Smartphones-userland mailing list
 Smartphones-userland@linuxtogo.org
 http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/smartphones-userland

___
Smartphones-userland mailing list
Smartphones-userland@linuxtogo.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/smartphones-userland


[debian] Starting gsm0710muxd

2010-07-27 Thread Visti Andresen
I have been having problems getting my Freerunner running Debian to
connect to the GSM network.

It seems to be caused by gsm0710muxd not running on the phone.
(After manually starting it and restarting fso-framework, zhone once
again requests the pin code and registers to the network)
.

/etc/frameworkd.conf states:

# choose your muxer, available types are: gsm0710muxd [default],
fso-abyss 
#ti_calypso_muxer = fso-abyss


My question:

Who/what is responsible for starting gsm0710muxd?

___
Smartphones-userland mailing list
Smartphones-userland@linuxtogo.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/smartphones-userland


Re: [debian] Starting gsm0710muxd

2010-07-27 Thread Timo Juhani Lindfors

Visti Andresen ta...@talpa.dk writes:
 /etc/frameworkd.conf states:
 
 # choose your muxer, available types are: gsm0710muxd [default],
 fso-abyss 
 #ti_calypso_muxer = fso-abyss

Your lines were probably wrapped?

 My question:
 
 Who/what is responsible for starting gsm0710muxd?

When fso-frameworkd tries to talk to it dbus-daemon starts it.

-Timo

___
Smartphones-userland mailing list
Smartphones-userland@linuxtogo.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/smartphones-userland