Re: Cliqz Snap
On Mon, 2016-11-14 at 17:16 -0800, Seth Arnold wrote: > On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 08:13:33AM -0600, Chris wrote: > > > > Hallo Cpollock, > > > > deine Anfrage hat den CLIQZ Support erreicht. Unser Ziel ist es, > > dir so > > schnell wie möglich zu antworten. Das wird nicht allzu lange > > dauern, > > versprochen. > > > > In der Zwischenzeit kannst du mal in unsere FAQs schauen: https://c > > liqz > > .com/support > > > > Und kennst du schon unseren Blog? Schau mal hier: https://cliqz.com > > /abo > > utus/blog > > > > Danke für deine Geduld. Wir melden uns bald wieder bei dir! > > > > Der CLIQZ Support > Here's my shot; perhaps not idiomatic but should convey the idea > well: > > Hello Cpollack, > > Your question has reached CLIQZ Support. Our goal is to answer you as > quickly as possible. That will not take long, promise. > > In the meantime, you can look in our FAQs: https://cliqz..com/support > > And do you already know our blog? Look here: > https://cliqz.com/aboutus/blog > > Thanks for your patience. We'll contact you soon! > > I've submitted a bug report on the Cliqz snap - https://bugs.launchpad. net/snappy/+bug/1641958 -- Chris KeyID 0xE372A7DA98E6705C 31.11972; -97.90167 (Elev. 1092 ft) 16:34:34 up 5 days, 21:03, 1 user, load average: 1.15, 0.85, 0.59 Ubuntu 16.04.1 LTS, kernel 4.4.0-47-generic #68-Ubuntu SMP Wed Oct 26 19:39:52 UTC 2016 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- Snapcraft mailing list Snapcraft@lists.snapcraft.io Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/snapcraft
Re: Cliqz Snap
On Mon, 2016-11-14 at 17:16 -0800, Seth Arnold wrote: > On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 08:13:33AM -0600, Chris wrote: > > > > Hallo Cpollock, > > > > deine Anfrage hat den CLIQZ Support erreicht. Unser Ziel ist es, > > dir so > > schnell wie möglich zu antworten. Das wird nicht allzu lange > > dauern, > > versprochen. > > > > In der Zwischenzeit kannst du mal in unsere FAQs schauen: https://c > > liqz > > .com/support > > > > Und kennst du schon unseren Blog? Schau mal hier: https://cliqz.com > > /abo > > utus/blog > > > > Danke für deine Geduld. Wir melden uns bald wieder bei dir! > > > > Der CLIQZ Support > Here's my shot; perhaps not idiomatic but should convey the idea > well: > > Hello Cpollack, > > Your question has reached CLIQZ Support. Our goal is to answer you as > quickly as possible. That will not take long, promise. > > In the meantime, you can look in our FAQs: https://cliqz..com/support > > And do you already know our blog? Look here: > https://cliqz.com/aboutus/blog > > Thanks for your patience. We'll contact you soon! > > Thanks Seth, guess I'll wait and see if I hear back. > -- Chris KeyID 0xE372A7DA98E6705C 31.11972; -97.90167 (Elev. 1092 ft) 19:59:06 up 5 days, 27 min, 1 user, load average: 0.31, 0.31, 0.39 Ubuntu 16.04.1 LTS, kernel 4.4.0-47-generic #68-Ubuntu SMP Wed Oct 26 19:39:52 UTC 2016 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- Snapcraft mailing list Snapcraft@lists.snapcraft.io Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/snapcraft
Re: Cliqz Snap
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 08:13:33AM -0600, Chris wrote: > Hallo Cpollock, > > deine Anfrage hat den CLIQZ Support erreicht. Unser Ziel ist es, dir so > schnell wie möglich zu antworten. Das wird nicht allzu lange dauern, > versprochen. > > In der Zwischenzeit kannst du mal in unsere FAQs schauen: https://cliqz > .com/support > > Und kennst du schon unseren Blog? Schau mal hier: https://cliqz.com/abo > utus/blog > > Danke für deine Geduld. Wir melden uns bald wieder bei dir! > > Der CLIQZ Support Here's my shot; perhaps not idiomatic but should convey the idea well: Hello Cpollack, Your question has reached CLIQZ Support. Our goal is to answer you as quickly as possible. That will not take long, promise. In the meantime, you can look in our FAQs: https://cliqz..com/support And do you already know our blog? Look here: https://cliqz.com/aboutus/blog Thanks for your patience. We'll contact you soon! signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- Snapcraft mailing list Snapcraft@lists.snapcraft.io Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/snapcraft
Re: Cliqz Snap
Le 14/11/2016 à 15:13, Chris a écrit : > On Mon, 2016-11-14 at 09:11 +0100, Didier Roche wrote: >> Le 13/11/2016 à 19:04, Chris a écrit : >>> On Sun, 2016-11-13 at 09:17 -0600, Chris wrote: On Sun, 2016-11-13 at 10:41 +0800, XiaoGuo Liu wrote: > Hi Chris, > > You may find the tips at https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/wiki > /Sec > ur > ity. You may use the command like: > > $ scmp_sys_resolver 983045 > set_tls > to find out the security violation. > > Best regards, > XiaoGuo > Thank you XiaoGuo, so in my case I have syscall=272. Running chris@localhost:~$ scmp_sys_resolver 272 unshare I've installed snappy-debug but can't seem to get any kind of output when run. Maybe I'm using the wrong commands? >>> Replying to my own post. I wasn't running the snap whenever I ran >>> >>> sudo snappy-debug.security scanlog --all-entries cliqz >>> >>> Once I executed the snap from the menu with the above running I got >>> >>> chris@localhost:~$ sudo snappy-debug.security scanlog --all-entries >>> cliqz >>> kernel.printk_ratelimit = 0 >>> = Seccomp = >>> Time: Nov 13 11:49:59 >>> Log: auid=1000 uid=1000 gid=1000 ses=3 pid=29796 comm="cliqz" >>> exe="/snap/cliqz/6/opt/CLIQZ/CLIQZ" sig=31 arch=c03e >>> 272(unshare) >>> compat=0 ip=0x7ffacd899c19 code=0x0 >>> Syscall: unshare >>> >>> So, now it seems as there is a seccomp violation stopping the snap >>> from >>> running, at least that's what it appears to me to be. Where would I >>> go >>> from here? Contact the snap author? >> Indeed, the snap author didn't set the confinement rules on his app. >> The >> snap should then be in devmode (but not published in the stable >> channel), to not create user frustration executing something which >> fails. >> >> Do you mind contacting upstream so that they work on confinement? >> Thanks! >> Didier >> > Hello Didier, do you mean to contact the author? Hey Chris, indeed, > I did go to the > support page and asked about the snap package not working and I > received the below in reply, not being able to read German I 'think' it > just points me to a link for support and their blog. > > Hallo Cpollock, > > deine Anfrage hat den CLIQZ Support erreicht. Unser Ziel ist es, dir so > schnell wie möglich zu antworten. Das wird nicht allzu lange dauern, > versprochen. > > In der Zwischenzeit kannst du mal in unsere FAQs schauen: https://cliqz > .com/support > > Und kennst du schon unseren Blog? Schau mal hier: https://cliqz.com/abo > utus/blog > > Danke für deine Geduld. Wir melden uns bald wieder bei dir! > > Der CLIQZ Support > > The support link takes me to the same place where I had said the snap > doesn't work, I didn't see anything in the blog link about the snap > package. Yeah, my little remaining knowledge of German classes leads to the same conclusion than yours. Any native speaker here to help us by any chance? :) Cheers, Didier -- Snapcraft mailing list Snapcraft@lists.snapcraft.io Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/snapcraft
Re: Cliqz Snap
On Mon, 2016-11-14 at 09:11 +0100, Didier Roche wrote: > Le 13/11/2016 à 19:04, Chris a écrit : > > > > On Sun, 2016-11-13 at 09:17 -0600, Chris wrote: > > > > > > On Sun, 2016-11-13 at 10:41 +0800, XiaoGuo Liu wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi Chris, > > > > > > > > You may find the tips at https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/wiki > > > > /Sec > > > > ur > > > > ity. You may use the command like: > > > > > > > > $ scmp_sys_resolver 983045 > > > > set_tls > > > > to find out the security violation. > > > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > XiaoGuo > > > > > > > Thank you XiaoGuo, so in my case I have syscall=272. Running > > > > > > chris@localhost:~$ scmp_sys_resolver 272 > > > unshare > > > > > > I've installed snappy-debug but can't seem to get any kind of > > > output > > > when run. Maybe I'm using the wrong commands? > > > > > Replying to my own post. I wasn't running the snap whenever I ran > > > > sudo snappy-debug.security scanlog --all-entries cliqz > > > > Once I executed the snap from the menu with the above running I got > > > > chris@localhost:~$ sudo snappy-debug.security scanlog --all-entries > > cliqz > > kernel.printk_ratelimit = 0 > > = Seccomp = > > Time: Nov 13 11:49:59 > > Log: auid=1000 uid=1000 gid=1000 ses=3 pid=29796 comm="cliqz" > > exe="/snap/cliqz/6/opt/CLIQZ/CLIQZ" sig=31 arch=c03e > > 272(unshare) > > compat=0 ip=0x7ffacd899c19 code=0x0 > > Syscall: unshare > > > > So, now it seems as there is a seccomp violation stopping the snap > > from > > running, at least that's what it appears to me to be. Where would I > > go > > from here? Contact the snap author? > Indeed, the snap author didn't set the confinement rules on his app. > The > snap should then be in devmode (but not published in the stable > channel), to not create user frustration executing something which > fails. > > Do you mind contacting upstream so that they work on confinement? > Thanks! > Didier > Hello Didier, do you mean to contact the author? I did go to the support page and asked about the snap package not working and I received the below in reply, not being able to read German I 'think' it just points me to a link for support and their blog. Hallo Cpollock, deine Anfrage hat den CLIQZ Support erreicht. Unser Ziel ist es, dir so schnell wie möglich zu antworten. Das wird nicht allzu lange dauern, versprochen. In der Zwischenzeit kannst du mal in unsere FAQs schauen: https://cliqz .com/support Und kennst du schon unseren Blog? Schau mal hier: https://cliqz.com/abo utus/blog Danke für deine Geduld. Wir melden uns bald wieder bei dir! Der CLIQZ Support The support link takes me to the same place where I had said the snap doesn't work, I didn't see anything in the blog link about the snap package. Chris -- Chris KeyID 0xE372A7DA98E6705C 31.11972; -97.90167 (Elev. 1092 ft) 08:00:28 up 4 days, 12:28, 1 user, load average: 0.16, 0.25, 0.47 Ubuntu 16.04.1 LTS, kernel 4.4.0-47-generic #68-Ubuntu SMP Wed Oct 26 19:39:52 UTC 2016 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- Snapcraft mailing list Snapcraft@lists.snapcraft.io Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/snapcraft
Re: Cliqz Snap
Le 13/11/2016 à 19:04, Chris a écrit : > On Sun, 2016-11-13 at 09:17 -0600, Chris wrote: >> On Sun, 2016-11-13 at 10:41 +0800, XiaoGuo Liu wrote: >>> Hi Chris, >>> >>> You may find the tips at https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/wiki/Sec >>> ur >>> ity. You may use the command like: >>> >>> $ scmp_sys_resolver 983045 >>> set_tls >>> to find out the security violation. >>> >>> Best regards, >>> XiaoGuo >>> >> Thank you XiaoGuo, so in my case I have syscall=272. Running >> >> chris@localhost:~$ scmp_sys_resolver 272 >> unshare >> >> I've installed snappy-debug but can't seem to get any kind of output >> when run. Maybe I'm using the wrong commands? >> > Replying to my own post. I wasn't running the snap whenever I ran > > sudo snappy-debug.security scanlog --all-entries cliqz > > Once I executed the snap from the menu with the above running I got > > chris@localhost:~$ sudo snappy-debug.security scanlog --all-entries > cliqz > kernel.printk_ratelimit = 0 > = Seccomp = > Time: Nov 13 11:49:59 > Log: auid=1000 uid=1000 gid=1000 ses=3 pid=29796 comm="cliqz" > exe="/snap/cliqz/6/opt/CLIQZ/CLIQZ" sig=31 arch=c03e 272(unshare) > compat=0 ip=0x7ffacd899c19 code=0x0 > Syscall: unshare > > So, now it seems as there is a seccomp violation stopping the snap from > running, at least that's what it appears to me to be. Where would I go > from here? Contact the snap author? Indeed, the snap author didn't set the confinement rules on his app. The snap should then be in devmode (but not published in the stable channel), to not create user frustration executing something which fails. Do you mind contacting upstream so that they work on confinement? Thanks! Didier -- Snapcraft mailing list Snapcraft@lists.snapcraft.io Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/snapcraft
Re: Cliqz Snap
On Sun, 2016-11-13 at 09:17 -0600, Chris wrote: > On Sun, 2016-11-13 at 10:41 +0800, XiaoGuo Liu wrote: > > > > Hi Chris, > > > > You may find the tips at https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/wiki/Sec > > ur > > ity. You may use the command like: > > > > $ scmp_sys_resolver 983045 > > set_tls > > to find out the security violation. > > > > Best regards, > > XiaoGuo > > > Thank you XiaoGuo, so in my case I have syscall=272. Running > > chris@localhost:~$ scmp_sys_resolver 272 > unshare > > I've installed snappy-debug but can't seem to get any kind of output > when run. Maybe I'm using the wrong commands? > Replying to my own post. I wasn't running the snap whenever I ran sudo snappy-debug.security scanlog --all-entries cliqz Once I executed the snap from the menu with the above running I got chris@localhost:~$ sudo snappy-debug.security scanlog --all-entries cliqz kernel.printk_ratelimit = 0 = Seccomp = Time: Nov 13 11:49:59 Log: auid=1000 uid=1000 gid=1000 ses=3 pid=29796 comm="cliqz" exe="/snap/cliqz/6/opt/CLIQZ/CLIQZ" sig=31 arch=c03e 272(unshare) compat=0 ip=0x7ffacd899c19 code=0x0 Syscall: unshare So, now it seems as there is a seccomp violation stopping the snap from running, at least that's what it appears to me to be. Where would I go from here? Contact the snap author? Chris > > > > On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 7:13 AM, Chris > > wrote: > > > > > > Has anyone gotten this snap to run? The install went fine AFAICT > > > but > > > when executed nothing happens. Syslog shows > > > > > > Nov 12 17:00:55 localhost /usr/lib/snapd/snapd[844]: > > > daemon.go:174: > > > DEBUG: uid=1000;@ GET /v2/snaps 31.184976ms 200 > > > > > > Nov 12 17:00:55 localhost kernel: [250160.993225] audit: > > > type=1326 > > > audit(1478991655.666:65): auid=1000 uid=1000 gid=1000 ses=3 > > > pid=10201 > > > comm="cliqz" exe="/snap/cliqz/6/opt/CLIQZ/CLIQZ" sig=31 > > > arch=c03e > > > syscall=272 compat=0 ip=0x7f5d82721c19 code=0x0 > > > > > > When executed from the cli > > > > > > chris@localhost:~$ cliqz > > > Bad system call > > > > > > -- > > > Chris > > > KeyID 0xE372A7DA98E6705C > > > 31.11972; -97.90167 (Elev. 1092 ft) > > > 16:59:51 up 2 days, 21:28, 1 user, load average: 0.32, 0.37, 0.36 > > > Ubuntu 16.04.1 LTS, kernel 4.4.0-47-generic #68-Ubuntu SMP Wed > > > Oct > > > 26 19:39:52 UTC 2016 > > > > > > -- > > > Snapcraft mailing list > > > Snapcraft@lists.snapcraft.io > > > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailm > > > an > > > /listinfo/snapcraft > > > > > > > -- > > XiaoGuo, Liu > > -- > > Snapcraft mailing list > > Snapcraft@lists.snapcraft.io > > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman > > /l > > istinfo/snapcraft > -- > Snapcraft mailing list > Snapcraft@lists.snapcraft.io > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/l > istinfo/snapcraft -- Chris KeyID 0xE372A7DA98E6705C 31.11972; -97.90167 (Elev. 1092 ft) 11:59:03 up 3 days, 16:27, 1 user, load average: 0.34, 0.18, 0.17 Ubuntu 16.04.1 LTS, kernel 4.4.0-47-generic #68-Ubuntu SMP Wed Oct 26 19:39:52 UTC 2016 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- Snapcraft mailing list Snapcraft@lists.snapcraft.io Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/snapcraft
Re: Cliqz Snap
On Sun, 2016-11-13 at 10:41 +0800, XiaoGuo Liu wrote: > Hi Chris, > > You may find the tips at https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/wiki/Secur > ity. You may use the command like: > > $ scmp_sys_resolver 983045 > set_tls > to find out the security violation. > > Best regards, > XiaoGuo > Thank you XiaoGuo, so in my case I have syscall=272. Running chris@localhost:~$ scmp_sys_resolver 272 unshare I've installed snappy-debug but can't seem to get any kind of output when run. Maybe I'm using the wrong commands? > On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 7:13 AM, Chris > wrote: > > Has anyone gotten this snap to run? The install went fine AFAICT > > but > > when executed nothing happens. Syslog shows > > > > Nov 12 17:00:55 localhost /usr/lib/snapd/snapd[844]: daemon.go:174: > > DEBUG: uid=1000;@ GET /v2/snaps 31.184976ms 200 > > > > Nov 12 17:00:55 localhost kernel: [250160.993225] audit: type=1326 > > audit(1478991655.666:65): auid=1000 uid=1000 gid=1000 ses=3 > > pid=10201 > > comm="cliqz" exe="/snap/cliqz/6/opt/CLIQZ/CLIQZ" sig=31 > > arch=c03e > > syscall=272 compat=0 ip=0x7f5d82721c19 code=0x0 > > > > When executed from the cli > > > > chris@localhost:~$ cliqz > > Bad system call > > > > -- > > Chris > > KeyID 0xE372A7DA98E6705C > > 31.11972; -97.90167 (Elev. 1092 ft) > > 16:59:51 up 2 days, 21:28, 1 user, load average: 0.32, 0.37, 0.36 > > Ubuntu 16.04.1 LTS, kernel 4.4.0-47-generic #68-Ubuntu SMP Wed Oct > > 26 19:39:52 UTC 2016 > > > > -- > > Snapcraft mailing list > > Snapcraft@lists.snapcraft.io > > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman > > /listinfo/snapcraft > > > > > -- > XiaoGuo, Liu > -- > Snapcraft mailing list > Snapcraft@lists.snapcraft.io > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/l > istinfo/snapcraft -- Chris KeyID 0xE372A7DA98E6705C 31.11972; -97.90167 (Elev. 1092 ft) 08:57:09 up 3 days, 13:25, 1 user, load average: 0.14, 0.15, 0.22 Ubuntu 16.04.1 LTS, kernel 4.4.0-47-generic #68-Ubuntu SMP Wed Oct 26 19:39:52 UTC 2016 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- Snapcraft mailing list Snapcraft@lists.snapcraft.io Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/snapcraft
Re: Cliqz Snap
Hi Chris, You may find the tips at https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/wiki/Security. You may use the command like: $ scmp_sys_resolver 983045 set_tls to find out the security violation. Best regards, XiaoGuo On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 7:13 AM, Chris wrote: > Has anyone gotten this snap to run? The install went fine AFAICT but > when executed nothing happens. Syslog shows > > Nov 12 17:00:55 localhost /usr/lib/snapd/snapd[844]: daemon.go:174: > DEBUG: uid=1000;@ GET /v2/snaps 31.184976ms 200 > > Nov 12 17:00:55 localhost kernel: [250160.993225] audit: type=1326 > audit(1478991655.666:65): auid=1000 uid=1000 gid=1000 ses=3 pid=10201 > comm="cliqz" exe="/snap/cliqz/6/opt/CLIQZ/CLIQZ" sig=31 arch=c03e > syscall=272 compat=0 ip=0x7f5d82721c19 code=0x0 > > When executed from the cli > > chris@localhost:~$ cliqz > Bad system call > > -- > Chris > KeyID 0xE372A7DA98E6705C > 31.11972; -97.90167 (Elev. 1092 ft) > 16:59:51 up 2 days, 21:28, 1 user, load average: 0.32, 0.37, 0.36 > Ubuntu 16.04.1 LTS, kernel 4.4.0-47-generic #68-Ubuntu SMP Wed Oct 26 > 19:39:52 UTC 2016 > > -- > Snapcraft mailing list > Snapcraft@lists.snapcraft.io > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/ > mailman/listinfo/snapcraft > > -- XiaoGuo, Liu -- Snapcraft mailing list Snapcraft@lists.snapcraft.io Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/snapcraft
Cliqz Snap
Has anyone gotten this snap to run? The install went fine AFAICT but when executed nothing happens. Syslog shows Nov 12 17:00:55 localhost /usr/lib/snapd/snapd[844]: daemon.go:174: DEBUG: uid=1000;@ GET /v2/snaps 31.184976ms 200 Nov 12 17:00:55 localhost kernel: [250160.993225] audit: type=1326 audit(1478991655.666:65): auid=1000 uid=1000 gid=1000 ses=3 pid=10201 comm="cliqz" exe="/snap/cliqz/6/opt/CLIQZ/CLIQZ" sig=31 arch=c03e syscall=272 compat=0 ip=0x7f5d82721c19 code=0x0 When executed from the cli chris@localhost:~$ cliqz Bad system call -- Chris KeyID 0xE372A7DA98E6705C 31.11972; -97.90167 (Elev. 1092 ft) 16:59:51 up 2 days, 21:28, 1 user, load average: 0.32, 0.37, 0.36 Ubuntu 16.04.1 LTS, kernel 4.4.0-47-generic #68-Ubuntu SMP Wed Oct 26 19:39:52 UTC 2016 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- Snapcraft mailing list Snapcraft@lists.snapcraft.io Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/snapcraft