Thanks, I will do that.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Colbeck, Andrew
Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2005 3:17 AM
To: sniffer@SortMonster.com
Subject: RE: Re[2]: [sniffer] Sniffer taking a long time?
So basically, what you are saying is that my volume is
really too low
to take advantage of the persistent sniffer (and such may actually
decrease my performance), and I should stick with the non-service
version. Is that right? That is about what I thought (without the
details of how sniffer works, I just wanted to be sure).
Well, Dan, for the inevitable rush of traffic, I'd stick with
the persistent sniffer implementation now that you have it working.
If the 2 second wait time galls you, then use your **.cfg
file and specify the
MaxPollTime: 500
value at 500 ms or whatever you'd like your maximum wait time
to be instead of 2 seconds (2000 ms).
Andrew 8)
This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For
information and (un)subscription instructions go to
http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html
This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and
(un)subscription instructions go to
http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html