[sniffer] Headers showing up in message body after switching to Mdaemon

2005-08-19 Thread Jim Matuska



I'm not sure if this is related to sniffer or 
related to Mdaemon, but just after the switch all sniffer update notifications 
have the following headers visible in the message body rather than hidden in the 
headers. I also am noticing several newsletters such as zdnets have 
headers as well in the message body. Anyone have an idea what is going on, 
I am listing what shows up in the message body below:

InSniffer update email:

X-SNF-WhiteX-MDRcpt-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]X-Rcpt-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]X-MDRemoteIP: 
216.88.36.96X-Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The ***.snf 
rule base has been updated.This is your unique rulebase and license ID. 
The authentication code for this license 
is:

From Zdnet 
Message:

X-SNF-White 
X-Lookup-Warning: MAIL lookup on 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] does not match 
206.16.1.131 X-MDRcpt-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Rcpt-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
X-MDRemoteIP: 206.16.1.131 X-Return-Path: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 



Any thoughts???

Jim Matuska Jr.Computer Tech2, CCNANez 
Perce TribeInformation Systems[EMAIL PROTECTED]






Re: [sniffer] Headers showing up in message body after switching to Mdaemon

2005-08-19 Thread Pete McNeil
On Friday, August 19, 2005, 11:22:32 AM, Jim wrote:

JM I'm not sure if this is related to sniffer or  related to
JM Mdaemon, but just after the switch all sniffer update
JM notifications  have the following headers visible in the message
JM body rather than hidden in the  headers.  I also am noticing
JM several newsletters such as zdnets have  headers as well in the
JM message body.  Anyone have an idea what is going on,  I am listing

I've heard more about this lately than ever before.

You say, after the switch --- I ask, what switch? Is this perhaps a
new bug (it acts like one in other ways).

What I know about this is that most-likely something in MDaemon that
modifies the subject header is causing this problem.

What appears to happen is that SNF add's it's headers at the end of
the existing headers in the message - most specifically, at the first
double new line. In most (perhaps all) cases this is immediately after
the subject header.

After SNF has finished, additional headers are added.

Some time after that the subject header is modified to include an
extra new line at the end. This causes all headers after the subject
to become part of the body of the message.

Hope this helps,

_M



This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and 
(un)subscription instructions go to 
http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html


Re: [sniffer] Headers showing up in message body after switching to Mdaemon

2005-08-19 Thread Jim Matuska



Pete,
The switch in question was from Imail to Mdaemon, 
so far so good other than a few misc bugs, I like the Mdaemon Sniffer 
integration much better than the declude integration. Thanks for the info, 
that was where I was leaning towards too, It's mainly an asthetic thing though, 
so I'm not too concerned.

Another unrelated issue tbut maybe you or 
someone else on this list has an idea on. I have a few instantces in 
Mdeamon where messages that are being held in the bad mail queue and are also 
returning a postmaster userunknown message if in certain instances mail is sent 
to an address including the mail server name in the address i.e. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
rather than [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 This doesn't appear to be happening on all messages(I have a [EMAIL PROTECTED]to 
@nezperce.org alias), just in some instances this is happening. 

Also Pete for some reason your message to the list got stuck in the bad 
message queue but I recieved my original post to the list. Any 
thoughts? Please cc: me direct [EMAIL PROTECTED] if you can so I don't have 
to read the response from my bad message queue when it comes from the list. 


Thank You,

Jim Matuska Jr.Computer Tech2, 
CCNANez Perce TribeInformation Systems[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Pete wrote:
I've heard more about this lately than ever 
before.

You say, "after the switch" --- I ask, what switch? 
Is this perhaps anew bug (it acts like one in other ways).

What I know about this is that most-likely 
something in MDaemon thatmodifies the subject header is causing this 
problem.

What appears to happen is that SNF add's it's 
headers at the end ofthe existing headers in the message - most 
specifically, at the firstdouble new line. In most (perhaps all) cases this 
is immediately afterthe subject header.

After SNF has finished, additional headers are 
added.

Some time after that the subject header is modified 
to include anextra "new line" at the end. This causes all headers after the 
subjectto become part of the body of the message.

Hope this helps,

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Jim Matuska 
  
  To: sniffer@SortMonster.com 
  Sent: Friday, August 19, 2005 8:22 
  AM
  Subject: [sniffer] Headers showing up in 
  message body after switching to Mdaemon
  
  I'm not sure if this is related to sniffer or 
  related to Mdaemon, but just after the switch all sniffer update notifications 
  have the following headers visible in the message body rather than hidden in 
  the headers. I also am noticing several newsletters such as zdnets have 
  headers as well in the message body. Anyone have an idea what is going 
  on, I am listing what shows up in the message body below:
  
  InSniffer update email:
  
  X-SNF-WhiteX-MDRcpt-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]X-Rcpt-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]X-MDRemoteIP: 
  216.88.36.96X-Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  The 
  ***.snf rule base has been updated.This is your unique rulebase 
  and license ID. The authentication code for this license 
  is:
  
  From Zdnet 
  Message:
  
  X-SNF-White 
  X-Lookup-Warning: MAIL lookup on 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] does not match 
  206.16.1.131 X-MDRcpt-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Rcpt-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  X-MDRemoteIP: 206.16.1.131 X-Return-Path: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  
  
  
  Any thoughts???
  
  Jim Matuska Jr.Computer Tech2, CCNANez 
  Perce TribeInformation Systems[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  
  
  


Re[2]: [sniffer] Headers showing up in message body after switching to Mdaemon

2005-08-19 Thread Pete McNeil
On Friday, August 19, 2005, 12:53:39 PM, Jim wrote:

JM Pete,
JM The switch in question was from Imail to Mdaemon,  so far so

I was almost hoping this was a switch to a new version of MDaemon
since this seems to be a new phenomena. Thanks for the data!

JM good other than a few misc bugs, I like the Mdaemon Sniffer 
JM integration much better than the declude integration.

We're hoping to go this route with other systems too-- but change is
slow. The MDaemon folks are very aggressive in seeking new
improvements :-)

snip/

JM Also Pete for some reason your message to the list got stuck
JM in the bad  message queue but I recieved my original post to the
JM list.  Any  thoughts?  Please cc: me direct [EMAIL PROTECTED] if
JM you can so I don't have  to read the response from my bad message
JM queue when it comes from the list. 

Can you check the headers for the SNF results and any other tests
which might have cause the message to get captured? There's something
there that needs to be fixed.

Thanks,

_M



This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and 
(un)subscription instructions go to 
http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html


RE: Re[2]: [sniffer] Headers showing up in message body after switching to Mdaemon

2005-08-19 Thread Alberto Santoni
Hello 

I received messages of this kind me too. Then I must understand that the
cause is MDaemon and not iMail?

Alberto

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Pete McNeil
Sent: venerdì 19 agosto 2005 20.03
To: Jim Matuska
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re[2]: [sniffer] Headers showing up in message body after switching
to Mdaemon

On Friday, August 19, 2005, 12:53:39 PM, Jim wrote:

JM Pete,
JM The switch in question was from Imail to Mdaemon,  so far so

I was almost hoping this was a switch to a new version of MDaemon
since this seems to be a new phenomena. Thanks for the data!

JM good other than a few misc bugs, I like the Mdaemon Sniffer 
JM integration much better than the declude integration.

We're hoping to go this route with other systems too-- but change is
slow. The MDaemon folks are very aggressive in seeking new
improvements :-)

snip/

JM Also Pete for some reason your message to the list got stuck
JM in the bad  message queue but I recieved my original post to the
JM list.  Any  thoughts?  Please cc: me direct [EMAIL PROTECTED] if
JM you can so I don't have  to read the response from my bad message
JM queue when it comes from the list. 

Can you check the headers for the SNF results and any other tests
which might have cause the message to get captured? There's something
there that needs to be fixed.

Thanks,

_M



This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and
(un)subscription instructions go to
http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html




This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and 
(un)subscription instructions go to 
http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html