[sniffer] Re: Address
> Some of the spammers are apparently using my email address as the sender. Any > way to defeat that or capitalize on it? I get several bounces a week from all over the > world. Ah, the American spirit at work. If you can't stop it, make money on it. ;-)> (And yes, I know that is not what you meant. At least I hope not.) John T # This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Send administrative queries to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[sniffer] Re: Address
Hello Greg, Monday, September 24, 2007, 8:10:23 PM, you wrote: > Some of the spammers are apparently using my email address as the sender. > Any way to defeat > that or capitalize on it? I get several bounces a week from all over the > world. One little thing you can do if it's not done already is to set up proper SPF records for your domains. That will at least help others skip the malware using your addresses more easily. _M -- Pete McNeil Chief Scientist, Arm Research Labs, LLC. # This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Send administrative queries to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[sniffer] Address
Some of the spammers are apparently using my email address as the sender. Any way to defeat that or capitalize on it? I get several bounces a week from all over the world. # This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Send administrative queries to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[sniffer] Re: Category idea
Hello John, Friday, September 21, 2007, 5:53:34 PM, you wrote: > I have been asked by a client to help find a way to catch headhunters and > such that attempt to recruit currant employees. I have yet to spend time on > this as it seems creating a filter in Declude for this while maintaining > low/no false positives would be some what difficult. Without looking much deeper at the content you're trying to capture, it seems to me that it would probably be difficult to create the rules for this without creating false positives. A number of generalized rules might be created -- but they would be likely to match other legitimate content. That could be tightened up a bit if there were a continuously updated corpus of content to code from -- but that data and the research team to go with it do not yet exist (at least not in a usable form that I know of). > While this is outside of what normally would be considered SPAM, I was > wondering if Message Sniffer ever considered a category for such things. This is the first time we've been approached about this kind of rule group. We can build special rule-bases on a contracting basis, but this is not something we're looking at creating as a product at this time. Hope this helps, _M -- Pete McNeil Chief Scientist, Arm Research Labs, LLC. # This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Send administrative queries to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
