RE: Re[2]: [sniffer] reporting spam in bulk

[Jonathan Hickman]

I would be interested in the script if you are willing to share.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pete McNeil
Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2005 7:50 PM
To: Matt
Subject: Re[2]: [sniffer] reporting spam in bulk


On Wednesday, January 5, 2005, 7:16:50 PM, Matt wrote:

M> Pete,

M> I've been meaning to add a link to a script from within Killer 
M> WebMail that will allow me to report things to you with a single 
M> click. If I do this, am I correct in assuming that I should just use 
M> something like CDONTS to construct a mail and place the original 
M> source as the body? If not, what would be the preferred method?

I think that should work fine for reporting spam.

M> Note that I have original D*.SMD files for everything in the range of

M> E-mails that I would consider reporting (using Declude's COPYFILE). 
M> Generally speaking, this would be a customized setup, although 
M> achievable by anyone with IMail and Declude.  The hack to KWM is just

M> some JavaScript to extract the spool data file name from my message 
M> headers that I insert (full headers must be turned on in Web mail), 
M> and this links to an ASP script on my server that handles everything 
M> else.

This all sounds like a good idea. There are likely to be a few
IMail/WebMail folks around for a while. This sounds like it's not for
the technically timid though.

Thanks,
_M



This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information
and (un)subscription instructions go to
http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html


This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and 
(un)subscription instructions go to 
http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html

RE: Re[2]: [sniffer] reporting spam in bulk

[Rick Robeson]

100's of spams a problem, LOL!

Before sniffer I was facing around 10 thousand spams a day. But then I'm
coordinating 1000's of domains, so on a per domain basis, it's actually very
small.

I think what I'll do is route a combined spam report email to a server
script which will break it down and resubmit individual messages to your
spam@ address. However, this will still be sent to you as an attachment. The
advantage is that the original header info will be in place, the
disadvantage is that you might still be ignoring messages with attachments,
right?

If you don't take spam report messages with attachments, how would you be
able to get the original internet header mail info?


Rick Robeson
getlocalnews.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Pete McNeil
Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2005 11:49 AM
To: Rick Robeson
Subject: Re[2]: [sniffer] reporting spam in bulk


On Wednesday, January 5, 2005, 1:23:59 PM, Rick wrote:

RR> It would be incredibly convenient if we could report spam emails in bulk
RR> rather than individually (i.e. select all the spam emails in outlook and
RR> then forward via one email (with all the emails as attachments to you).

RR> During this latest storm, I'm finding that I don't have time to report
100's
RR> of spam emails and just delete most of them.

RR> Any way this process can be streamlined?

Unfortunately there really is no practical way for us to break down
packages like this and deal with them efficiently.

In any case, 100's of spam sounds like a more serious problem than a
spam storm. Have you checked for other problems?

_M



This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and
(un)subscription instructions go to
http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html


This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and 
(un)subscription instructions go to 
http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html