Re: [SNMP4J] Snmp Instances

2016-09-22 Thread Frank Fock

Hi Ron,

You can do both, but with a single Snmp instance it is easier
and it will consume less resources.

Best regards,
Frank

Am 22.09.2016 um 15:12 schrieb Ronald Braswell:

Should I use an instance of Snmp for traps and one for polls each with one
transport mapping or would it be better to use one instance of Snmp with
two transport mappings -- one for port 161 and one for port 162?

Ron
___
SNMP4J mailing list
SNMP4J@agentpp.org
https://oosnmp.net/mailman/listinfo/snmp4j


--
---
AGENT++
Maximilian-Kolbe-Str. 10
73257 Koengen, Germany
https://agentpp.com
Phone: +49 7024 8688230
Fax:   +49 7024 8688231

___
SNMP4J mailing list
SNMP4J@agentpp.org
https://oosnmp.net/mailman/listinfo/snmp4j


[SNMP4J] Snmp Instances

2016-09-22 Thread Ronald Braswell
Should I use an instance of Snmp for traps and one for polls each with one
transport mapping or would it be better to use one instance of Snmp with
two transport mappings -- one for port 161 and one for port 162?

Ron
___
SNMP4J mailing list
SNMP4J@agentpp.org
https://oosnmp.net/mailman/listinfo/snmp4j