We are so used to pay no doubt to high Tec report especially those aimed(claimed) do good to our health (men) and beauty (women). I just come back from the article below. I am not convinced either ways, for inventor or the battery manufacturer. Here is a stupid question. Just think about what if it really effective? Consider winners and losers among all parties, including, consumer, inventor and manufacturer, and how each party view what they might have gain/loose. Open our mind (very wide) for a moment and have some fun speculation. Let us know were you have arrived at. YK Chan Seattle p.s. Is it fair to compare the Pulse Charger Story to another classical story about the inventors of High Gas Mileage Method (or formula) versus the car manufacturer (or is it their cousin, the oil industry?). > Negative Pulse Charge, or "Burp" Charging > http://gnv.fdt.net/~redscho/burp.html RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
