I have both (both are heli versions). Bought the JR on the way home from Polecat in June after getting a lot of good advice on 'up-grading'. Both are programmed for discus and 6 servo open class planes as well as a few electrics. Discus, in particular, requires some unique setups. The 9C Super has recently gone in for service and works great (again). It had lots of stick time (~ 2000 hrs) and needed a tune-up and a few parts swapped. The JR has about 300hrs on it and has been extensively programmed and tweaked. Both provide out-of-sight range when the receiver is properly installed.

Bottom line - I have only found a few things that one transmitter can do that the other can't. And there are work-arounds for them if you really want to do it. There may be an arcane mix out there that is unique but for discus and open class use (contest and sport flying), both systems are pretty analogous.

Of the two, I find the Futaba easier to program but that's from long familiarity (~30 years flying Futaba). JR programming is a bit more intuitive and more switches can be assigned. However, you better assign them before you begin the program set-up or the effort may be wasted. Some of the mixes are easier to set up in the JR. For instance, I wanted rudder coupling only in 'Thermal' mode and assigned that to the 3 position flight mode switch. Also in 'Launch' mode, I wanted to de-activate flaps and also assigned that function to the 3 position switch. For the 9C I have those assigned to separate switches. I suspect the newer variants of the Super will allow assigning to the 3 position switch.

In both I have landing flaps on the left slider (not on the left stick). That was easier to set up on the Futaba. The timer on the Futaba is easier to set and use. The multi-point mixes are easier on the JR. The trim-in-mode option is better in the Futaba. The flaperon trim is better in the JR.

Etc., etc.

At this point I'm leaning towards the JR for discus and the Futaba for open class and electric. Will probably keep the JR on 72 (synth) and get the 2.4 module for the Futaba. Both systems (72 and SS) appear to be fully functional for all flight modes I use.

The only things I wish each would do that they don't - recognize both positive and negative shift. Also that damn reverse polarity charge jack on the JR - re-wire that puppy as soon as you can.

Overall the JR may be a bit more flexible for discus programming but I can't see a major difference for open and/or electric. There's a lot of stuff I don't do so I'm sure various proponents of either system will disagree with this post.

- Dave R
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe 
messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email 
such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format

Reply via email to