Re: [RCSE] Majestic 110 RES from Laser Arts

2005-01-12 Thread Tord Eriksson
On Friday 07 January 2005 01.03, Kurt wrote:
 Dan,
 
 Here's a pointer to what I did to my Laser Arts wings for strengthening.
 
 http://www.ppssrc.com/carbonwing/carbonwing.html

(snip)

 If I were building a woody that required some additional strength
 to a wing I would put carbon on the bottoms of both upper and lower spars.
  The reasons are this, first, carbon fiber is stronger under tension and
 not compression.  

Doesn't really help to put it on the bottom of the upper spar, as it will 
still be in compression - the entire top spar is! Easier to sand the top of 
the spar smooth, though, if the carbon is on the bottom ...

If you add carbon it should be twice as thick on top spar than on the bottom,
due to its lower compression strength. That's how Lancair does it, too!

A thin aluminium rectangular spar, of soft aluminium, is, on the other hand, 
very strong in compression and could well be -after it surface has been 
roughened with a heavy file, or similar, be glued to a wooden spar with 
epoxy, and held in place with kevlar thread. Soft aluminium have good ageing 
characteristics, both in tension and compression, while harder qualities have 
less good in compression, and are harder to roughen as well.

 Second I would be concerned of the carbon delaminating if 
 it was on the upper surface of a spar.  The other thing that I'd consider
 doing is adding the carbon to the spars prior to assembly.  I'd even go as
 far as using a vacuum bag to apply enough consistent pressure along the
 entire surface of the spar  carbon.

I have no arguments against this - sound advice as usual!

Yours,

Tord

PS Glad to be back after a while doing other things :-)!
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
text format


Re: [RCSE] Majestic 110 RES from Laser Arts

2005-01-06 Thread Bob Vixie



Dan,

Here's a pointer to what I did to my Laser Arts 
wings for strengthening.

http://www.ppssrc.com/carbonwing/carbonwing.html

Bob

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Dan 
  To: soaring@airage.com 
  Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2005 6:21 
  PM
  Subject: [RCSE] Majestic 110" RES from 
  Laser Arts
  
  
  Fellow 
  fliers,
  
  I'm 
  looking to build a RES ship to fly in our local club contests. While doing a 
  Google search, I ran across the Majestic 110" RES from Laser 
  Arts.
  
  Question: has anyone had any experience with this kit - 
  pros or cons? Flying 
  characteristics?
  
  ThanksDan 
  
  
  Do you Yahoo!?The all-new My Yahoo! – 
  What will yours do?


Re: [RCSE] Majestic 110 RES from Laser Arts

2005-01-06 Thread Kurt W. Zimmerman
Dan,

Here's a pointer to what I did to my Laser Arts wings for strengthening.

http://www.ppssrc.com/carbonwing/carbonwing.html

Bob


Greetings guys
There has been a lot of discussion on this reflector about how and
where one should attach carbon onto spars to make them effective.  


If I were building a woody that required some additional strength to
a wing I would put carbon on the bottoms of both upper and lower spars.  The
reasons are this, first, carbon fiber is stronger under tension and not
compression.  Second I would be concerned of the carbon delaminating if it
was on the upper surface of a spar.  The other thing that I'd consider doing
is adding the carbon to the spars prior to assembly.  I'd even go as far as
using a vacuum bag to apply enough consistent pressure along the entire
surface of the spar  carbon.

Just throwing my 2 cents in


Kurt  


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
text format


Re: [RCSE] Majestic 110 RES from Laser Arts

2005-01-06 Thread Ed Jett
Let's assume that we are talking about spar systems where there are shear 
webs involved.  What we have is a beam in this case. If this beam is 
rectangular in shape or symmetrical about it's longitudinal centerline, then 
the top half of the spar assembly is basically in compression and the bottom 
half is basically in tension.  The highest levels of stress occur at the 
outer surfaces of the spar (i.e., the top and bottom surfaces).

It is a fact that CF (spruce, balsa, basswood, for that matter) is roughly 
twice as strong in tension than it is in compression.  It is also a fact 
that CF is by far stronger in tension AND compression than any of the other 
materials mentioned here. Thus the reason for putting the CF on the top of 
the top spar is that this is where the best use of its superior compressive 
strength can be utilized.

If the CF is put on the bottom of the top spruce (or balsa or basswood) spar 
stock, the spruce just adds weight without adding any significant strength; 
it might as well then be balsa, foam or lightweight spackle for that matter. 
You should put the material with the highest compressive strength at the 
spot where the highest compressive stress will occur and the material with 
the highest tensile strength  at the point where the highest tensile stress 
occurs.  For wing spars or other beams, this is the top and the bottom of 
the fabrication and the material that has the highest compressive strength 
and tensile strength (currently available to modelers) is CF.

The shear webbing in the spar system prevents inward buckling of the spar 
caps and the wrapping of  the spar with glass cloth, or CF tow, or Kevlar 
tow CF braid prevents the sparcaps from delaminating or buckling outward. 
Using a FG or kevlar or CF braided tube over the spar and vacuum bagged is a 
very good way of constructing a spar system.  Since, I don't have a 
Vacbagging system, I have to wrap my spars by hand.

Your comments about
- Original Message - 
From: Kurt W. Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Soaring@airage.com
Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2005 11:02 AM
Subject: Re: [RCSE] Majestic 110 RES from Laser Arts


Greetings guys
There has been a lot of discussion on this reflector about how and
where one should attach carbon onto spars to make them effective.
If I were building a woody that required some additional strength to
a wing I would put carbon on the bottoms of both upper and lower spars. 
The
reasons are this, first, carbon fiber is stronger under tension and not
compression.  Second I would be concerned of the carbon delaminating if it
was on the upper surface of a spar.  The other thing that I'd consider 
doing
is adding the carbon to the spars prior to assembly.  I'd even go as far 
as
using a vacuum bag to apply enough consistent pressure along the entire
surface of the spar  carbon.

Just throwing my 2 cents in
Kurt
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe 
and unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note 
that subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format 
with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and 
AOL are generally NOT in text format


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


Re: [RCSE] Majestic 110 RES from Laser Arts

2005-01-06 Thread Dick Williamson
Title: Re: [RCSE] Majestic 110 RES from Laser
Arts


Dan said:

I'm looking to
build a RES ship to fly in our local club contests. While doing a
Google search, I ran across the Majestic 110 RES from Laser
Arts.

Question: has
anyone had any experience with this kit - pros or cons? Flying
characteristics?


The Majestic is a popular plane in our club and many have
appeared at our RES contests. The laser cut parts fit together
nicely. The wing takes a fair amount of work because cap strips
are used on the top and bottom of every rib. The plane, built
stock, flies quite well. It penetrates better, but doesn't float
as well as something like a Paragon. Modifications can help the
performance in several ways. Mark Drela's list of suggested
modifications is well worth implementing. They are on the
Allegro web site and in other places.

The supplied fiber glass tail boom has a fair amount of flex.
Replacing it with a tapered carbon fiber tail boom will provide more
rigidity and also save weight. The stock plane requires a fair
amount of lead in the nose ( maybe 8 oz.). The plane can be
lightened a lot by using a carbon fiber boom and making an essentially
new set of tail feathers out of lighter balsa. Getting rid of
the metal tail mounting structures also helps.

I have seen two Majestics fold their wings on winch launches.
Mark's suggestions for strengthening the spar should make the wing
nearly bulletproof.

The spoilers are fairly small for a plane this size. The
spoilers can easily be made longer spanwise.

Yaw stability and rudder authority are improved by using the
larger tail feathers suggested.

Stability and sink while circling are improved by using the
suggested modification of the polyhedral and by adding washout.
These modifications take no extra work.

Regards,

Dick




-- 

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
-
Dr. Richard C.
Williamson Phone: 781-981-7857
Room
C-317 FAX:
781-981-0122
Lincoln
Laboratory Email:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
244 Wood Street
Lexington, MA 02420-9108
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
-



[RCSE] Majestic 110 RES from Laser Arts

2005-01-05 Thread Dan

Fellow fliers,

I'm looking to build a RES ship to fly in our local club contests. While doing a Google search, I ran across the Majestic 110" RES from Laser Arts.

Question: has anyone had any experience with this kit - pros or cons? Flying characteristics?

ThanksDan 
		Do you Yahoo!? 
The all-new My Yahoo! – What will yours do?

Re: [RCSE] Majestic 110 RES from Laser Arts

2005-01-05 Thread Andrew E. Mileski
Dan wrote:
I'm looking to build a RES ship to fly in our local club contests. While 
doing a Google search, I ran across the Majestic 110 RES from Laser Arts.

Question: has anyone had any experience with this kit - pros or cons? 
 Flying characteristics?
Some info on improvements:
  http://isoar.ca/~andrewm/rc/majestic/
Check out the Alegro-Lite archives too for discussion.
--
Andrew E. Mileski
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format