Re: [ICE] random tip about array-per-array ops
I missed out on this, and wish I hadn't. It's very nifty. Would be cool if Stephen could get permission to dump it in his ICE articles, xsisupport is one of the most recurring sites when searching for anything ICE and array, and he has some rather useful repeat-dodging articles already over there. On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 12:36 AM, Dan Yargici wrote: > Just want to re-visit this thread to thank Oleg and reiterate how this is > all kinds of crazy awesome. > > Thanks! > > DAN > > > > On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 6:41 AM, Chris Chia wrote: > >> Nice compound out there... >> :D >> >> -Original Message- >> From: softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com [mailto: >> softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com] On Behalf Of Fabricio Chamon >> Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2012 10:28 PM >> To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com >> Subject: Re: [ICE] random tip about array-per-array ops >> >> Nice Vincent ! >> ...but for this task I think this method may be easier... >> > > -- Our users will know fear and cower before our software! Ship it! Ship it and let them flee like the dogs they are!
Re: [ICE] random tip about array-per-array ops
Just want to re-visit this thread to thank Oleg and reiterate how this is all kinds of crazy awesome. Thanks! DAN On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 6:41 AM, Chris Chia wrote: > Nice compound out there... > :D > > -Original Message- > From: softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com [mailto: > softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com] On Behalf Of Fabricio Chamon > Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2012 10:28 PM > To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com > Subject: Re: [ICE] random tip about array-per-array ops > > Nice Vincent ! > ...but for this task I think this method may be easier... >
RE: [ICE] random tip about array-per-array ops
Nice compound out there... :D -Original Message- From: softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com [mailto:softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com] On Behalf Of Fabricio Chamon Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2012 10:28 PM To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com Subject: Re: [ICE] random tip about array-per-array ops Nice Vincent ! ...but for this task I think this method may be easier... <>
Re: [ICE] random tip about array-per-array ops
no i got it... indeed nice one Am 27.06.2012 um 14:54 schrieb Fabricio Chamon: yes, very cool! thanks again!
Re: [ICE] random tip about array-per-array ops
"i have the gut feeling this is something amazing, but i dont understand a damn thing..." lol, me too. But I think this is a way to use "find in array" node to find arrays inside arrays. If so this is very useful indeed. Thanks for sharing Oleg! one thing I noticed when recostructing the tree: when you reach at the "find in array", be sure to first plug duplicates_array -> Array port, THEN select in array -> Value, or else you may get context mismatch.
Re: [ICE] random tip about array-per-array ops
i have the gut feeling this is something amazing, but i dont understand a damn thing... Am 27.06.2012 um 13:02 schrieb Christian Gotzinger: Ww! This looks super useful, and I've been wanting to do this kind of thing many times before. Particularly the Find in Array has made me use Repeat loops way too often. Thank you for discovering and sharing! On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 5:35 PM, Oleg Bliznuk wrote: Hi list, I am digging at this time into the topic of array-per-array operations without while\repeat nodes and trying to avoid building a custom node for each op that I perform, so I have found one handy tip how to perform some of these op - we can only use Generate Sample set ( witout any geo on input ) in any place with exact count of required element to select data from first ( or second ) array and do something with it, thus we can get a set-context without generating a real geometry ( and as I understood we also involve multithreading this way ). I hope this can help someone. regards, Oleg
Re: [ICE] random tip about array-per-array ops
Ww! This looks super useful, and I've been wanting to do this kind of thing many times before. Particularly the Find in Array has made me use Repeat loops way too often. Thank you for discovering and sharing! On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 5:35 PM, Oleg Bliznuk wrote: > Hi list, > I am digging at this time into the topic of array-per-array operations > without while\repeat nodes and trying to avoid building a custom node for > each op that I perform, so I have found one handy tip how to perform some > of these op - we can only use Generate Sample set ( witout any geo on input > ) in any place with exact count of required element to select data from > first ( or second ) array and do something with it, thus we can get a > set-context without generating a real geometry ( and as I understood we > also involve multithreading this way ). I hope this can help someone. > regards, > Oleg >