Re: OT: Re: Multiple objects copy

[Jonathan Moore]

Thanks Jason. It's certainly going to be a challenge but at least most of
my data was backed up. Unfortunately much of the music equipment will be
hard to replace even with a full insurance payout. Onwards though,
otherwise that way madness lies!

On 26 September 2017 at 00:12, Jason S  wrote:

> On 09/25/17 11:52, Jonathan Moore wrote:
>
> Fire wiped out my studio - lost a lot of vintage synth hardware, to go
> along with my workstations and the insurance company a proving to be an
> upward battle.
>
>
> Wow that's nuts.
>
> I hope you didn't loose any data (or other irreplaceable things) along
> with those synths
> and I hope you get cool new hardware out of your misfortune,
> (and anything else that insurance are suppose to cover in those very
> circumstances)
>
> best of luck,
> J
>
> On 09/25/17 11:52, Jonathan Moore wrote:
>
> That looks like excellent performance Oliver.
>
> I've been using the new 'for each' compiled sop methodology for copy
> stamping (in those limited situations where the SOP's are compilable) and
> have been happy with the speed of the results but can't say I've been
> measuring.
>
> The bit that bugs me at the moment about compiled SOP loops is that
> there's very little in the world of procedural modeling that's compilable,
> because so many key modelling SOP's have yet to be 'verbified' (or upgraded
> to SOP 2.0 to give it it's other SIdeFX nomenclature). The promise is there
> but at the moment there's limited use case scenarios for compiled SOPs
> outside of destruction.
>
> I'll have a dig into your file when I'm back up and running as it looks
> very promising. Fire wiped out my studio - lost a lot of vintage synth
> hardware, to go along with my workstations and the insurance company a
> proving to be an upward battle. G!
>
>
>
> --
> Softimage Mailing List.
> To unsubscribe, send a mail to softimage-requ...@listproc.autodesk.com
> with "unsubscribe" in the subject, and reply to confirm.
>
--
Softimage Mailing List.
To unsubscribe, send a mail to softimage-requ...@listproc.autodesk.com with 
"unsubscribe" in the subject, and reply to confirm.

OT: Re: Multiple objects copy

[Jason S]

  
  
On 09/25/17 11:52, Jonathan Moore
  wrote:
  Fire wiped out my studio - lost a lot of vintage synth
hardware, to go along with my workstations and the insurance
company a proving to be an upward battle.
  
  
  Wow that's nuts.   
  
  I hope you didn't loose any data (or other irreplaceable things)
  along with those synths
  and I hope you get cool new hardware out of your misfortune, 
  (and anything else that insurance are suppose to cover in those
  very circumstances)
  
  best of luck,
  J
  
  On 09/25/17 11:52, Jonathan Moore wrote:


  That looks like excellent performance Oliver.


I've been using the new 'for each' compiled sop methodology
  for copy stamping (in those limited situations where the SOP's
  are compilable) and have been happy with the speed of the
  results but can't say I've been measuring.


The bit that bugs me at the moment about compiled SOP loops
  is that there's very little in the world of procedural
  modeling that's compilable, because so many key modelling
  SOP's have yet to be 'verbified' (or upgraded to SOP 2.0 to
  give it it's other SIdeFX nomenclature). The promise is there
  but at the moment there's limited use case scenarios for
  compiled SOPs outside of destruction.


I'll have a dig into your file when I'm back up and running
  as it looks very promising. Fire wiped out my studio - lost a
  lot of vintage synth hardware, to go along with my
  workstations and the insurance company a proving to be an
  upward battle. G!
  
  


  

--
Softimage Mailing List.
To unsubscribe, send a mail to softimage-requ...@listproc.autodesk.com with 
"unsubscribe" in the subject, and reply to confirm.