[jira] Commented: (SOLR-128) Include Newer version of Jetty
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-128?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12499407 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-128: --- Switching to the non-NIO connector in Jetty 6.1.3, I get 18.2s for persistent connections, 35s for non-persistent (again WinXP, Java5 -server) Include Newer version of Jetty -- Key: SOLR-128 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-128 Project: Solr Issue Type: Improvement Components: update Reporter: Ryan McKinley Assigned To: Ryan McKinley Priority: Minor Attachments: jetty-6.3-example.zip, Jetty6.config.patch, lib.zip, start.jar It would be good to include an up-to-date jetty version for the example. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Commented: (SOLR-128) Include Newer version of Jetty
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-128?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12499409 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-128: --- The 10,000 single-client connection test on a dual Opteron, RHEL4 64 bit, Java5 64 bit -server Jetty 6.1.3, NIO connector, persistent=414s, non-persistent=11.3s Jetty 6.1.3, non-NIO connector, persistent=408s, non-persistent=10.2s Situation reversed from WinXP! The persistent connections are horribly slow. Include Newer version of Jetty -- Key: SOLR-128 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-128 Project: Solr Issue Type: Improvement Components: update Reporter: Ryan McKinley Assigned To: Ryan McKinley Priority: Minor Attachments: jetty-6.3-example.zip, Jetty6.config.patch, lib.zip, start.jar It would be good to include an up-to-date jetty version for the example. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Commented: (SOLR-128) Include Newer version of Jetty
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-128?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12499413 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-128: --- On that Opteron Linux box, almost identical numbers for Resin 3.0 pro, so it's not Jetty specific. Include Newer version of Jetty -- Key: SOLR-128 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-128 Project: Solr Issue Type: Improvement Components: update Reporter: Ryan McKinley Assigned To: Ryan McKinley Priority: Minor Attachments: jetty-6.3-example.zip, Jetty6.config.patch, lib.zip, start.jar It would be good to include an up-to-date jetty version for the example. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Commented: (SOLR-128) Include Newer version of Jetty
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-128?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12499364 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-128: --- Doing some quick connection handling tests with the python client: from solr import * c = SolrConnection(host='localhost:8080', persistent=False) for i in xrange(1): c.search(q='id:1234' Java 1.5 -server on WindowsXP Jetty 5.1.??, persistent=20.9s, non-persistent=44s, sometimes address already in use exception Jetty 6.1.3, persistent=20.1s, non-persistent=114s Tomcat 6.0.13, persistent=20.2s, non-persistent=29s, sometimes address already in use exception Could be a python client issue, (SO_REUSE_ADDR for python http-lib?), but it does seem like Jetty 6.1.3 is slower at handling new connections? Anyone have benchmarks from a different client? Include Newer version of Jetty -- Key: SOLR-128 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-128 Project: Solr Issue Type: Improvement Components: update Reporter: Ryan McKinley Assigned To: Ryan McKinley Priority: Minor Attachments: jetty-6.3-example.zip, Jetty6.config.patch, lib.zip, start.jar It would be good to include an up-to-date jetty version for the example. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Commented: (SOLR-128) Include Newer version of Jetty
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-128?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12498729 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-128: --- Yeah, I saw that hadoop issue too, which is why I was planning on some quick indexing querying benchmarks. Include Newer version of Jetty -- Key: SOLR-128 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-128 Project: Solr Issue Type: Improvement Components: update Reporter: Ryan McKinley Assigned To: Ryan McKinley Priority: Minor Attachments: jetty-6.3-example.zip, Jetty6.config.patch, lib.zip, start.jar It would be good to include an up-to-date jetty version for the example. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Commented: (SOLR-128) Include Newer version of Jetty
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-128?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12498335 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-128: --- OK, let's quickly go ahead then. There have been some JSP issues with our current Jetty version anyway. I'd like to have all the core changes done in the next few days so we can get a release out by the end of this month (1 week away). Include Newer version of Jetty -- Key: SOLR-128 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-128 Project: Solr Issue Type: Improvement Components: update Reporter: Ryan McKinley Priority: Minor Attachments: jetty-6.3-example.zip, Jetty6.config.patch, lib.zip, start.jar It would be good to include an up-to-date jetty version for the example. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Commented: (SOLR-128) Include Newer version of Jetty
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-128?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12470960 ] Otis Gospodnetic commented on SOLR-128: --- I think we want to wait with the newest Jetty. I'm on the jetty ML, and the beast is not yet fully ironed out., not yet stable enough. I'd let it simmer a little longer while Greg, Jan and other Jetty folks get the deamons out. Include Newer version of Jetty -- Key: SOLR-128 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-128 Project: Solr Issue Type: Improvement Components: update Reporter: Ryan McKinley Priority: Minor Attachments: Jetty6.config.patch, lib.zip, start.jar It would be good to include an up-to-date jetty version for the example. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Commented: (SOLR-128) Include Newer version of Jetty
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-128?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12468660 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-128: --- BTW, there's a Jetty 6.1.1 out... Include Newer version of Jetty -- Key: SOLR-128 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-128 Project: Solr Issue Type: Improvement Components: update Reporter: Ryan McKinley Priority: Minor Attachments: Jetty6.config.patch, lib.zip, start.jar It would be good to include an up-to-date jetty version for the example. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Commented: (SOLR-128) Include Newer version of Jetty
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-128?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12468746 ] Ryan McKinley commented on SOLR-128: Ideally we could replace existing JSP with servlets or SolrRequestHandlers. I don't see anything that could not be handled using a SolrRequestHandler and default wt=xslt. For an embedded solr, it would be nice not to need the JSP dependencies. This would have the added bennefit of returning XML/JSON/ruby/etc for the admin interface. Jetty 6.1.1? where is it? Its not on: http://docs.codehaus.org/display/JETTY/Downloading+and+Installing#download Include Newer version of Jetty -- Key: SOLR-128 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-128 Project: Solr Issue Type: Improvement Components: update Reporter: Ryan McKinley Priority: Minor Attachments: Jetty6.config.patch, lib.zip, start.jar It would be good to include an up-to-date jetty version for the example. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Commented: (SOLR-128) Include Newer version of Jetty
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-128?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12468750 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-128: --- The disad to getting rid of JSPs is it would make it much harder for someone to easily improve the look or functionality of the admin pages. Include Newer version of Jetty -- Key: SOLR-128 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-128 Project: Solr Issue Type: Improvement Components: update Reporter: Ryan McKinley Priority: Minor Attachments: Jetty6.config.patch, lib.zip, start.jar It would be good to include an up-to-date jetty version for the example. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Commented: (SOLR-128) Include Newer version of Jetty
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-128?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12468749 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-128: --- When you go to the download link: http://dist.codehaus.org/jetty/ Include Newer version of Jetty -- Key: SOLR-128 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-128 Project: Solr Issue Type: Improvement Components: update Reporter: Ryan McKinley Priority: Minor Attachments: Jetty6.config.patch, lib.zip, start.jar It would be good to include an up-to-date jetty version for the example. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
Re: [jira] Commented: (SOLR-128) Include Newer version of Jetty
: : The disad to getting rid of JSPs is it would make it much harder for : someone to easily improve the look or functionality of the admin pages. look could be improved with XSLT in most cases yes/no? ... as for functionality ... it's not like we are leveraging a lot of JSP code siplcations -- we dont' have extensive taglibs or anything making our JSPs easy for novices to understand -- you pretty much have to know Java to change them right now, and you have to have a JDK installed on our box to test your JSP changes ... so why not make them RequestHandlers? -Hoss
[jira] Commented: (SOLR-128) Include Newer version of Jetty
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-128?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12468758 ] Ryan McKinley commented on SOLR-128: I'm not suggesting we drop JSP *now*... just that we definitely should not be using 2.1 specific stuff and where possible xml+xslt with a RequestHandler (SOLR-58) in the future. I just tried this with 6.1.1 and it works fine (with the jsp-2.0 or jsp-2.1) What is the best way for me to post this patch? Most of the work is adding and deleting jar files. It has two xml config files etc/jetty.xml and etc/webdefault.xml Include Newer version of Jetty -- Key: SOLR-128 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-128 Project: Solr Issue Type: Improvement Components: update Reporter: Ryan McKinley Priority: Minor Attachments: Jetty6.config.patch, lib.zip, start.jar It would be good to include an up-to-date jetty version for the example. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
