[jira] Commented: (SOLR-255) RemoteSearchable for Solr(use RMI)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-255?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12516107
]
Stu Hood commented on SOLR-255:
---
Everyone working on this patch should check out
http://lucene.zones.apache.org:8080/hudson/job/Lucene-Nightly/javadoc/org/apache/lucene/search/ParallelMultiSearcher.html
and make sure no work is being duplicated. My company is using
'ParallelMultiSearcher' in a production environment with great success, so I
wanted to make it is on everyone's radar.
Thanks!
> RemoteSearchable for Solr(use RMI)
> --
>
> Key: SOLR-255
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-255
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: search
>Reporter: Toru Matsuzawa
> Attachments: solr-multi20070606.zip, solr-multi20070724..zip
>
>
> I experimentally implemented RemoteSearchable of Lucene for Solr.
> I referred to "FederatedSearch" and used RMI.
> Two or more Searchers can be referred to with SolrIndexSearcher.
> These query-only indexes can be specified in solrconfig.xml,
> enumerating the list under a tag.
>
> E:\sample\data1
> E:\sample\data2
> rmi://localhost
>
> The index in the dataDir is also used as the default index of solr
> to update and query.
> When data of a document in a index specified under the is
> updated,
> that document data in the index will be deleted and data of the updated
> document will be stored
> in the index in the dataDir.
> SolrRemoteSearchable (the searcher for remote access) is started from
> SolrCore
> by specifying "< remoteSearcher>true" in solrconfig.xml.(It
> is registered in RMI. )
> ("-Djava.security.policy" should be set when you start VM. )
> Not all of the operational cases are tested
> because Solr has so many features.
> Moreover, TestUnit has not been made
> because I made this through a trial and error process.
> Some changes are required in Lucene to execute this.
> I need your comments on this although it might be hard without TestUnit.
> I especially worry about the followings:
> - Am I on the right truck about this issue?
> - Is the extent of modifying Lucene tolerable?
> - Are there any ideas to implement this feature without modifying Lucene?
> - Does this idea contribute for improving Solr?
> - This implementation may partially overlap with "Multiple Solr Cores".
> What should be done?
> - Are there any other considerations about this issue, which I have
> overlooked?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Commented: (SOLR-255) RemoteSearchable for Solr(use RMI)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-255?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12510637
]
Sharad Agarwal commented on SOLR-255:
-
Toru, Along with the query processing, RequestHandlers also add more info to
response, like 'highlighting' and 'moreLikeThis' information. I am not clear
how this get accomplished in the distributed environment?
Collecting Highlighting info for all top N records from all shards could be
quite expensive. How about first combining the results from shards and then
gathering Highlighting info?
> RemoteSearchable for Solr(use RMI)
> --
>
> Key: SOLR-255
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-255
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: search
>Reporter: Toru Matsuzawa
> Attachments: solr-multi20070606.zip
>
>
> I experimentally implemented RemoteSearchable of Lucene for Solr.
> I referred to "FederatedSearch" and used RMI.
> Two or more Searchers can be referred to with SolrIndexSearcher.
> These query-only indexes can be specified in solrconfig.xml,
> enumerating the list under a tag.
>
> E:\sample\data1
> E:\sample\data2
> rmi://localhost
>
> The index in the dataDir is also used as the default index of solr
> to update and query.
> When data of a document in a index specified under the is
> updated,
> that document data in the index will be deleted and data of the updated
> document will be stored
> in the index in the dataDir.
> SolrRemoteSearchable (the searcher for remote access) is started from
> SolrCore
> by specifying "< remoteSearcher>true" in solrconfig.xml.(It
> is registered in RMI. )
> ("-Djava.security.policy" should be set when you start VM. )
> Not all of the operational cases are tested
> because Solr has so many features.
> Moreover, TestUnit has not been made
> because I made this through a trial and error process.
> Some changes are required in Lucene to execute this.
> I need your comments on this although it might be hard without TestUnit.
> I especially worry about the followings:
> - Am I on the right truck about this issue?
> - Is the extent of modifying Lucene tolerable?
> - Are there any ideas to implement this feature without modifying Lucene?
> - Does this idea contribute for improving Solr?
> - This implementation may partially overlap with "Multiple Solr Cores".
> What should be done?
> - Are there any other considerations about this issue, which I have
> overlooked?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Commented: (SOLR-255) RemoteSearchable for Solr(use RMI)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-255?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12510631
]
Toru Matsuzawa commented on SOLR-255:
-
Hi Yonik,
SolrMultiSearcher execute searches in each index file.
Index files to be searched is as follows:
- /data/index (default index files, read/write)
- local index files (read only)
- remote index files through RMI (read only)
SolrIndexSearchable performs searches in local indexes,
which originally SolrIndexSearcher performs.
SolrClientSearchable is executed as the wrapper instance
which gets a RMI object and performs searches
In SolrMultiSearcher, SolrFieldSortedHitQueue merged search results
from all searched indexes.
(FieldSortedHitQueue cannot use here
because it requires using FieldCache.)
When RMI is valid, the following data are transferred through the network.
1) Weight, DocSet, Sort and so on, for search requests to remote indexes
2) DocListAndSet , DocList or DocSet as these search results
3) FieldCache of each field from remote indexes
With getInts(field), getFloats(field) and so on,
SolrMultiSearcher merges all these data,
which SolrIndexSearchable or SolrClientSearchable for each index gets
with getInts(field), getFloats(field) and so on.
There will be certain problems on scalability unless something should be done
for this point.（Please teach if there is something a good idea. )
Each index is searched sequentially in my present implementation.
This process should be in parallel in future implementation. (It must be hard
to implement.)
My implementation is mainly in order to search indexes on remote nodes through
RMI.
Without RMI (i.e., local index searches only), my implementation can be more
simple.
(I have originally implemented this for its remote index use in my project.
However, I use Solr with local indexes only because of complex operations of
remote index version.)
Thanks,
> RemoteSearchable for Solr(use RMI)
> --
>
> Key: SOLR-255
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-255
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: search
>Reporter: Toru Matsuzawa
> Attachments: solr-multi20070606.zip
>
>
> I experimentally implemented RemoteSearchable of Lucene for Solr.
> I referred to "FederatedSearch" and used RMI.
> Two or more Searchers can be referred to with SolrIndexSearcher.
> These query-only indexes can be specified in solrconfig.xml,
> enumerating the list under a tag.
>
> E:\sample\data1
> E:\sample\data2
> rmi://localhost
>
> The index in the dataDir is also used as the default index of solr
> to update and query.
> When data of a document in a index specified under the is
> updated,
> that document data in the index will be deleted and data of the updated
> document will be stored
> in the index in the dataDir.
> SolrRemoteSearchable (the searcher for remote access) is started from
> SolrCore
> by specifying "< remoteSearcher>true" in solrconfig.xml.(It
> is registered in RMI. )
> ("-Djava.security.policy" should be set when you start VM. )
> Not all of the operational cases are tested
> because Solr has so many features.
> Moreover, TestUnit has not been made
> because I made this through a trial and error process.
> Some changes are required in Lucene to execute this.
> I need your comments on this although it might be hard without TestUnit.
> I especially worry about the followings:
> - Am I on the right truck about this issue?
> - Is the extent of modifying Lucene tolerable?
> - Are there any ideas to implement this feature without modifying Lucene?
> - Does this idea contribute for improving Solr?
> - This implementation may partially overlap with "Multiple Solr Cores".
> What should be done?
> - Are there any other considerations about this issue, which I have
> overlooked?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Commented: (SOLR-255) RemoteSearchable for Solr(use RMI)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-255?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12508394
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-255:
---
A few other considerations for good scalability:
- shards should be searched in parallel
- there needs to be multiple copies of each shard (esp for HA), with failover,
otherwise splitting and distributing the index will lead to higher failure
rates.
> RemoteSearchable for Solr(use RMI)
> --
>
> Key: SOLR-255
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-255
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: search
>Reporter: Toru Matsuzawa
> Attachments: solr-multi20070606.zip
>
>
> I experimentally implemented RemoteSearchable of Lucene for Solr.
> I referred to "FederatedSearch" and used RMI.
> Two or more Searchers can be referred to with SolrIndexSearcher.
> These query-only indexes can be specified in solrconfig.xml,
> enumerating the list under a tag.
>
> E:\sample\data1
> E:\sample\data2
> rmi://localhost
>
> The index in the dataDir is also used as the default index of solr
> to update and query.
> When data of a document in a index specified under the is
> updated,
> that document data in the index will be deleted and data of the updated
> document will be stored
> in the index in the dataDir.
> SolrRemoteSearchable (the searcher for remote access) is started from
> SolrCore
> by specifying "< remoteSearcher>true" in solrconfig.xml.(It
> is registered in RMI. )
> ("-Djava.security.policy" should be set when you start VM. )
> Not all of the operational cases are tested
> because Solr has so many features.
> Moreover, TestUnit has not been made
> because I made this through a trial and error process.
> Some changes are required in Lucene to execute this.
> I need your comments on this although it might be hard without TestUnit.
> I especially worry about the followings:
> - Am I on the right truck about this issue?
> - Is the extent of modifying Lucene tolerable?
> - Are there any ideas to implement this feature without modifying Lucene?
> - Does this idea contribute for improving Solr?
> - This implementation may partially overlap with "Multiple Solr Cores".
> What should be done?
> - Are there any other considerations about this issue, which I have
> overlooked?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Commented: (SOLR-255) RemoteSearchable for Solr(use RMI)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-255?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12508385
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-255:
---
Toru, could you give an overview of how this solution works, what data is
passed over the network, and how well you think it scales? What is done on the
shards, and what is done on the "combiner" to sort hits by a certain field? to
facet by a certain field? Some of the methods on SolrSearchable make me
nervous about scalability (like getInts(field), getFloats(field)) but it's not
easy to tell if/when those are used.
> RemoteSearchable for Solr(use RMI)
> --
>
> Key: SOLR-255
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-255
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: search
>Reporter: Toru Matsuzawa
> Attachments: solr-multi20070606.zip
>
>
> I experimentally implemented RemoteSearchable of Lucene for Solr.
> I referred to "FederatedSearch" and used RMI.
> Two or more Searchers can be referred to with SolrIndexSearcher.
> These query-only indexes can be specified in solrconfig.xml,
> enumerating the list under a tag.
>
> E:\sample\data1
> E:\sample\data2
> rmi://localhost
>
> The index in the dataDir is also used as the default index of solr
> to update and query.
> When data of a document in a index specified under the is
> updated,
> that document data in the index will be deleted and data of the updated
> document will be stored
> in the index in the dataDir.
> SolrRemoteSearchable (the searcher for remote access) is started from
> SolrCore
> by specifying "< remoteSearcher>true" in solrconfig.xml.(It
> is registered in RMI. )
> ("-Djava.security.policy" should be set when you start VM. )
> Not all of the operational cases are tested
> because Solr has so many features.
> Moreover, TestUnit has not been made
> because I made this through a trial and error process.
> Some changes are required in Lucene to execute this.
> I need your comments on this although it might be hard without TestUnit.
> I especially worry about the followings:
> - Am I on the right truck about this issue?
> - Is the extent of modifying Lucene tolerable?
> - Are there any ideas to implement this feature without modifying Lucene?
> - Does this idea contribute for improving Solr?
> - This implementation may partially overlap with "Multiple Solr Cores".
> What should be done?
> - Are there any other considerations about this issue, which I have
> overlooked?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Commented: (SOLR-255) RemoteSearchable for Solr(use RMI)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-255?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12508380
]
Toru Matsuzawa commented on SOLR-255:
-
Hi Otis & Henri,
Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
> So with your patch one can search any *one* of those indices,
> or any *group* of those indices,
> correct? In the case where a *group* of indices is searched,
> do you search them in parallel and merge the results?
With my patch one can search a group of these indeces.
Each index in the group is searched in sequence,
and then each result is merged.
Henri Biestro wrote:
> I've been looking quickly at your patch and
> kinda understands why Otis is pushing for a merge. :-)
> I dont know how this is usually done;
> should we merge the 2 issues and merge our patches?
> I can try & see how this goes if you want.
I inspected the patch of SOLR-215.
The overlaps between SOLR-215 and SOLR255 are
in the constructor of SolrIndexSearcher and SolrCore.
Each modification should be committed sequentially.
After that, there are not many additional modifications.
The commitment should be done through some stages.
(It might be acceptable Step1 and Step2 is in reverse order. Or, simultaneous?
)
Step1) MultiCore (SOLR-215)
Step2) The functionality of MultiSearcher, exclude modification of RMI and
Lucene.
(SolrMultiSearcher and SolrIndexSearchable)
Step3) The modification of Lucene
Step4) The functional addition to the RMI (SolrRemoteSearcher)
(When it becomes MultiCore, additional modification, in which
the remote object of RMI should be created dynamically, will be needed.)
> One thing that worries me though is the Lucene patch dependency;
> any way to only have a Solr patch?
> I would suspect that Lucene committers are as busy as Solr 's
> so the review process might take sometime.
> Although from far, it does look like pretty harmless changes so there is
> hope...
The RMI (SolrRemoteSearcher) causes the Lucene patch dependency.
There will be no impact on SOLR-215 by the above-mentioned procedure.
> As a side note, I was wondering if we could extend
> you patch's functionality and get read/write capability per index
> (as in http://hellonline.com/blog/?p=55 ,
> document indexing load balancing could be performed
> on hashing unique key % number of indexes for instance
> or by some configurable class).
> The current functionality would be retained
> by specificying 'read-only' versus 'read-write' for each index.
I also have ideas about this but those are not concrete enough.
Anyway, that will be done through Step5 and later.
Thanks.
> RemoteSearchable for Solr(use RMI)
> --
>
> Key: SOLR-255
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-255
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: search
>Reporter: Toru Matsuzawa
> Attachments: solr-multi20070606.zip
>
>
> I experimentally implemented RemoteSearchable of Lucene for Solr.
> I referred to "FederatedSearch" and used RMI.
> Two or more Searchers can be referred to with SolrIndexSearcher.
> These query-only indexes can be specified in solrconfig.xml,
> enumerating the list under a tag.
>
> E:\sample\data1
> E:\sample\data2
> rmi://localhost
>
> The index in the dataDir is also used as the default index of solr
> to update and query.
> When data of a document in a index specified under the is
> updated,
> that document data in the index will be deleted and data of the updated
> document will be stored
> in the index in the dataDir.
> SolrRemoteSearchable (the searcher for remote access) is started from
> SolrCore
> by specifying "< remoteSearcher>true" in solrconfig.xml.(It
> is registered in RMI. )
> ("-Djava.security.policy" should be set when you start VM. )
> Not all of the operational cases are tested
> because Solr has so many features.
> Moreover, TestUnit has not been made
> because I made this through a trial and error process.
> Some changes are required in Lucene to execute this.
> I need your comments on this although it might be hard without TestUnit.
> I especially worry about the followings:
> - Am I on the right truck about this issue?
> - Is the extent of modifying Lucene tolerable?
> - Are there any ideas to implement this feature without modifying Lucene?
> - Does this idea contribute for improving Solr?
> - This implementation may partially overlap with "Multiple Solr Cores".
> What should be done?
> - Are there any other considerations about this issue, which I have
> overlooked?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
Re: [jira] Commented: (SOLR-255) RemoteSearchable for Solr(use RMI)
Yes, I think I mentioned the same thing in one of my comments, I think in SOLR-255. Smaller ==> easier to understand ==> less potential breakage ==> less risk to commit ==> commit! :) Otis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Simpy -- http://www.simpy.com/ - Tag - Search - Share - Original Message From: Mike Klaas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: solr-dev@lucene.apache.org Sent: Saturday, June 23, 2007 1:45:13 AM Subject: Re: [jira] Commented: (SOLR-255) RemoteSearchable for Solr(use RMI) On 22-Jun-07, at 6:53 AM, Henri Biestro (JIRA) wrote: > > [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-255? > page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment- > tabpanel#action_12507326 ] > > Henri Biestro commented on SOLR-255: > > > Toru, > I've been looking quickly at your patch and kinda understands why > Otis is pushing for a merge. :-) > I dont know how this is usually done; should we merge the 2 issues > and merge our patches? > I can try & see how this goes if you want. > > One thing that worries me though is the Lucene patch dependency; > any way to only have a Solr patch? > I would suspect that Lucene committers are as busy as Solr 's so > the review process might take sometime. > Although from far, it does look like pretty harmless changes so > there is hope... > > As a side note, I was wondering if we could extend you patch's > functionality and get read/write capability per index (as in http:// > hellonline.com/blog/?p=55 ,document indexing load balancing could > be performed on hashing unique key % number of indexes for instance > or by some configurable class). The current functionality would be > retained by specificying 'read-only' versus 'read-write' for each > index. I just wanted to note (in midst of all this talk of merging patches and adding functionality), that the larger a patch becomes, the harder it is to evaluate and maintain. It might be better to split it up in terms of dependencies: one patch depends on the other. Or, if the core infrastructure is similar/highly dependent, split it up into a core patch and outward-facing-feature patch. -Mike
Re: [jira] Commented: (SOLR-255) RemoteSearchable for Solr(use RMI)
On 22-Jun-07, at 6:53 AM, Henri Biestro (JIRA) wrote: [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-255? page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment- tabpanel#action_12507326 ] Henri Biestro commented on SOLR-255: Toru, I've been looking quickly at your patch and kinda understands why Otis is pushing for a merge. :-) I dont know how this is usually done; should we merge the 2 issues and merge our patches? I can try & see how this goes if you want. One thing that worries me though is the Lucene patch dependency; any way to only have a Solr patch? I would suspect that Lucene committers are as busy as Solr 's so the review process might take sometime. Although from far, it does look like pretty harmless changes so there is hope... As a side note, I was wondering if we could extend you patch's functionality and get read/write capability per index (as in http:// hellonline.com/blog/?p=55 ,document indexing load balancing could be performed on hashing unique key % number of indexes for instance or by some configurable class). The current functionality would be retained by specificying 'read-only' versus 'read-write' for each index. I just wanted to note (in midst of all this talk of merging patches and adding functionality), that the larger a patch becomes, the harder it is to evaluate and maintain. It might be better to split it up in terms of dependencies: one patch depends on the other. Or, if the core infrastructure is similar/highly dependent, split it up into a core patch and outward-facing-feature patch. -Mike
[jira] Commented: (SOLR-255) RemoteSearchable for Solr(use RMI)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-255?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12507326
]
Henri Biestro commented on SOLR-255:
Toru,
I've been looking quickly at your patch and kinda understands why Otis is
pushing for a merge. :-)
I dont know how this is usually done; should we merge the 2 issues and merge
our patches?
I can try & see how this goes if you want.
One thing that worries me though is the Lucene patch dependency; any way to
only have a Solr patch?
I would suspect that Lucene committers are as busy as Solr 's so the review
process might take sometime.
Although from far, it does look like pretty harmless changes so there is hope...
As a side note, I was wondering if we could extend you patch's functionality
and get read/write capability per index (as in http://hellonline.com/blog/?p=55
,document indexing load balancing could be performed on hashing unique key %
number of indexes for instance or by some configurable class). The current
functionality would be retained by specificying 'read-only' versus 'read-write'
for each index.
Nice job btw.
Henri
> RemoteSearchable for Solr(use RMI)
> --
>
> Key: SOLR-255
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-255
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: search
>Reporter: Toru Matsuzawa
> Attachments: solr-multi20070606.zip
>
>
> I experimentally implemented RemoteSearchable of Lucene for Solr.
> I referred to "FederatedSearch" and used RMI.
> Two or more Searchers can be referred to with SolrIndexSearcher.
> These query-only indexes can be specified in solrconfig.xml,
> enumerating the list under a tag.
>
> E:\sample\data1
> E:\sample\data2
> rmi://localhost
>
> The index in the dataDir is also used as the default index of solr
> to update and query.
> When data of a document in a index specified under the is
> updated,
> that document data in the index will be deleted and data of the updated
> document will be stored
> in the index in the dataDir.
> SolrRemoteSearchable (the searcher for remote access) is started from
> SolrCore
> by specifying "< remoteSearcher>true" in solrconfig.xml.(It
> is registered in RMI. )
> ("-Djava.security.policy" should be set when you start VM. )
> Not all of the operational cases are tested
> because Solr has so many features.
> Moreover, TestUnit has not been made
> because I made this through a trial and error process.
> Some changes are required in Lucene to execute this.
> I need your comments on this although it might be hard without TestUnit.
> I especially worry about the followings:
> - Am I on the right truck about this issue?
> - Is the extent of modifying Lucene tolerable?
> - Are there any ideas to implement this feature without modifying Lucene?
> - Does this idea contribute for improving Solr?
> - This implementation may partially overlap with "Multiple Solr Cores".
> What should be done?
> - Are there any other considerations about this issue, which I have
> overlooked?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Commented: (SOLR-255) RemoteSearchable for Solr(use RMI)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-255?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12506716
]
Otis Gospodnetic commented on SOLR-255:
---
That looks good. So with your patch one can search any *one* of those indices,
or any *group* of those indices, correct? In the case where a *group* of
indices is searched, do you search them in parallel and merge the results?
I'll add a note about this work to SOLR-215. It sounds like you and Henri (the
author of SOLR-215) really need to work together, otherwise applying both his
and your patch will be very difficult.
> RemoteSearchable for Solr(use RMI)
> --
>
> Key: SOLR-255
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-255
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: search
>Reporter: Toru Matsuzawa
> Attachments: solr-multi20070606.zip
>
>
> I experimentally implemented RemoteSearchable of Lucene for Solr.
> I referred to "FederatedSearch" and used RMI.
> Two or more Searchers can be referred to with SolrIndexSearcher.
> These query-only indexes can be specified in solrconfig.xml,
> enumerating the list under a tag.
>
> E:\sample\data1
> E:\sample\data2
> rmi://localhost
>
> The index in the dataDir is also used as the default index of solr
> to update and query.
> When data of a document in a index specified under the is
> updated,
> that document data in the index will be deleted and data of the updated
> document will be stored
> in the index in the dataDir.
> SolrRemoteSearchable (the searcher for remote access) is started from
> SolrCore
> by specifying "< remoteSearcher>true" in solrconfig.xml.(It
> is registered in RMI. )
> ("-Djava.security.policy" should be set when you start VM. )
> Not all of the operational cases are tested
> because Solr has so many features.
> Moreover, TestUnit has not been made
> because I made this through a trial and error process.
> Some changes are required in Lucene to execute this.
> I need your comments on this although it might be hard without TestUnit.
> I especially worry about the followings:
> - Am I on the right truck about this issue?
> - Is the extent of modifying Lucene tolerable?
> - Are there any ideas to implement this feature without modifying Lucene?
> - Does this idea contribute for improving Solr?
> - This implementation may partially overlap with "Multiple Solr Cores".
> What should be done?
> - Are there any other considerations about this issue, which I have
> overlooked?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Commented: (SOLR-255) RemoteSearchable for Solr(use RMI)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-255?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12505078
]
Toru Matsuzawa commented on SOLR-255:
-
My implementation is as follows.
client --> Solr instance +/data/index
+/local/other/solr1/data/index
+/local/other/solr2/data/index
+/local/other/solr3/data/index
|
+--- RMI <--- Remote Solr
index(/data/index)
|
+--- RMI <--- Remote Solr
index(/data/index)
First of all, I'd like to get your comments whether my modification is
beneficial for Solr.
If it is helpful, is it possible to implement this changes without modifying
Lucene?
I need your comments on this point.(If you have any other ideas for the
implementation, please let me know.)
After it becomes clear the necessity of modifying Lucene, I'd like to post it
to Lucene's JIRA.
I understand there are some overlaps with SOLR-215.
However, I think this modification can coexist with SOLR-215.
Thank you.
> RemoteSearchable for Solr(use RMI)
> --
>
> Key: SOLR-255
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-255
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: search
>Reporter: Toru Matsuzawa
> Attachments: solr-multi20070606.zip
>
>
> I experimentally implemented RemoteSearchable of Lucene for Solr.
> I referred to "FederatedSearch" and used RMI.
> Two or more Searchers can be referred to with SolrIndexSearcher.
> These query-only indexes can be specified in solrconfig.xml,
> enumerating the list under a tag.
>
> E:\sample\data1
> E:\sample\data2
> rmi://localhost
>
> The index in the dataDir is also used as the default index of solr
> to update and query.
> When data of a document in a index specified under the is
> updated,
> that document data in the index will be deleted and data of the updated
> document will be stored
> in the index in the dataDir.
> SolrRemoteSearchable (the searcher for remote access) is started from
> SolrCore
> by specifying "< remoteSearcher>true" in solrconfig.xml.(It
> is registered in RMI. )
> ("-Djava.security.policy" should be set when you start VM. )
> Not all of the operational cases are tested
> because Solr has so many features.
> Moreover, TestUnit has not been made
> because I made this through a trial and error process.
> Some changes are required in Lucene to execute this.
> I need your comments on this although it might be hard without TestUnit.
> I especially worry about the followings:
> - Am I on the right truck about this issue?
> - Is the extent of modifying Lucene tolerable?
> - Are there any ideas to implement this feature without modifying Lucene?
> - Does this idea contribute for improving Solr?
> - This implementation may partially overlap with "Multiple Solr Cores".
> What should be done?
> - Are there any other considerations about this issue, which I have
> overlooked?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Commented: (SOLR-255) RemoteSearchable for Solr(use RMI)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-255?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12504740
]
Otis Gospodnetic commented on SOLR-255:
---
I took only a very quick look at this and noticed changes are done in Lucene.
Any such changes should be brought up on the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list and
posted as a patch in Lucene's JIRA. You can explain why you need to make those
changes.
I didn't take a closer look at your Solr changes, but from your description
above, my guess is that this will clash, at least somewhat, with SOLR-215.
Is this what you implemented?
remote lucene index (not
Solr?)
/
RMI
client -> solr instance /
\
RMI
\
remote lucene index (not
Solr?)
Thanks.
> RemoteSearchable for Solr(use RMI)
> --
>
> Key: SOLR-255
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-255
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: search
>Reporter: Toru Matsuzawa
> Attachments: solr-multi20070606.zip
>
>
> I experimentally implemented RemoteSearchable of Lucene for Solr.
> I referred to "FederatedSearch" and used RMI.
> Two or more Searchers can be referred to with SolrIndexSearcher.
> These query-only indexes can be specified in solrconfig.xml,
> enumerating the list under a tag.
>
> E:\sample\data1
> E:\sample\data2
> rmi://localhost
>
> The index in the dataDir is also used as the default index of solr
> to update and query.
> When data of a document in a index specified under the is
> updated,
> that document data in the index will be deleted and data of the updated
> document will be stored
> in the index in the dataDir.
> SolrRemoteSearchable (the searcher for remote access) is started from
> SolrCore
> by specifying "< remoteSearcher>true" in solrconfig.xml.(It
> is registered in RMI. )
> ("-Djava.security.policy" should be set when you start VM. )
> Not all of the operational cases are tested
> because Solr has so many features.
> Moreover, TestUnit has not been made
> because I made this through a trial and error process.
> Some changes are required in Lucene to execute this.
> I need your comments on this although it might be hard without TestUnit.
> I especially worry about the followings:
> - Am I on the right truck about this issue?
> - Is the extent of modifying Lucene tolerable?
> - Are there any ideas to implement this feature without modifying Lucene?
> - Does this idea contribute for improving Solr?
> - This implementation may partially overlap with "Multiple Solr Cores".
> What should be done?
> - Are there any other considerations about this issue, which I have
> overlooked?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
