[jira] Commented: (SOLR-851) Remove dependency on StAX Utils or make it optional
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-851?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12661517#action_12661517 ] Gunnar Wagenknecht commented on SOLR-851: - Any chance this can be included in a 1.4 release? Do you need a patch for this? Remove dependency on StAX Utils or make it optional --- Key: SOLR-851 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-851 Project: Solr Issue Type: Wish Affects Versions: 1.3 Reporter: Gunnar Wagenknecht I found out that the dependency on https://stax-utils.dev.java.net/ comes down to two places where BaseXMLInputFactory.newInstance() is called. Is that intentionally or can those be replaced with XMLInputFactory.newInstance()? The method newInstance is not defined in BaseXMLInputFactory but in XMLInputFactory which comes from the JDK in Java 6. I don't know about Java 5, though. If it's because of Java 5 can I prepare a patch for using reflection to make the dependency on StAX Utils optional? The reason I'm asking is because I'm about to submit Solr 1.3 for IP review to the Eclipse Foundation because I want to use it in our Eclipse project. Lesser dependencies would make it easier. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Commented: (SOLR-851) Remove dependency on StAX Utils or make it optional
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-851?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12661614#action_12661614 ] Ryan McKinley commented on SOLR-851: stax utils is removed from trunk... but the stax libs are required unless you have java 6. if anything else would be helpful, patches are always welcome Remove dependency on StAX Utils or make it optional --- Key: SOLR-851 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-851 Project: Solr Issue Type: Wish Affects Versions: 1.3 Reporter: Gunnar Wagenknecht I found out that the dependency on https://stax-utils.dev.java.net/ comes down to two places where BaseXMLInputFactory.newInstance() is called. Is that intentionally or can those be replaced with XMLInputFactory.newInstance()? The method newInstance is not defined in BaseXMLInputFactory but in XMLInputFactory which comes from the JDK in Java 6. I don't know about Java 5, though. If it's because of Java 5 can I prepare a patch for using reflection to make the dependency on StAX Utils optional? The reason I'm asking is because I'm about to submit Solr 1.3 for IP review to the Eclipse Foundation because I want to use it in our Eclipse project. Lesser dependencies would make it easier. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Commented: (SOLR-851) Remove dependency on StAX Utils or make it optional
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-851?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12661615#action_12661615 ] Gunnar Wagenknecht commented on SOLR-851: - Cool. So this issue can be marked resolved then, can't it? Remove dependency on StAX Utils or make it optional --- Key: SOLR-851 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-851 Project: Solr Issue Type: Wish Affects Versions: 1.3 Reporter: Gunnar Wagenknecht I found out that the dependency on https://stax-utils.dev.java.net/ comes down to two places where BaseXMLInputFactory.newInstance() is called. Is that intentionally or can those be replaced with XMLInputFactory.newInstance()? The method newInstance is not defined in BaseXMLInputFactory but in XMLInputFactory which comes from the JDK in Java 6. I don't know about Java 5, though. If it's because of Java 5 can I prepare a patch for using reflection to make the dependency on StAX Utils optional? The reason I'm asking is because I'm about to submit Solr 1.3 for IP review to the Eclipse Foundation because I want to use it in our Eclipse project. Lesser dependencies would make it easier. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
