Re: Java version for solr development (was Re: Update Plugins)
I also think it is too early to move to 1.6. Only Sun has released their 1.6 JVM. Bill On 1/17/07, Bertrand Delacretaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 1/17/07, Thorsten Scherler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ...Should I use 1.6 for a patch or above mentioned libs?... IMHO moving to 1.6 is way too soon, and if it's only to save two jars it's not worth it. -Bertrand
Re: Java version for solr development (was Re: Update Plugins)
On 1/17/07, Thorsten Scherler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ...Should I use 1.6 for a patch or above mentioned libs?... IMHO moving to 1.6 is way too soon, and if it's only to save two jars it's not worth it. -Bertrand
Re: Java version for solr development (was Re: Update Plugins)
On 1/16/07 8:03 PM, "Yonik Seeley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think it's a bit soon to move to 1.6 - I don't know how many > platforms it's available for yet. It is still in "early release" from IBM for their PowerPC servers, so requiring 1.6 would be a serious problem for us. wunder -- Walter Underwood Search Guru, Netflix
Re: Java version for solr development (was Re: Update Plugins)
On 1/16/07, Thorsten Scherler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I am on 1.5 ATM and using |-- stax-1.2.0-dev.jar `-- stax-utils.jar I don't know where those jars are from, but I guess one would need the stax API jar, and the implementation (woodstox I would think) jar. That's two jars instead of one, but they could go away with a move to Java6. The API is likely to have a much longer lifetime too. Two more dependencies. Setting min version would get rid of this. Should I use 1.6 for a patch or above mentioned libs? I think it's a bit soon to move to 1.6 - I don't know how many platforms it's available for yet. -Yonik
Java version for solr development (was Re: Update Plugins)
On Tue, 2007-01-16 at 15:49 -0500, Yonik Seeley wrote: > On 1/16/07, J.J. Larrea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > - Revise the XML-based update code (broken out of SolrCore into a > > RequestHandler) to use all the above. > > +++1, that's been needed forever. > If one has the time, I'd also advocate moving to StAX (via woodstox > for Java5, but it's built into Java6). I was up to have a look on this. Seeing this comment makes me think. I am on 1.5 ATM and using |-- stax-1.2.0-dev.jar `-- stax-utils.jar Two more dependencies. Setting min version would get rid of this. Should I use 1.6 for a patch or above mentioned libs? wdyt? salu2 -- thorsten "Together we stand, divided we fall!" Hey you (Pink Floyd)
