Re: another one for 1.4?
let us leave it for 1.5 ... On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 2:44 AM, Ryan McKinley wrote: > i say we leave it out... > > That is a direct mapping of the XML format to JSON. I think discussion > suggested we may want to munge the format a bit before baking it into the > code. > > > On Oct 12, 2009, at 4:42 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: > >> I think we leave it out. >> >> On Oct 12, 2009, at 4:27 PM, Erik Hatcher wrote: >> >>> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-945 - JSON update handler, >>> comments mention it could/should make it to 1.4. Just came across it again, >>> was curious. >>> >>> Erik >>> >> >> > > -- - Noble Paul | Principal Engineer| AOL | http://aol.com
Re: another one for 1.4?
i say we leave it out... That is a direct mapping of the XML format to JSON. I think discussion suggested we may want to munge the format a bit before baking it into the code. On Oct 12, 2009, at 4:42 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: I think we leave it out. On Oct 12, 2009, at 4:27 PM, Erik Hatcher wrote: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-945 - JSON update handler, comments mention it could/should make it to 1.4. Just came across it again, was curious. Erik
Re: another one for 1.4?
I think we leave it out. On Oct 12, 2009, at 4:27 PM, Erik Hatcher wrote: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-945 - JSON update handler, comments mention it could/should make it to 1.4. Just came across it again, was curious. Erik
