Re: forrest version?
I think I got it under control now... it was the ext:wiki in tabs.xml that was causing the problems for forrest 0.7 -Yonik On 1/30/06, Doug Cutting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yoav Shapira wrote: > > OK, consistency is a good value. I still think it's more of a pain > > than it's worth, unless Nutch/Lucene are using Forrest features that > > can't be done far more simply. We could achieve the same look and > > feel via CSS skinning I'd imagine... But since I don't have much > > bandwidth to spend on this, I don't want to lobby too hard: if you're > > comfortable with Forrest for consistency's sake, that's cool. > > I thought that Forrest would be simpler, since we could just clone stuff > in Nutch. I'm not in love with Forrest. If you think another way would > be simpler yet, have at it. > > I don't think the look-and-feel do not need to match other projects too > closely. > > For the record, I used forrest-0.6 on Nutch and Lucene TLP. > > Doug >
Re: forrest version?
Yoav Shapira wrote: OK, consistency is a good value. I still think it's more of a pain than it's worth, unless Nutch/Lucene are using Forrest features that can't be done far more simply. We could achieve the same look and feel via CSS skinning I'd imagine... But since I don't have much bandwidth to spend on this, I don't want to lobby too hard: if you're comfortable with Forrest for consistency's sake, that's cool. I thought that Forrest would be simpler, since we could just clone stuff in Nutch. I'm not in love with Forrest. If you think another way would be simpler yet, have at it. I don't think the look-and-feel do not need to match other projects too closely. For the record, I used forrest-0.6 on Nutch and Lucene TLP. Doug
Re: forrest version?
Hola, OK, consistency is a good value. I still think it's more of a pain than it's worth, unless Nutch/Lucene are using Forrest features that can't be done far more simply. We could achieve the same look and feel via CSS skinning I'd imagine... But since I don't have much bandwidth to spend on this, I don't want to lobby too hard: if you're comfortable with Forrest for consistency's sake, that's cool. Yoav On 1/30/06, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I started with Forrest simply because Nutch and the top level Lucene use it. > > -Yonik > > On 1/30/06, Yoav Shapira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Why Forrest? I think it's over-engineered for simple sites. The > > xdocs approach is so much easier to understand and use on a regular > > basis. See e.g. > > http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/logging/site/trunk/. > > > > Yoav > > > > On 1/30/06, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Sigh. When I deleted most of the stuff to get a barebones site, I'm > > > back to the same error. > > > I guess the next step is to build a devel version of forrest and hope > > > it works (or hope for an understandable error message at least). > > > > > > -Yonik > > > > > > On 1/29/06, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > What version of forrest are people using to build nutch? > > > > > > > > I downloaded the prebuilt forrest 0.7, executed forrest.bat in > > > > nutch/src/site, and it failed (I used the .bat version, because the > > > > normal shell script failed even faster under cygwin). > > > > > > > > The error: > > > > X [0] linkmap.html BROKEN: No > > > > pipeline matc > > > > hed request: linkmap-linkmap.html > > > > > > > > Then I tried forrest.bat in forrest's own site-author, and that failed > > > > too. > > > > > > > > Last, I tried forrest.bat seed, then I tried to build that, and it > > > > worked! So that's what I'm starting from (and crossing my fingers). > > > > > > > > -Yonik > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Yoav Shapira > > System Design and Management Fellow > > MIT Sloan School of Management > > Cambridge, MA, USA > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.yoavshapira.com > > > -- Yoav Shapira System Design and Management Fellow MIT Sloan School of Management Cambridge, MA, USA [EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.yoavshapira.com
Re: forrest version?
I started with Forrest simply because Nutch and the top level Lucene use it. -Yonik On 1/30/06, Yoav Shapira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Why Forrest? I think it's over-engineered for simple sites. The > xdocs approach is so much easier to understand and use on a regular > basis. See e.g. > http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/logging/site/trunk/. > > Yoav > > On 1/30/06, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Sigh. When I deleted most of the stuff to get a barebones site, I'm > > back to the same error. > > I guess the next step is to build a devel version of forrest and hope > > it works (or hope for an understandable error message at least). > > > > -Yonik > > > > On 1/29/06, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > What version of forrest are people using to build nutch? > > > > > > I downloaded the prebuilt forrest 0.7, executed forrest.bat in > > > nutch/src/site, and it failed (I used the .bat version, because the > > > normal shell script failed even faster under cygwin). > > > > > > The error: > > > X [0] linkmap.html BROKEN: No > > > pipeline matc > > > hed request: linkmap-linkmap.html > > > > > > Then I tried forrest.bat in forrest's own site-author, and that failed > > > too. > > > > > > Last, I tried forrest.bat seed, then I tried to build that, and it > > > worked! So that's what I'm starting from (and crossing my fingers). > > > > > > -Yonik > > > > > > > > -- > Yoav Shapira > System Design and Management Fellow > MIT Sloan School of Management > Cambridge, MA, USA > [EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.yoavshapira.com >
Re: forrest version?
Why Forrest? I think it's over-engineered for simple sites. The xdocs approach is so much easier to understand and use on a regular basis. See e.g. http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/logging/site/trunk/. Yoav On 1/30/06, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sigh. When I deleted most of the stuff to get a barebones site, I'm > back to the same error. > I guess the next step is to build a devel version of forrest and hope > it works (or hope for an understandable error message at least). > > -Yonik > > On 1/29/06, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > What version of forrest are people using to build nutch? > > > > I downloaded the prebuilt forrest 0.7, executed forrest.bat in > > nutch/src/site, and it failed (I used the .bat version, because the > > normal shell script failed even faster under cygwin). > > > > The error: > > X [0] linkmap.html BROKEN: No pipeline > > matc > > hed request: linkmap-linkmap.html > > > > Then I tried forrest.bat in forrest's own site-author, and that failed too. > > > > Last, I tried forrest.bat seed, then I tried to build that, and it > > worked! So that's what I'm starting from (and crossing my fingers). > > > > -Yonik > > > -- Yoav Shapira System Design and Management Fellow MIT Sloan School of Management Cambridge, MA, USA [EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.yoavshapira.com
Re: forrest version?
Sigh. When I deleted most of the stuff to get a barebones site, I'm back to the same error. I guess the next step is to build a devel version of forrest and hope it works (or hope for an understandable error message at least). -Yonik On 1/29/06, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What version of forrest are people using to build nutch? > > I downloaded the prebuilt forrest 0.7, executed forrest.bat in > nutch/src/site, and it failed (I used the .bat version, because the > normal shell script failed even faster under cygwin). > > The error: > X [0] linkmap.html BROKEN: No pipeline > matc > hed request: linkmap-linkmap.html > > Then I tried forrest.bat in forrest's own site-author, and that failed too. > > Last, I tried forrest.bat seed, then I tried to build that, and it > worked! So that's what I'm starting from (and crossing my fingers). > > -Yonik >
forrest version?
What version of forrest are people using to build nutch? I downloaded the prebuilt forrest 0.7, executed forrest.bat in nutch/src/site, and it failed (I used the .bat version, because the normal shell script failed even faster under cygwin). The error: X [0] linkmap.html BROKEN: No pipeline matc hed request: linkmap-linkmap.html Then I tried forrest.bat in forrest's own site-author, and that failed too. Last, I tried forrest.bat seed, then I tried to build that, and it worked! So that's what I'm starting from (and crossing my fingers). -Yonik
