Re: index browsing with solr

2007-02-25 Thread Pierre-Yves LANDRON

http://localhost:8983/solr/select?qt=indexinfo&wt=ruby&indent=on

Though IndexInfoRequestHandler is practically obsolete with Ryan's
"Luke" contribution... isn't that so, Ryan?



functionality-wise, yes.

I pointed to the IndexInfoRequestHandler because it is the simplest
SolrRequestHandler that gets into lucene internals.  Adding term
browsing to it is really straight forward - thats how i stumbled into
writing the "luke" thing!


I'm not sure I understand...
Ryan, how can I have access to your contribution ? (is it a contribution to 
Luke or to the solr rest interface ?)

Is this implemented yet, and if so, how can I use it ?
Thanks.

Pierre-Yves Landron

_
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE! 
http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/




Re: index browsing with solr

2007-02-25 Thread Ryan McKinley


I'm not sure I understand...
Ryan, how can I have access to your contribution ? (is it a contribution to
Luke or to the solr rest interface ?)
Is this implemented yet, and if so, how can I use it ?
Thanks.



Solr has a pluggable request handling framework that lets you easily
write custom logic and takes care of the xml/json/etc writing for you.
Check:

http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrPlugins#head-7c0d03515c496017f6c0116ebb096e34a872cb61
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrRequestHandler

Since the exact term browsing mechanism you asked for is not
supported, I suggested writing your own and looking to the
IndexInfoRequestHandler as a simple starting place.

After more thought (and Yonik pointing it out), you are probably best
off if you can use faced browsing to do what you need.
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrFacetingOverview

The 'luke' comments are unrelated to your direct question, but you can
check that out here: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-162

ryan


Overriding Ranking in solr

2007-02-25 Thread shai deljo

Is there a way to add a plug in to override the ranking in Solr? e.g.
my ranking is based on distance from a Geo location provided in the
query.
Thanks,
Shai


Document boost not reflected in fieldNorm

2007-02-25 Thread Ken Krugler

Hi all,

I've got a keyword field defined as a text_ws type in my Solr schema, 
and it always contains one or two of about 20 fixed values.


When documents get added, they have a  boost 
supplied, where this varies from just above 0 to a max of 2.0.


When I do do a query on that keyword field, I was expecting that the 
ordering of the results would match the boost values, now that I'm no 
longer specifying omitNorms="true" for the field.


But I still get seemingly random results. When I use the full search 
interface in Solr, the results for two documents with different 
boosts looks like:


  
4.687879 = (MATCH) fieldWeight(keyword:test in 114), product of:
  1.0 = tf(termFreq(keyword:test)=1)
  2.678788 = idf(docFreq=1865)
  1.75 = fieldNorm(field=keyword, doc=114)


  
4.687879 = (MATCH) fieldWeight(keyword:test in 625), product of:
  1.0 = tf(termFreq(keyword:test)=1)
  2.678788 = idf(docFreq=1865)
  1.75 = fieldNorm(field=keyword, doc=625)

I was expecting the fieldNorm() value to be different, because of the 
different document boost values. What am I missing?


Thanks,

-- Ken
--
Ken Krugler
Krugle, Inc.
+1 530-210-6378
"Find Code, Find Answers"