Nrt and caching

[Amit Nithian]

Sorry I'm a bit new to the nrt stuff in solr but I'm trying to understand
the implications of frequent commits and cache rebuilding and auto warming.
What are the best practices surrounding nrt searching and caches and query
performance.

Thanks!
Amit

Grouping and Stats

[Jeremy Branham]

Hello -
I’m not sure If this is an appropriate use for Solr, but I want to stay away 
from a typical DB store for high availability reasons.

I am storing documents that may have a common value for a field we’ll call 
“category”.
In another field there will be an integer field we’ll call “rating”.

I would like to group the documents on the “category” field and display the 
average “rating” per group.

The stats component lets me get the avg rating, but when I collapse the results 
into groups it gives me the average for the entire collection, rather than for 
the specific group.

Am I going about this wrong?
Is it possible to get the desired outcome with a  single query?

I’d appreciate any insight!
Thank you,

Jeremy Branham
Software Engineer
http://LinkedIn.com/in/JeremyBranham 
http://jeremybranham.wordpress.com/ 
http://Zeroth.biz

Re: Multi-thread UpdateProcessor

[Dmitry Kan]

Mikhail,

you have my +1 and a jira comment :)

// Dmitry

On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 7:41 PM, Mikhail Khludnev  wrote:

> Okay, why do you think this idea is not worth to look at?
>
> On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 12:53 AM, Mikhail Khludnev <
> mkhlud...@griddynamics.com> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > Most times when single thread streaming
> > http://wiki.apache.org/solr/Solrj#Streaming_documents_for_an_update is
> > used I saw lack of cpu utilization at Solr server. Resonable motivation
> is
> > utilize more threads to index faster, but it requires more complicated
> >  client side.
> > I propose to employ special update processor which can fork the stream
> > processing onto many threads. If you like it pls vote for
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3585 .
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > --
> > Sincerely yours
> > Mikhail Khludnev
> > Tech Lead
> > Grid Dynamics
> >
> > 
> >  
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Sincerely yours
> Mikhail Khludnev
> Tech Lead
> Grid Dynamics
>
> 
>  
>



-- 
Regards,

Dmitry Kan

Re: Boosting the score of the whole documents

[Chris Hostetter]

: I would like to give a boost to the whole documents as I index them. I am
: sending to solr the xml in the form:
: 
: 
: 
: But it does't seem to alter the search scores in any way. I would expect

http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrRelevancyFAQ#How_can_I_increase_the_score_for_specific_documents
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/UpdateXmlMessages#Optional_attributes_on_.22doc.22

http://lucene.apache.org/core/3_6_0/api/core/org/apache/lucene/search/Similarity.html#formula_norm


-Hoss

Re: Regression of JIRA 1826?

[Jamie Johnson]

A little more information on this.

I tinkered a bit with the schema and it appears to be related to
WordDelimiterFilterFactory and splitOnCaseChange being true, or at
least this setting being set exhibits the issue.

Also I am using the edismax query parser.  Again any ideas/help would
be greatly appreciated.

On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 1:40 AM, Jamie Johnson  wrote:
> I just upgraded to trunk to try to fix an issue I was having with the
> highlighter described in JIRA 1826, but it appears that this issue
> still exists on trunk.  I'm running the following query
>
> subject:ztest*
>
> subject is a text field (not multivalued) and the return in highlighting is
>
> ZTestForZTestForJamie
>
> the actual stored value is "ZTestForJamie".  Is anyone else experiencing this?

Re: How to Request several docs ?

[Bruno Mannina]

Le 06/07/2012 19:37, Bruno Mannina a écrit :

Le 06/07/2012 19:26, Erick Erickson a écrit :
It should. So, add &debugQuery=on and examine the results. Also, we 
should

see the field definition and results of the above. You might have
your default operator set to AND rather than OR (adding the debug param
should make this plain)..

ok I not yet tested but



;o) 

Changed, Tested and results are here !

Thanks a lot !

Re: How to Request several docs ?

[Bruno Mannina]

Le 06/07/2012 19:26, Erick Erickson a écrit :

It should. So, add &debugQuery=on and examine the results. Also, we should
see the field definition and results of the above. You might have
your default operator set to AND rather than OR (adding the debug param
should make this plain)..

ok I not yet tested but



;o)


If your pn is a "string" type, then it will be case sensitive. I'm
assuming that you've
tried it with a single value rather than two, right?

yes with one I have result, I take care about Upper/Lower case


The admin/schema browser link will allow you to examine the actual contents of
the field in your index, you might look at your pn field to see what
the values look
like there, and if they're what you expect.

Consider reviewing: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/UsingMailingLists, you
haven't provided much information to go on

sorry, I will be more explicit if I have a new message.


Best
Erick

On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 12:43 PM, Bruno Mannina  wrote:

Hi Gheeta,

Sorry but I don't understand, I suppose uniqueKey for me is "pn" field
and (pin1 pin2) are values. but if it's that, it not works.

I do:
http://localhost:8983/solr/select/?q=pn:%28EP100A1%20FR2963608A1%29&version=2.2&start=0&rows=10&indent=on

no error but no result !


Le 06/07/2012 18:35, geetha anjali a écrit :


Hi Bruno,
Check this
http://localhost:8983/solr/select?q=uniqueKey:(pin1 pin2)



On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 7:13 PM, Bruno Mannina  wrote:


Dear Solr users,

I would like to request/get several docs indexed by solr with only one
request.

I have a schema.xml where my field PN is the key field (unique key), I
have more than 80M docs in my index.

I have a list of PN that I want to get and I don't want to do one request
by PN and I think it's not clean to do
PN1 or PN2 or PN3 or .

Is it possible to do a request with PN1, PN2, PN3, etc... PNn
Where "n" can be 20 or 30 by example.

Thanks a lot,
Bruno

Re: How to Request several docs ?

[Erick Erickson]

It should. So, add &debugQuery=on and examine the results. Also, we should
see the field definition and results of the above. You might have
your default operator set to AND rather than OR (adding the debug param
should make this plain)..

If your pn is a "string" type, then it will be case sensitive. I'm
assuming that you've
tried it with a single value rather than two, right?

The admin/schema browser link will allow you to examine the actual contents of
the field in your index, you might look at your pn field to see what
the values look
like there, and if they're what you expect.

Consider reviewing: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/UsingMailingLists, you
haven't provided much information to go on

Best
Erick

On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 12:43 PM, Bruno Mannina  wrote:
> Hi Gheeta,
>
> Sorry but I don't understand, I suppose uniqueKey for me is "pn" field
> and (pin1 pin2) are values. but if it's that, it not works.
>
> I do:
> http://localhost:8983/solr/select/?q=pn:%28EP100A1%20FR2963608A1%29&version=2.2&start=0&rows=10&indent=on
>
> no error but no result !
>
>
> Le 06/07/2012 18:35, geetha anjali a écrit :
>
>> Hi Bruno,
>> Check this
>> http://localhost:8983/solr/select?q=uniqueKey:(pin1 pin2)
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 7:13 PM, Bruno Mannina  wrote:
>>
>>> Dear Solr users,
>>>
>>> I would like to request/get several docs indexed by solr with only one
>>> request.
>>>
>>> I have a schema.xml where my field PN is the key field (unique key), I
>>> have more than 80M docs in my index.
>>>
>>> I have a list of PN that I want to get and I don't want to do one request
>>> by PN and I think it's not clean to do
>>> PN1 or PN2 or PN3 or .
>>>
>>> Is it possible to do a request with PN1, PN2, PN3, etc... PNn
>>> Where "n" can be 20 or 30 by example.
>>>
>>> Thanks a lot,
>>> Bruno
>>>
>
>

Re: Better (and valid) Spellcheck in combination with other parameters with at least one occurance

[Erick Erickson]

Be a little patient, we're all volunteers here.

On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 8:55 AM, ninaddesai82  wrote:
> anyone ??
>
> --
> View this message in context: 
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Better-and-valid-Spellcheck-in-combination-with-other-parameters-with-at-least-one-occurance-tp3993484p3993498.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: How to Request several docs ?

[Bruno Mannina]

Hi Gheeta,

Sorry but I don't understand, I suppose uniqueKey for me is "pn" field
and (pin1 pin2) are values. but if it's that, it not works.

I do:
http://localhost:8983/solr/select/?q=pn:%28EP100A1%20FR2963608A1%29&version=2.2&start=0&rows=10&indent=on

no error but no result !


Le 06/07/2012 18:35, geetha anjali a écrit :

Hi Bruno,
Check this
http://localhost:8983/solr/select?q=uniqueKey:(pin1 pin2)



On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 7:13 PM, Bruno Mannina  wrote:


Dear Solr users,

I would like to request/get several docs indexed by solr with only one
request.

I have a schema.xml where my field PN is the key field (unique key), I
have more than 80M docs in my index.

I have a list of PN that I want to get and I don't want to do one request
by PN and I think it's not clean to do
PN1 or PN2 or PN3 or .

Is it possible to do a request with PN1, PN2, PN3, etc... PNn
Where "n" can be 20 or 30 by example.

Thanks a lot,
Bruno

Re: Multi-thread UpdateProcessor

[Mikhail Khludnev]

Okay, why do you think this idea is not worth to look at?

On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 12:53 AM, Mikhail Khludnev <
mkhlud...@griddynamics.com> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> Most times when single thread streaming
> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/Solrj#Streaming_documents_for_an_update is
> used I saw lack of cpu utilization at Solr server. Resonable motivation is
> utilize more threads to index faster, but it requires more complicated
>  client side.
> I propose to employ special update processor which can fork the stream
> processing onto many threads. If you like it pls vote for
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3585 .
>
> Regards
>
> --
> Sincerely yours
> Mikhail Khludnev
> Tech Lead
> Grid Dynamics
>
> 
>  
>
>


-- 
Sincerely yours
Mikhail Khludnev
Tech Lead
Grid Dynamics


 

Re: How to Request several docs ?

[geetha anjali]

Hi Bruno,
Check this
http://localhost:8983/solr/select?q=uniqueKey:(pin1 pin2)



On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 7:13 PM, Bruno Mannina  wrote:

> Dear Solr users,
>
> I would like to request/get several docs indexed by solr with only one
> request.
>
> I have a schema.xml where my field PN is the key field (unique key), I
> have more than 80M docs in my index.
>
> I have a list of PN that I want to get and I don't want to do one request
> by PN and I think it's not clean to do
> PN1 or PN2 or PN3 or .
>
> Is it possible to do a request with PN1, PN2, PN3, etc... PNn
> Where "n" can be 20 or 30 by example.
>
> Thanks a lot,
> Bruno
>

Re: Better (and valid) Spellcheck in combination with other parameters with at least one occurance

[ninaddesai82]

anyone ??

--
View this message in context: 
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Better-and-valid-Spellcheck-in-combination-with-other-parameters-with-at-least-one-occurance-tp3993484p3993498.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Better (and valid) Spellcheck in combination with other parameters with at least one occurance

[Erick Erickson]

I happen to remember this JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2462

be a bit careful if you use collate with 3.1 or 3.2...

Best
Erick

On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 10:36 AM, Dyer, James  wrote:
> If you're using Solr3.1 or higher, you can do this.  See 
> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SpellCheckComponent#spellcheck.collate .  Here's 
> a summary:
>
> - specify "spellcheck.collate=true" to get a re-written query made from the 
> individual word suggestions.
>
> - specify "spellcheck.maxCollationTries" to something >0 (10, perhaps) to 
> have it "try" the collation possibilities against the index before returning 
> them to the user.  This means that all collations returned will be guaranteed 
> to return hits.
>
> - specify "spellcheck.collateExtendedResults=true" if you want hit counts for 
> the collation queries and also details on which original word was replaced by 
> which new word.
>
> - specify "spellcheck.maxCollations" to something >1 if you want to get more 
> than 1 collation returned.
>
> If on 4.0-alpha:
>
> - maybe specify "spellcheck.collateParam.mm=100%", if your original query had 
> a very low "mm" value.  This will make the collations returned more 
> meaningful to the user.
>
> - maybe specify "spellcheck.alternativeTermCount" to something >0 if you want 
> the spellchecker to consider that the user might have misspelled words even 
> though the misspelling occurs somewhere in the index.
>
> James Dyer
> E-Commerce Systems
> Ingram Content Group
> (615) 213-4311
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ninaddesai82 [mailto:desai.ni...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, July 06, 2012 6:04 AM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Better (and valid) Spellcheck in combination with other parameters 
> with at least one occurance
>
> Hi,
> I am trying to implement solr search with spellcheck. -
>
> My current seach works like this - I have some specific criteria for every
> search query. i.e. If I am hitting search with q=restaurants , I also pass
> another param say c=mumbai. So solr returns me restaurants in mumbai.
>
> Now I want to implement spellcheck, but at the same time I also want to make
> sure that whatever results my spellcheck is providing, are valid (means have
> at least one occurance in combination with my other param as in c=city). I
> am not able to decide how to achieve that.
>
> i.e.
> If I pass say "hangry" to solr with spell check then spell check retuerns
> few suggestions like "hungry", "angry"
> However I want to suggest user only those suggestions which have hitcounts
> in my data with common field as in c=mumbai.
> Otherwise what happens is - solr returns me some suggestion words "hungry ,
> angry" and if they dont have ny records with combination of city, it returns
> no result, which is bad user experience.
>
> so ideally Solr should return me suggestion for only those words which have
> at least 1 count for that suggestion with mumbai.
>
> I am currently firing 2 queries to luscene in order to achieve this
> Query one - spellcheck - this gives me word suggestns
> Query two - with given words in spell check i run facet query to get
> occurance counts to check which ones are valid.
> But this seems like unnecessary over head (Query two - with facet takes too
> long to respond as well). And I am trying to find more optimized way to do
> this.
>
> Can anyone suggest me how to do that ?
>
> thanks,
> ndesai
>
> --
> View this message in context: 
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Better-and-valid-Spellcheck-in-combination-with-other-parameters-with-at-least-one-occurance-tp3993484.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Solr facet multiple constraint

[Erick Erickson]

What does "doesn't work" mean? returning no results? Not returning facets?
returning incorrect facet counts?

You might review:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/UsingMailingLists

Best
Erick

On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 1:37 AM, davidbougearel
 wrote:
> Well thanks for your answer, in fact i've written what the QueryResponse
> return as the solr query here is my real solr query before use the
> executeQuery :
>
> q=service%3A1+AND+publicationstatus%3ALIVE&sort=publishingdate+desc&fq=%7B%21ex%3Ddt%7D%28%28%28user%3A10%29%29%29&facet.field=%7B%21tag%3Ddt%7Duser&facet=true&facet.mincount=1
>
> which is the same as my first post without the 'wt=javabin' and & instead of
> commas.
>
> Could you please see if there is something wrong for you ?
>
> Best regards,
>
> David.
>
> --
> View this message in context: 
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-facet-multiple-constraint-tp3992974p3993408.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

RE: Better (and valid) Spellcheck in combination with other parameters with at least one occurance

[Dyer, James]

If you're using Solr3.1 or higher, you can do this.  See 
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SpellCheckComponent#spellcheck.collate .  Here's a 
summary:

- specify "spellcheck.collate=true" to get a re-written query made from the 
individual word suggestions.

- specify "spellcheck.maxCollationTries" to something >0 (10, perhaps) to have 
it "try" the collation possibilities against the index before returning them to 
the user.  This means that all collations returned will be guaranteed to return 
hits.  

- specify "spellcheck.collateExtendedResults=true" if you want hit counts for 
the collation queries and also details on which original word was replaced by 
which new word.

- specify "spellcheck.maxCollations" to something >1 if you want to get more 
than 1 collation returned.  

If on 4.0-alpha:

- maybe specify "spellcheck.collateParam.mm=100%", if your original query had a 
very low "mm" value.  This will make the collations returned more meaningful to 
the user.

- maybe specify "spellcheck.alternativeTermCount" to something >0 if you want 
the spellchecker to consider that the user might have misspelled words even 
though the misspelling occurs somewhere in the index.

James Dyer
E-Commerce Systems
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311


-Original Message-
From: ninaddesai82 [mailto:desai.ni...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Friday, July 06, 2012 6:04 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Better (and valid) Spellcheck in combination with other parameters 
with at least one occurance

Hi,
I am trying to implement solr search with spellcheck. - 

My current seach works like this - I have some specific criteria for every
search query. i.e. If I am hitting search with q=restaurants , I also pass
another param say c=mumbai. So solr returns me restaurants in mumbai.

Now I want to implement spellcheck, but at the same time I also want to make
sure that whatever results my spellcheck is providing, are valid (means have
at least one occurance in combination with my other param as in c=city). I
am not able to decide how to achieve that.

i.e. 
If I pass say "hangry" to solr with spell check then spell check retuerns
few suggestions like "hungry", "angry"
However I want to suggest user only those suggestions which have hitcounts
in my data with common field as in c=mumbai.
Otherwise what happens is - solr returns me some suggestion words "hungry ,
angry" and if they dont have ny records with combination of city, it returns
no result, which is bad user experience.

so ideally Solr should return me suggestion for only those words which have
at least 1 count for that suggestion with mumbai. 

I am currently firing 2 queries to luscene in order to achieve this 
Query one - spellcheck - this gives me word suggestns
Query two - with given words in spell check i run facet query to get
occurance counts to check which ones are valid.
But this seems like unnecessary over head (Query two - with facet takes too
long to respond as well). And I am trying to find more optimized way to do
this.

Can anyone suggest me how to do that ?

thanks,
ndesai

--
View this message in context: 
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Better-and-valid-Spellcheck-in-combination-with-other-parameters-with-at-least-one-occurance-tp3993484.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: How to Request several docs ?

[Paul Libbrecht]

Le 6 juil. 2012 à 15:43, Bruno Mannina a écrit :

> I have a list of PN that I want to get and I don't want to do one request by 
> PN and I think it's not clean to do
> PN1 or PN2 or PN3 or .

I've always done this so.

paul

Re: Solr 4.0 UI issue

[anarchos78]

Didn't helped

--
View this message in context: 
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-4-0-UI-issue-tp3993286p3993507.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

How to Request several docs ?

[Bruno Mannina]

Dear Solr users,

I would like to request/get several docs indexed by solr with only one 
request.


I have a schema.xml where my field PN is the key field (unique key), I 
have more than 80M docs in my index.


I have a list of PN that I want to get and I don't want to do one 
request by PN and I think it's not clean to do

PN1 or PN2 or PN3 or .

Is it possible to do a request with PN1, PN2, PN3, etc... PNn
Where "n" can be 20 or 30 by example.

Thanks a lot,
Bruno

Re: solr-4.0 and high cpu usage [SOLVED]

[Erick Erickson]

Thanks for bringing closure on this, it'll probably help others too!

Erick

On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 12:28 PM, Anatoli Matuskova
 wrote:
> Found why!
> On Solr 1.4 dismax param mm defaults to 1 if not specified, which is
> equivalent to AND. On Solr 4.0 if mm is not specified, the default operator
> is used, which defaults to OR. That made return much more results for each
> query I was running, increasing the response time and the CPU usage.
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: 
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/solr-4-0-and-high-cpu-usage-tp3993187p3993275.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Better (and valid) Spellcheck in combination with other parameters with at least one occurance

[ninaddesai82]

Hi,
I am trying to implement solr search with spellcheck. - 

My current seach works like this - I have some specific criteria for every
search query. i.e. If I am hitting search with q=restaurants , I also pass
another param say c=mumbai. So solr returns me restaurants in mumbai.

Now I want to implement spellcheck, but at the same time I also want to make
sure that whatever results my spellcheck is providing, are valid (means have
at least one occurance in combination with my other param as in c=city). I
am not able to decide how to achieve that.

i.e. 
If I pass say "hangry" to solr with spell check then spell check retuerns
few suggestions like "hungry", "angry"
However I want to suggest user only those suggestions which have hitcounts
in my data with common field as in c=mumbai.
Otherwise what happens is - solr returns me some suggestion words "hungry ,
angry" and if they dont have ny records with combination of city, it returns
no result, which is bad user experience.

so ideally Solr should return me suggestion for only those words which have
at least 1 count for that suggestion with mumbai. 

I am currently firing 2 queries to luscene in order to achieve this 
Query one - spellcheck - this gives me word suggestns
Query two - with given words in spell check i run facet query to get
occurance counts to check which ones are valid.
But this seems like unnecessary over head (Query two - with facet takes too
long to respond as well). And I am trying to find more optimized way to do
this.

Can anyone suggest me how to do that ?

thanks,
ndesai

--
View this message in context: 
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Better-and-valid-Spellcheck-in-combination-with-other-parameters-with-at-least-one-occurance-tp3993484.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Solr 4.0 UI issue

[Sachin Aggarwal]

restart ur browser and solr if u r using example and do check u haven't
removed the line
”

from solr config same worked for me.

On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 1:21 PM, anarchos78 wrote:

> Thank you for reply,
>
> I didn't get you. What do you mean by saying: "so you may check the (raw)
> log output ..". Please help!
> Thank you in advance
> Tom
> Greece
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-4-0-UI-issue-tp3993286p3993427.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>



-- 

Thanks & Regards

Sachin Aggarwal
7760502772

solr-user@lucene.apache.org

[Michael Belenki]

Dear community,

I am experiencing strange problem while trying to index / to import XML
document to SOLR via DataImportHandler. The XML document contains some
special characters (e.g. german ü) that are represented as XML entities
ü or ä. There is also DTD file that defines these entities
() (I tried to use dtd file as well as to
include the DTD definition to the xml itself). After I start the import
command full-import, the import process throws an exception as soon as it
tries to parse ü: "Un
declared general entity "uuml". Did anyone already face such a problem? 

best regards,

Michael


My data-config for importing is:











   



The XML file looks e.g. like this:




]>



Marco Riccardi
Solution of Cubic and Quartic Equations.ü
117-122
2009
17

Formalized Mathematics

1-4
http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/v10037-009-0012-zdb/journals/fm/fm17.html#Riccardi09


The stack-trace is:

05.07.2012 17:37:19 org.apache.solr.update.processor.LogUpdateProcessor
finish
INFO: {deleteByQuery=*:*,add=[persons/Codd71a, persons/Hall74]} 0 1
05.07.2012 17:37:19 org.apache.solr.common.SolrException log
SCHWERWIEGEND: Full Import failed:java.lang.RuntimeException:
java.lang.RuntimeE
xception: org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.DataImportHandlerException:
Parsing
 failed for xml, url:documents/dblp.xml rows processed in this xml:2 last
row in
 this xml:{title=Common Subexpression Identification in General Algebraic
System
s., $forEach=/dblp/article, key=persons/Hall74} Processing Document # 3
at
org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.DocBuilder.execute(DocBuilder.java
:264)
at
org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.DataImporter.doFullImport(DataImpo
rter.java:375)
at
org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.DataImporter.runCmd(DataImporter.j
ava:445)
at
org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.DataImporter$1.run(DataImporter.ja
va:426)
Caused by: java.lang.RuntimeException:
org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.DataIm
portHandlerException: Parsing failed for xml, url:documents/dblp.xml rows
proces
sed in this xml:2 last row in this xml:{title=Common Subexpression
Identificatio
n in General Algebraic Systems., $forEach=/dblp/article,
key=persons/Hall74} Pro
cessing Document # 3
at
org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.DocBuilder.buildDocument(DocBuilde
r.java:621)
at
org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.DocBuilder.doFullDump(DocBuilder.j
ava:327)
at
org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.DocBuilder.execute(DocBuilder.java
:225)
... 3 more
Caused by: org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.DataImportHandlerException:
Parsin
g failed for xml, url:documents/dblp.xml rows processed in this xml:2 last
row i
n this xml:{title=Common Subexpression Identification in General Algebraic
Syste
ms., $forEach=/dblp/article, key=persons/Hall74} Processing Document # 3
at
org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.DataImportHandlerException.wrapAnd
Throw(DataImportHandlerException.java:72)
at
org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.XPathEntityProcessor$3.next(XPathE
ntityProcessor.java:504)
at
org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.XPathEntityProcessor$3.next(XPathE
ntityProcessor.java:517)
at
org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.EntityProcessorBase.getNext(Entity
ProcessorBase.java:120)
at
org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.XPathEntityProcessor.fetchNextRow(
XPathEntityProcessor.java:225)
at
org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.XPathEntityProcessor.nextRow(XPath
EntityProcessor.java:204)
at
org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.EntityProcessorWrapper.pullRow(Ent
ityProcessorWrapper.java:330)
at
org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.EntityProcessorWrapper.nextRow(Ent
ityProcessorWrapper.java:296)
at
org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.DocBuilder.buildDocument(DocBuilde
r.java:683)
at
org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.DocBuilder.buildDocument(DocBuilde
r.java:619)
... 5 more
Caused by: java.lang.RuntimeException:
com.ctc.wstx.exc.WstxParsingException: Un
declared general entity "uuml"
 at [row,col {unknown-source}]: [26,42]
at
org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.XPathRecordReader.streamRecords(XP
athRecordReader.java:187)
at
org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.XPathEntityProcessor$2.run(XPathEn
tityProcessor.java:427)
Caused by: com.ctc.wstx.exc.WstxParsingException: Undeclared general
entity "uum
l"
 at [row,col {unknown-source}]: [26,42]
at
com.ctc.wstx.sr.StreamScanner.constructWfcException(StreamScanner.jav
a:630)
at
com.ctc.wstx.sr.StreamScanner.throwParseError(StreamScanner.java:467)

at
com.ctc.wstx.sr.BasicStreamReader.handleUndeclaredEntity(BasicStreamR
eader.java:5431)
at
com.ctc.wstx.sr.StreamScanner.expandUnresolvedEntity(StreamScanner.ja
va:1661)
at
com.ctc.wstx.sr.StreamScanner.expandEntity(StreamScanner.java:1555)
at
com.ctc.wstx.sr.StreamScanner.fullyRe

Re: Solr 4.0 UI issue

[anarchos78]

Thank you for reply,

I didn't get you. What do you mean by saying: "so you may check the (raw)
log output ..". Please help!
Thank you in advance
Tom
Greece

--
View this message in context: 
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-4-0-UI-issue-tp3993286p3993427.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.