Re: [EXTERNAL] - Re: Solr not returning stored field
Pls unsubscribe me.
Thanks in Advance.
On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 2:30 PM Alexandre Rafalovitch
wrote:
>
> Half the time I end up using a "power hammer" for all sorts of small
> "nails".
>
> Specifically I use Wiresharm network tracer to see exactly what happens on
> wire level and what servers are involved.
>
> A true overkill but it would have worked here...
>
> Regards,
> Alex
>
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2019, 3:09 PM Erick Erickson,
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks for bringing closure, this was really puzzling. Don’t want to
> > mention how many times I’ve spent hours/days trying to understand something
> > only to finally figure out something similar ;).
> >
> > Best,
> > Erick
> >
> > > On Jun 27, 2019, at 11:53 AM, Steve Pruitt wrote:
> > >
> > > Ok. When something makes no sense. Go back to the very beginning. I
> > was using an out of date configuration file which pointed SolrJ to another
> > running Solr that had a core similar enough to the one running on localhost
> > that I could not see an issue... until I checked everything.
> > >
> > > All is good.
> > >
> > > -S
> > >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Steve Pruitt
> > > Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2019 2:46 PM
> > > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> > > Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] - Re: Solr not returning stored field
> > >
> > > Ok, I am totally confused.
> > >
> > > It works fine using Solr Admin console on some test cases. I set the fl
> > box with ranking reference and I get back both fields.
> > >
> > > For completeness, I clicked the url constructed for the query and it
> > works fine too.
> > > Example:
> > http://localhost:8983/solr/suggestion/select?fl=ranking%20reference&q=user:10456
> > >
> > > Here is the confusing part.
> > > I stepped through my code, as I looped through the returned documents I
> > copied the user value from the response and pasted user:value into the
> > Admin console and get no results. Yet, in my code using SolrQuery I see a
> > response for the same user:value with the ranking field.
> > >
> > > This makes no sense to me. The Admin console is usually the source of
> > truth. Why would I get no response from the console, but see a response
> > using SolrJ?
> > >
> > >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Alexandre Rafalovitch
> > > Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2019 1:44 PM
> > > To: solr-user
> > > Subject: [EXTERNAL] - Re: Solr not returning stored field
> > >
> > > (If no other SolrJ specific advice shows up)
> > >
> > > Can you divide the problem in a middle a see what happens and whether
> > the issue is Solr or SolrJ side.
> > >
> > > Specifically, execute the query directly against Solr and see what
> > happens.
> > >
> > > Also I would triple-check that the documents you are getting back
> > actually have the field. Sometimes not all documents do and the query
> > returns those wirhout first. Cross check by getting returned IDs and
> > looking up the full record directly in Solr.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >Alex
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jun 27, 2019, 1:37 PM Steve Pruitt,
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> I cannot get Solr to return a stored field.
> > >>
> > >> My schema is:
> > >>
> > >> :
> > >> > >> name="ranking" type="pdouble" indexed="false" stored="true"/> > >> name="reference" type="string" indexed="false" stored="true"/>
> > >> :
> > >>
> > >> I am using the SolrJ client and trying this:
> > >>
> > >> The query string contains = " user: " and a list of user field values;
> > >> The query executes ok. I get several documents.
> > >>
> > >> SolrQuery solrQuery = new SolrQuery(query);
> > >> solrQuery.setSort("ranking" , SolrQuery.ORDER.desc);
> > >> solrQuery.addField("ranking"); solrQuery.addField("reference");
> > >>
> > >> I also tried:
> > >>
> > >> solrQuery.setFields("ranking", " reference");
> > >>
> > >> But the result has only the "ranking" field.
> > >> Before explicitly setting the fields. All fields came back in
> > >> response except "reference".
> > >>
> >
> >
Re: Solr 7.5 - Indexing Failing due to "IndexWriter is Closed"
Please un-subscribe me. Thanks in Advance, Ashwin On Mon, Apr 1, 2019 at 5:54 PM Aroop Ganguly wrote: > > Hi Group > > I am facing this issue again.The stack mentions Heap space issue. > > Are the document sizes too big ? > > Not sure what I should be doing here; As on the solr admin ui I do not see > jvm being anywhere close to being full. > Any advise on this is greatly welcome. > > > Full Stack trace: > > 2019-04-01 22:13:54.833 ERROR (qtp484199463-773) > o.a.s.s.HttpSolrCall null:org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Server error > writing document id C9C280C4-B3B7-4BEE-9EA5-C4925F5092D9 to the index > at > org.apache.solr.update.DirectUpdateHandler2.addDoc(DirectUpdateHandler2.java:240) > at > org.apache.solr.update.processor.RunUpdateProcessor.processAdd(RunUpdateProcessorFactory.java:67) > at > org.apache.solr.update.processor.UpdateRequestProcessor.processAdd(UpdateRequestProcessor.java:55) > at > org.apache.solr.update.processor.DistributedUpdateProcessor.doLocalAdd(DistributedUpdateProcessor.java:970) > at > org.apache.solr.update.processor.DistributedUpdateProcessor.versionAdd(DistributedUpdateProcessor.java:1186) > at > org.apache.solr.update.processor.DistributedUpdateProcessor.processAdd(DistributedUpdateProcessor.java:653) > at > org.apache.solr.update.processor.LogUpdateProcessorFactory$LogUpdateProcessor.processAdd(LogUpdateProcessorFactory.java:103) > at > org.apache.solr.handler.loader.JavabinLoader$1.update(JavabinLoader.java:98) > at > org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.JavaBinUpdateRequestCodec$1.readOuterMostDocIterator(JavaBinUpdateRequestCodec.java:188) > at > org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.JavaBinUpdateRequestCodec$1.readIterator(JavaBinUpdateRequestCodec.java:144) > at > org.apache.solr.common.util.JavaBinCodec.readObject(JavaBinCodec.java:311) > at > org.apache.solr.common.util.JavaBinCodec.readVal(JavaBinCodec.java:256) > at > org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.JavaBinUpdateRequestCodec$1.readNamedList(JavaBinUpdateRequestCodec.java:130) > at > org.apache.solr.common.util.JavaBinCodec.readObject(JavaBinCodec.java:276) > at > org.apache.solr.common.util.JavaBinCodec.readVal(JavaBinCodec.java:256) > at > org.apache.solr.common.util.JavaBinCodec.unmarshal(JavaBinCodec.java:178) > at > org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.JavaBinUpdateRequestCodec.unmarshal(JavaBinUpdateRequestCodec.java:195) > at > org.apache.solr.handler.loader.JavabinLoader.parseAndLoadDocs(JavabinLoader.java:109) > at > org.apache.solr.handler.loader.JavabinLoader.load(JavabinLoader.java:55) > at > org.apache.solr.handler.UpdateRequestHandler$1.load(UpdateRequestHandler.java:97) > at > org.apache.solr.handler.ContentStreamHandlerBase.handleRequestBody(ContentStreamHandlerBase.java:68) > at > org.apache.solr.handler.RequestHandlerBase.handleRequest(RequestHandlerBase.java:199) > at org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore.execute(SolrCore.java:2541) > at org.apache.solr.servlet.HttpSolrCall.execute(HttpSolrCall.java:709) > at org.apache.solr.servlet.HttpSolrCall.call(HttpSolrCall.java:515) > at > org.apache.solr.servlet.SolrDispatchFilter.doFilter(SolrDispatchFilter.java:377) > at > org.apache.solr.servlet.SolrDispatchFilter.doFilter(SolrDispatchFilter.java:323) > at > org.eclipse.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler$CachedChain.doFilter(ServletHandler.java:1634) > at > org.eclipse.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler.doHandle(ServletHandler.java:533) > at > org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ScopedHandler.handle(ScopedHandler.java:146) > at > org.eclipse.jetty.security.SecurityHandler.handle(SecurityHandler.java:548) > at > org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.HandlerWrapper.handle(HandlerWrapper.java:132) > at > org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ScopedHandler.nextHandle(ScopedHandler.java:257) > at > org.eclipse.jetty.server.session.SessionHandler.doHandle(SessionHandler.java:1595) > at > org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ScopedHandler.nextHandle(ScopedHandler.java:255) > at > org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ContextHandler.doHandle(ContextHandler.java:1317) > at > org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ScopedHandler.nextScope(ScopedHandler.java:203) > at > org.eclipse.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler.doScope(ServletHandler.java:473) > at > org.eclipse.jetty.server.session.SessionHandler.doScope(SessionHandler.java:1564) > at > org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ScopedHandler.nextScope(ScopedHandler.java:201) > at > org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ContextHandler.doScope(ContextHandler.java:1219) > at > org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ScopedHandler.handle(ScopedHandler.java:144) > at > org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ContextHandlerCollection.handle(ContextHandle
Gracefully stopping jetty server - LockObtainFailedException
Hi, I have solr cloud(4.1) setup with embedded jetty server. I use the below command to start and stop the server. start server : nohup java -DSTOP.PORT=8085 -DSTOP.KEY= -DnumShards=2 -Dbootstrap_confdir=./solr/nlp/conf -Dcollection.configName=myconf -DzkHost=10.88.139.206:2181,10.88.139.206:2182,10.88.139.206:2183 -jar start.jar > output.log 2>&1 & Stop Server : java -DSTOP.PORT=8085 -DSTOP.KEY= -jar start.jar --stop What I have observed is once I stop the server and start again, while indexing it gives me 'org.apache.lucene.store.LockObtainFailedException: Lock obtain timed out:' with the 'NativeFSLock@solr /nlp/data/index.20130924205253479/write.lock' after I delete lock file manually and start the server, indexing works fine. Please let me know how we can resolve this. If this issue is answered earlier, I would appreciate pointing me to the url, tried finding it but could not. Thanks in Advance, Ashwin
Re: [JOB] Solr / Elasticsearch Engineer @ Sematext
Hi, I would like to apply for SEARCH CONSULTING & SEARCH SOLUTIONS ARCHITECT position. PFA my resume. You can reach me at 2019934403. Thanks, Ashwin cell - 2019934403 On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 4:17 PM, Otis Gospodnetic < otis.gospodne...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > If you are looking to work with Solr and Elasticsearch, among other > things, this may be for you: > > http://blog.sematext.com/2013/09/26/solr-elasticsearch-job-engineering/ > > This role offers a healthy mix of Solr/ES consulting, support, and > product development. > > Everything that might be of interest should be there, but I'll be > happy to answer any questions anyone may have off-list. > > Otis > -- > Solr & ElasticSearch Support -- http://sematext.com/ > Performance Monitoring -- http://sematext.com/spm > AshwinTandel.docx Description: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
(e)dismax Query Generation
Hi, Does Solr provides any java API/Client library to generate (e)dismax Query. for eg. using Java Code/API I wish to generate query like 'q=video&defType=edismax&qf=features^20.0+text^0.3&bq=cat:electronics^5.0' Thanks in Advance, Ashwin
Creating solr query.
Hi, It's with regards to generating a query string for Solr. I am looking for a solution where I can create the query string like 'q=name:ipod AND cat=music AND features=cool&facet=on&facet.field=cat' Is there any library through which we can create this query string. I came across Solrj but looks like it is not as reach as lucene API. Is there a way we can use lucene API and generate the query string or is there any other way. Thanks in Advance, Ashwin
Re: Questions on SOLR
Thanks Gora. On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Gora Mohanty wrote: > On 24 June 2013 23:14, Ashwin Tandel wrote: > > Hi, > > > > It's with regards to generating a query string for Solr. > > I am looking for a solution where I can create the query string like > > > > 'q=name:ipod AND cat=music AND features=cool&facet=on&facet.field=cat' > > > > I understand, we may not be able to use lucene query API directly . Is > > there any other library through which we can create this query string. > > > > I came across Solrj but looks like it is not as reach as lucene API. > > > > Is there a way we can use lucene API and generate the query string. > [...] > > Please do not hijack a thread, but start your own for a new > question, even if related to the subject at hand. > > Here is why thread hijacking is bad: > http://people.apache.org/~hossman/#threadhijack > > Regards, > Gora >
Re: Questions on SOLR
Hi, It's with regards to generating a query string for Solr. I am looking for a solution where I can create the query string like 'q=name:ipod AND cat=music AND features=cool&facet=on&facet.field=cat' I understand, we may not be able to use lucene query API directly . Is there any other library through which we can create this query string. I came across Solrj but looks like it is not as reach as lucene API. Is there a way we can use lucene API and generate the query string. Thanks in Advance, Ashwin On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 7:56 AM, Erik Hatcher wrote: > Inline below... > > On Jun 24, 2013, at 07:16 , heikki wrote: > > > hello, > > > > I'm a long-time user of Lucene, and have some questions about SOLR. > > > > 1. Is it possible to give actual Lucene queries to SOLR, bypassing any > > SOLR-side QueryParsing ? > > No, not directly as Query objects, but Solr's default query parser is > lucene syntax based, so any Lucene QueryParser syntax query can be used in > Solr. > > Since you've got Lucene API know-how, you could create a custom > QParser(Plugin) easily if you have a different syntax/format that you'd > like to use. > > > 2. Are there differences in functionality or implementation between > Faceted > > Search in Lucene and SOLR ? > > They are two entirely different codebases, no overlap whatsoever. I'm > sure the basic results are comparable, but I don't have experience with the > Lucene faceting module so I can't say what's different. > > > 3. Is it possible to use several indices (for different languages), and > > sometimes search only in one of them, sometimes (if user requested) > search > > in all of them having combined results (and relevancy calculated as if > it is > > a single index) ? > > Yes. You can create multiple Solr "cores" and query them individually or > as if they were one distributed collection (provided the schemas are > compatible). Regarding relevancy though, there still is an open issue to > implement distributed IDF, so it's not exactly as if it was a single index. > With different languages, you'll be using different fields anyway though, > so maybe the distributed IDF isn't an issue for you. > > But you could index all the documents, possibly, into the same index and > have a field that distinguishes the language and filter (or not) to query > in any combination. > > Erik > >
