Thanks David. Is there a reason we wouldn't want to base the Solr
implementation on the InetAddressPoint class?
https://lucene.apache.org/core/7_2_1/misc/org/apache/lucene/document/InetAddressPoint.html
I realize that is in the "misc" package for now, so it's not part of core
Lucene. But it is nice in that it has one class for both ipv4 and ipv6 and
it's based on point numerics rather than trie numerics which seem to be
deprecated. I'm pretty familiar with the code base, I could take a stab at
implementing this. I just wanted to make sure there wasn't something I was
missing since I couldn't find any discussion on this.
Michael Cooper
-Original Message-
From: David Smiley [mailto:david.w.smi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, March 23, 2018 5:14 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: InetAddressPoint support in Solr or other IP type?
Hi,
For IPv4, use TrieIntField with precisionStep=8
For IPv6 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6741 There's nothing
there yet; you could help out if you are familiar with the codebase. Or you
might try something relatively simple involving edge ngrams.
~ David
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 1:09 PM Mike Cooper wrote:
> I have scoured the web and cannot find any discussion of having the
> Lucene InetAddressPoint type exposed in Solr. Is there a reason this
> is omitted from the Solr supported types? Is it on the roadmap? Is
> there an alternative recommended way to index and store Ipv4 and Ipv6
> addresses for optimal range searches and subnet searches? Thanks for your
> help.
>
>
>
> *Michael Cooper*
>
--
Lucene/Solr Search Committer, Consultant, Developer, Author, Speaker
LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley | Book:
http://www.solrenterprisesearchserver.com
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
