Re: Can I combine standardtokenizer with solr.WordDelimiterFilterFactory?
Yes you can and I don't see any reason why you should not Le 01/11/2013 15:38, eShard a écrit : Good morning, Here's the issue: I have and ID that consists of two letters and a number. The whole user title looks like this: Lastname, Firstname (LA12345). Now, with my current configuration, I can search for LA12345 and find the user. However, when I type in just the number I get zero results. If I put a wildcard in (*12345) I find the correct record. The problem is I changed that user title to use the worddelimiterfitlerfactory and it seems to work. However, I also copy that field into the text field which just uses the standardtokenizer and I lose the ability to search for 12345 without a wildcard. My question is can (or should) I put the worddelimiterfactory in with the standardtokenizer in the text field? Or should I just use one or the other? Thank you, -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Can-I-combine-standardtokenizer-with-solr-WordDelimiterFilterFactory-tp4098814.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Boosting Documents
Oh thank you Chris, this is much clearer, and thank you for updating the Wiki too. On 05/22/2013 08:29 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote: : NOTE: make sure norms are enabled (omitNorms="false" in the schema.xml) for : any fields where the index-time boost should be stored. : : In my case where I only need to boost the whole document (not a specific : field), do I have to activate the << omitNorms="false" >> for all the fields : in the schema ? docBoost is really just syntactic sugar for a field boost on each field i the document -- it's factored into the norm value for each field in the document. (I'll update the wiki to make this more clear) If you do a query that doesn't utilize any field which has norms, then the docBoost you specified when indexing the document never comes into play. In general, doc boosts and field boosts, and the way they come into play as part of the field norm is fairly inflexible, and (in my opinion) antiquated. A much better way of dealing with this type of problem is also discussed in the section of the wiki you linked to. Imeediately below... http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrRelevancyFAQ#index-time_boosts ...you'll find... http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrRelevancyFAQ#Field_Based_Boosting -Hoss
Re: Regular expression in solr
There is no ^ or $ in the solr regex since the regular expression will match tokens (not the complete indexed text). So the results you get will basicly depend on your way of indexing, if you use the regex on a tokenized field and that is not what you want, try to use a copy field wich is not tokenized and then use the regex on that one. On 05/22/2013 11:53 AM, Stéphane Habett Roux wrote: I just can't get the $ endpoint to work. I am not sure but I heard it works with the Java Regex engine (a little obvious if it is true ...), so any Java regex tutorial would help you. On 05/22/2013 11:42 AM, Sagar Chaturvedi wrote: Yes, it works for me too. But many times result is not as expected. Is there some guide on use of regex in solr? -Original Message- From: Oussama Jilal [mailto:jilal.ouss...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 4:00 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Regular expression in solr I don't think so, it always worked for me without anything special, just try it and see :) On 05/22/2013 11:26 AM, Sagar Chaturvedi wrote: @Oussama Thank you for your reply. Is it as simple as that? I mean no additional settings required? -Original Message----- From: Oussama Jilal [mailto:jilal.ouss...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 3:37 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Regular expression in solr You can write a regular expression query like this (you need to specify the regex between slashes / ) : fieldName:/[rR]egular.*/ On 05/22/2013 10:51 AM, Sagar Chaturvedi wrote: Hi, How do we search based upon regular expressions in solr? Regards, Sagar DISCLAIMER: - - - The contents of this e-mail and any attachment(s) are confidential and intended for the named recipient(s) only. It shall not attach any liability on the originator or NEC or its affiliates. Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and may not necessarily reflect the opinions of NEC or its affiliates. Any form of reproduction, dissemination, copying, disclosure, modification, distribution and / or publication of this message without the prior written consent of the author of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error please delete it and notify the sender immediately. . - - - DISCLAIMER: -- - The contents of this e-mail and any attachment(s) are confidential and intended for the named recipient(s) only. It shall not attach any liability on the originator or NEC or its affiliates. Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and may not necessarily reflect the opinions of NEC or its affiliates. Any form of reproduction, dissemination, copying, disclosure, modification, distribution and / or publication of this message without the prior written consent of the author of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error please delete it and notify the sender immediately. . -- - DISCLAIMER: --- The contents of this e-mail and any attachment(s) are confidential and intended for the named recipient(s) only. It shall not attach any liability on the originator or NEC or its affiliates. Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and may not necessarily reflect the opinions of NEC or its affiliates. Any form of reproduction, dissemination, copying, disclosure, modification, distribution and / or publication of this message without the prior written consent of the author of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error please delete it and notify the sender immediately. . ---
Re: Boosting Documents
Ok thank you for your help, I think I will have to treat the problem in another way even if it will complicate things for me. thanks again On 05/22/2013 11:51 AM, Sandeep Mestry wrote: I'm running out of options now, can't really see the issue you're facing unless the debug analysis is posted. I think a thorough debugging is required from both application and solr level. If you want a customize scoring from Solr, you can also consider overriding DefaultSimilarity implementation - but that'll be a separate issue. On 22 May 2013 11:32, Oussama Jilal wrote: Yes I did debug it and there is nothing special about it, everything is treated the same, My Solr version is 4.2 The copy field is used because the 2 field are of different types but only one value is indexed in them (so no multiValue is required and it works perfectly). On 05/22/2013 11:18 AM, Sandeep Mestry wrote: Did you use the debugQuery=true in solr console to see how the query is being interpreted and the result calculation? Also, I'm not sure but this copyfield directive seems a bit confusing to me.. Because multiValued is false for Suggestion field so does that schema mean Suggestion has value only from Id and not from any other input? You haven't mentioned the version of Solr, can you also post the query params? On 22 May 2013 11:04, Oussama Jilal wrote: I don't know if this can help (since the document boost should be independent of any schema) but here is my schema : | Id Suggestion | My query is somthing like : Suggestion:"Olive Oil". The result is 9 documents, wich all has the same score "11.287682", even if they had been indexed with different boosts (I am sure of this). On 05/22/2013 10:54 AM, Sandeep Mestry wrote: I think that is applicable only for the field level boosting and not at document level boosting. Can you post your query, field definition and results you're expecting. I am using index and query time boosting without any issues so far. also which version of Solr you're using? On 22 May 2013 10:44, Oussama Jilal wrote: I don't know if this is the issue or not but, concidering this note from the wiki : NOTE: make sure norms are enabled (omitNorms="false" in the schema.xml) for any fields where the index-time boost should be stored. In my case where I only need to boost the whole document (not a specific field), do I have to activate the << omitNorms="false" >> for all the fields in the schema ? On 05/22/2013 10:41 AM, Oussama Jilal wrote: Thank you Sandeep, I did post the document like that (a minor difference is that I did not add the boost to the field since I don't want to boost on specific field, I boosted the whole document ' '), but the issue is that everything in the queries results has the same score even if they had been indexed with different boosts, and I can't sort on another field since this is independent from any field value. Any ideas ? On 05/22/2013 10:30 AM, Sandeep Mestry wrote: Hi Oussama, This is explained very nicely on Solr Wiki.. http://wiki.apache.org/solr/**SolrRelevancyFAQ#index-time_** boosts<http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrRelevancyFAQ#index-time_boosts> <http://wiki.apache.**org/solr/**SolrRelevancyFAQ#** index-time_**boosts<http://wiki.apache.org/solr/**SolrRelevancyFAQ#index-time_**boosts> <http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrRelevancyFAQ#index- time_boosts<http://wiki.apache.org/**solr/SolrRelevancyFAQ#index-**time_boosts> <http://wiki.**apache.org/solr/**SolrRelevancyFAQ#index-time_** boosts<http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrRelevancyFAQ#index-time_boosts> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/**UpdateXmlMessages#Optional_<http://wiki.apache.org/solr/UpdateXmlMessages#Optional_**> <http://wiki.apache.org/solr/UpdateXmlMessages#Optional_<http://wiki.apache.org/solr/**UpdateXmlMessages#Optional_**> attributes_for_.22add.22http://wiki.apache.org/solr/UpdateXmlMessages#Optional_attributes_for_.22add.22> All you need to do is something similar to below.. - 05991 Bridgewater What is not clear from your message is whether you need better scoring or better sorting. so, additionally, you can consider adding a secondary sort parameter for the docs having the same score. http
Re: synonym indexing in solr
Hello, I think that what is written about the SynonymFilterFactory in the wiki is well explained, so I will direct you there : http://wiki.apache.org/solr/AnalyzersTokenizersTokenFilters#solr.SynonymFilterFactory On 05/22/2013 11:44 AM, Sagar Chaturvedi wrote: Hi, Since synonym searching has some limitations in solr, so I wanted to know the procedure of Synonym indexing in solr? Please let me know if any guide is available for that. Regards, Sagar DISCLAIMER: --- The contents of this e-mail and any attachment(s) are confidential and intended for the named recipient(s) only. It shall not attach any liability on the originator or NEC or its affiliates. Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and may not necessarily reflect the opinions of NEC or its affiliates. Any form of reproduction, dissemination, copying, disclosure, modification, distribution and / or publication of this message without the prior written consent of the author of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error please delete it and notify the sender immediately. . ---
Re: Regular expression in solr
I am not sure but I heard it works with the Java Regex engine (a little obvious if it is true ...), so any Java regex tutorial would help you. On 05/22/2013 11:42 AM, Sagar Chaturvedi wrote: Yes, it works for me too. But many times result is not as expected. Is there some guide on use of regex in solr? -Original Message- From: Oussama Jilal [mailto:jilal.ouss...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 4:00 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Regular expression in solr I don't think so, it always worked for me without anything special, just try it and see :) On 05/22/2013 11:26 AM, Sagar Chaturvedi wrote: @Oussama Thank you for your reply. Is it as simple as that? I mean no additional settings required? -Original Message- From: Oussama Jilal [mailto:jilal.ouss...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 3:37 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Regular expression in solr You can write a regular expression query like this (you need to specify the regex between slashes / ) : fieldName:/[rR]egular.*/ On 05/22/2013 10:51 AM, Sagar Chaturvedi wrote: Hi, How do we search based upon regular expressions in solr? Regards, Sagar DISCLAIMER: - - - The contents of this e-mail and any attachment(s) are confidential and intended for the named recipient(s) only. It shall not attach any liability on the originator or NEC or its affiliates. Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and may not necessarily reflect the opinions of NEC or its affiliates. Any form of reproduction, dissemination, copying, disclosure, modification, distribution and / or publication of this message without the prior written consent of the author of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error please delete it and notify the sender immediately. . - - - DISCLAIMER: -- - The contents of this e-mail and any attachment(s) are confidential and intended for the named recipient(s) only. It shall not attach any liability on the originator or NEC or its affiliates. Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and may not necessarily reflect the opinions of NEC or its affiliates. Any form of reproduction, dissemination, copying, disclosure, modification, distribution and / or publication of this message without the prior written consent of the author of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error please delete it and notify the sender immediately. . -- - DISCLAIMER: --- The contents of this e-mail and any attachment(s) are confidential and intended for the named recipient(s) only. It shall not attach any liability on the originator or NEC or its affiliates. Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and may not necessarily reflect the opinions of NEC or its affiliates. Any form of reproduction, dissemination, copying, disclosure, modification, distribution and / or publication of this message without the prior written consent of the author of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error please delete it and notify the sender immediately. . ---
Re: Boosting Documents
Yes I did debug it and there is nothing special about it, everything is treated the same, My Solr version is 4.2 The copy field is used because the 2 field are of different types but only one value is indexed in them (so no multiValue is required and it works perfectly). On 05/22/2013 11:18 AM, Sandeep Mestry wrote: Did you use the debugQuery=true in solr console to see how the query is being interpreted and the result calculation? Also, I'm not sure but this copyfield directive seems a bit confusing to me.. Because multiValued is false for Suggestion field so does that schema mean Suggestion has value only from Id and not from any other input? You haven't mentioned the version of Solr, can you also post the query params? On 22 May 2013 11:04, Oussama Jilal wrote: I don't know if this can help (since the document boost should be independent of any schema) but here is my schema : | Id **Suggestion | My query is somthing like : Suggestion:"Olive Oil". The result is 9 documents, wich all has the same score "11.287682", even if they had been indexed with different boosts (I am sure of this). On 05/22/2013 10:54 AM, Sandeep Mestry wrote: I think that is applicable only for the field level boosting and not at document level boosting. Can you post your query, field definition and results you're expecting. I am using index and query time boosting without any issues so far. also which version of Solr you're using? On 22 May 2013 10:44, Oussama Jilal wrote: I don't know if this is the issue or not but, concidering this note from the wiki : NOTE: make sure norms are enabled (omitNorms="false" in the schema.xml) for any fields where the index-time boost should be stored. In my case where I only need to boost the whole document (not a specific field), do I have to activate the << omitNorms="false" >> for all the fields in the schema ? On 05/22/2013 10:41 AM, Oussama Jilal wrote: Thank you Sandeep, I did post the document like that (a minor difference is that I did not add the boost to the field since I don't want to boost on specific field, I boosted the whole document ' '), but the issue is that everything in the queries results has the same score even if they had been indexed with different boosts, and I can't sort on another field since this is independent from any field value. Any ideas ? On 05/22/2013 10:30 AM, Sandeep Mestry wrote: Hi Oussama, This is explained very nicely on Solr Wiki.. http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrRelevancyFAQ#index-time_boosts<http://wiki.apache.org/solr/**SolrRelevancyFAQ#index-time_**boosts> <http://wiki.apache.org/**solr/SolrRelevancyFAQ#index-**time_boosts<http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrRelevancyFAQ#index-time_boosts> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/UpdateXmlMessages#Optional_**<http://wiki.apache.org/solr/**UpdateXmlMessages#Optional_**> attributes_for_.22add.22http://wiki.apache.org/solr/UpdateXmlMessages#Optional_attributes_for_.22add.22> All you need to do is something similar to below.. - 05991 Bridgewater What is not clear from your message is whether you need better scoring or better sorting. so, additionally, you can consider adding a secondary sort parameter for the docs having the same score. http://wiki.apache.org/solr/CommonQueryParameters#sort<http://wiki.apache.org/solr/**CommonQueryParameters#sort> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/CommonQueryParameters#sort> HTH, Sandeep On 22 May 2013 09:21, Oussama Jilal wrote: Thank you for your reply bbarani, I can't do that because I want to boost some documents over others, independing of the query. On 05/21/2013 05:41 PM, bbarani wrote: Why don't you boost during query time? Something like q=superman&qf=title^2 subject You can refer: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/**SolrRelevancyFAQ<http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrRelevancyFAQ> <http://**wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrRelevancyFAQ<http://wiki.apache.org/solr/**SolrRelevancyFAQ> <http://wiki.**apache.org/**solr/**SolrRelevancyFAQ<http://apache.org/solr/**SolrRelevancyFAQ> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrRelevancyFAQ> -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.** nabble.com/Boosting-Documents-**tp4064955p4064966.html<http://nabble.com/Boosting-Documents-tp4064955p4064966
Re: Regular expression in solr
I don't think so, it always worked for me without anything special, just try it and see :) On 05/22/2013 11:26 AM, Sagar Chaturvedi wrote: @Oussama Thank you for your reply. Is it as simple as that? I mean no additional settings required? -Original Message- From: Oussama Jilal [mailto:jilal.ouss...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 3:37 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Regular expression in solr You can write a regular expression query like this (you need to specify the regex between slashes / ) : fieldName:/[rR]egular.*/ On 05/22/2013 10:51 AM, Sagar Chaturvedi wrote: Hi, How do we search based upon regular expressions in solr? Regards, Sagar DISCLAIMER: -- - The contents of this e-mail and any attachment(s) are confidential and intended for the named recipient(s) only. It shall not attach any liability on the originator or NEC or its affiliates. Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and may not necessarily reflect the opinions of NEC or its affiliates. Any form of reproduction, dissemination, copying, disclosure, modification, distribution and / or publication of this message without the prior written consent of the author of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error please delete it and notify the sender immediately. . -- - DISCLAIMER: --- The contents of this e-mail and any attachment(s) are confidential and intended for the named recipient(s) only. It shall not attach any liability on the originator or NEC or its affiliates. Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and may not necessarily reflect the opinions of NEC or its affiliates. Any form of reproduction, dissemination, copying, disclosure, modification, distribution and / or publication of this message without the prior written consent of the author of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error please delete it and notify the sender immediately. . ---
Re: Regular expression in solr
You can write a regular expression query like this (you need to specify the regex between slashes / ) : fieldName:/[rR]egular.*/ On 05/22/2013 10:51 AM, Sagar Chaturvedi wrote: Hi, How do we search based upon regular expressions in solr? Regards, Sagar DISCLAIMER: --- The contents of this e-mail and any attachment(s) are confidential and intended for the named recipient(s) only. It shall not attach any liability on the originator or NEC or its affiliates. Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and may not necessarily reflect the opinions of NEC or its affiliates. Any form of reproduction, dissemination, copying, disclosure, modification, distribution and / or publication of this message without the prior written consent of the author of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error please delete it and notify the sender immediately. . ---
Re: Boosting Documents
I don't know if this can help (since the document boost should be independent of any schema) but here is my schema : | Id Suggestion | My query is somthing like : Suggestion:"Olive Oil". The result is 9 documents, wich all has the same score "11.287682", even if they had been indexed with different boosts (I am sure of this). On 05/22/2013 10:54 AM, Sandeep Mestry wrote: I think that is applicable only for the field level boosting and not at document level boosting. Can you post your query, field definition and results you're expecting. I am using index and query time boosting without any issues so far. also which version of Solr you're using? On 22 May 2013 10:44, Oussama Jilal wrote: I don't know if this is the issue or not but, concidering this note from the wiki : NOTE: make sure norms are enabled (omitNorms="false" in the schema.xml) for any fields where the index-time boost should be stored. In my case where I only need to boost the whole document (not a specific field), do I have to activate the << omitNorms="false" >> for all the fields in the schema ? On 05/22/2013 10:41 AM, Oussama Jilal wrote: Thank you Sandeep, I did post the document like that (a minor difference is that I did not add the boost to the field since I don't want to boost on specific field, I boosted the whole document ' '), but the issue is that everything in the queries results has the same score even if they had been indexed with different boosts, and I can't sort on another field since this is independent from any field value. Any ideas ? On 05/22/2013 10:30 AM, Sandeep Mestry wrote: Hi Oussama, This is explained very nicely on Solr Wiki.. http://wiki.apache.org/solr/**SolrRelevancyFAQ#index-time_**boosts<http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrRelevancyFAQ#index-time_boosts> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/**UpdateXmlMessages#Optional_** attributes_for_.22add.22<http://wiki.apache.org/solr/UpdateXmlMessages#Optional_attributes_for_.22add.22> All you need to do is something similar to below.. - 05991 Bridgewater What is not clear from your message is whether you need better scoring or better sorting. so, additionally, you can consider adding a secondary sort parameter for the docs having the same score. http://wiki.apache.org/solr/**CommonQueryParameters#sort<http://wiki.apache.org/solr/CommonQueryParameters#sort> HTH, Sandeep On 22 May 2013 09:21, Oussama Jilal wrote: Thank you for your reply bbarani, I can't do that because I want to boost some documents over others, independing of the query. On 05/21/2013 05:41 PM, bbarani wrote: Why don't you boost during query time? Something like q=superman&qf=title^2 subject You can refer: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrRelevancyFAQ<http://wiki.apache.org/solr/**SolrRelevancyFAQ> <http://wiki.**apache.org/solr/**SolrRelevancyFAQ<http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrRelevancyFAQ> -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.** nabble.com/Boosting-Documents-tp4064955p4064966.html<http://nabble.com/Boosting-Documents-**tp4064955p4064966.html> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Boosting-Documents-tp4064955p4064966.html>> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Boosting Documents
I don't know if this is the issue or not but, concidering this note from the wiki : NOTE: make sure norms are enabled (omitNorms="false" in the schema.xml) for any fields where the index-time boost should be stored. In my case where I only need to boost the whole document (not a specific field), do I have to activate the << omitNorms="false" >> for all the fields in the schema ? On 05/22/2013 10:41 AM, Oussama Jilal wrote: Thank you Sandeep, I did post the document like that (a minor difference is that I did not add the boost to the field since I don't want to boost on specific field, I boosted the whole document ' '), but the issue is that everything in the queries results has the same score even if they had been indexed with different boosts, and I can't sort on another field since this is independent from any field value. Any ideas ? On 05/22/2013 10:30 AM, Sandeep Mestry wrote: Hi Oussama, This is explained very nicely on Solr Wiki.. http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrRelevancyFAQ#index-time_boosts http://wiki.apache.org/solr/UpdateXmlMessages#Optional_attributes_for_.22add.22 All you need to do is something similar to below.. - 05991 Bridgewater What is not clear from your message is whether you need better scoring or better sorting. so, additionally, you can consider adding a secondary sort parameter for the docs having the same score. http://wiki.apache.org/solr/CommonQueryParameters#sort HTH, Sandeep On 22 May 2013 09:21, Oussama Jilal wrote: Thank you for your reply bbarani, I can't do that because I want to boost some documents over others, independing of the query. On 05/21/2013 05:41 PM, bbarani wrote: Why don't you boost during query time? Something like q=superman&qf=title^2 subject You can refer: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/**SolrRelevancyFAQ<http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrRelevancyFAQ> -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.** nabble.com/Boosting-Documents-**tp4064955p4064966.html<http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Boosting-Documents-tp4064955p4064966.html> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Boosting Documents
Thank you Sandeep, I did post the document like that (a minor difference is that I did not add the boost to the field since I don't want to boost on specific field, I boosted the whole document ' '), but the issue is that everything in the queries results has the same score even if they had been indexed with different boosts, and I can't sort on another field since this is independent from any field value. Any ideas ? On 05/22/2013 10:30 AM, Sandeep Mestry wrote: Hi Oussama, This is explained very nicely on Solr Wiki.. http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrRelevancyFAQ#index-time_boosts http://wiki.apache.org/solr/UpdateXmlMessages#Optional_attributes_for_.22add.22 All you need to do is something similar to below.. - 05991 Bridgewater What is not clear from your message is whether you need better scoring or better sorting. so, additionally, you can consider adding a secondary sort parameter for the docs having the same score. http://wiki.apache.org/solr/CommonQueryParameters#sort HTH, Sandeep On 22 May 2013 09:21, Oussama Jilal wrote: Thank you for your reply bbarani, I can't do that because I want to boost some documents over others, independing of the query. On 05/21/2013 05:41 PM, bbarani wrote: Why don't you boost during query time? Something like q=superman&qf=title^2 subject You can refer: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/**SolrRelevancyFAQ<http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrRelevancyFAQ> -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.** nabble.com/Boosting-Documents-**tp4064955p4064966.html<http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Boosting-Documents-tp4064955p4064966.html> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Boosting Documents
Thank you for your reply bbarani, I can't do that because I want to boost some documents over others, independing of the query. On 05/21/2013 05:41 PM, bbarani wrote: Why don't you boost during query time? Something like q=superman&qf=title^2 subject You can refer: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrRelevancyFAQ -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Boosting-Documents-tp4064955p4064966.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Boosting Documents
Hi everyone, I have a small (I hope) issue, and I wish someone could point me to the right direction. I have been indexing some documents using Solr 4.1 and specifying different "boost"s for different types of documents (boost for the whole document). But when searching, I noticed that the scores are the same for all of them and that affected the order (not what I wanted). Does anyone, know if I have to configure something else or what ? I have been using Solr for quite some time (more than a year) but I never used the boosting feature. Thanks.
Re: Paging and sorting in Solr
I am sure it does the sorting first (since I always done that). On 04/18/2013 02:49 PM, hassancrowdc wrote: I have done paging using solr rows and start query attributes. But now it shows me result with that is sorted page wise. I meant if i have the following scenario: rows=25&start=0&sort=manufacturer asc It will give me first 25 matching results and then sort only those. I want it to sort all the results first and then apply rows and start. How can i do that? -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Paging-and-sorting-in-Solr-tp4057000.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Oussama Jilal
Re: Query with whitespace
Didn't know ! thank you Shown :) On 03/01/2013 09:23 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote: On 3/1/2013 1:50 PM, Jilal Oussama wrote: You can also specify in you schema that the default query operator is AND. This is deprecated as of Solr 4.0, so I don't mention it. -- Oussama Jilal
Re: Get search results in the order of fields names searched
I think this can be achieved by boosting the fields and then sorting by the score. http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrRelevancyFAQ#Field_Based_Boosting On 02/26/2013 01:55 PM, David Philip wrote: Hi Team, Is it possible to get search results in the order of fields names set? Ex: say, - I have 3 fields : Author, Editors, Raw_text, - User searched for keyword: "John Hopkins", - Search query is : q= (Author: "John Hopkins" OR Editors:"John Hopkins" OR Raw_Text:"John Hopkins") Expected result: Result should be returned such that it should first get all the documents which had "John hopkins" in field author and then the documents which had "John Hopkins" in Editors and then in documents which had John Hopkins in Raw_text. So if keyword is there in the main field author, it should get that document first followed by editor and raw text. John Hopkins test test test Mr. John Hopkins book Micheal Ranold John Hopkins, Micheal, Martin Micheal is the main author, John Hopkins is co-author Feymenn Micheal, Martin John Hopkins -- Oussama Jilal
Re: Can't search words in quotes
The pattern you are using in the PatternTokenizerFactory does not contain double quotes, so indexing the text "The Promulgation of Universal Peace" will results in the following tokens : "The / Promulgation / of / Universal / Peace", that's why Peace will not match Peace". On 02/26/2013 08:08 AM, Alex Cougarman wrote: Hi. We have run into an interesting situation when searching for words that are within double-quotes in our documents. For example, when we enter the following search: promulgation AND peace The document in question has this text exactly (with the double quotes): "The Promulgation of Universal Peace" However, it finds and highlights the word Promulgation but not the word Peace Here's the field's definition in our schema.xml: Warm regards, Alex Cougarman Bahá'í World Centre Haifa, Israel Office: +972-4-835-8683 Cell: +972-54-241-4742 acoug...@bwc.org<mailto:acoug...@bwc.org> -- Oussama Jilal
Re: Solr Grouping and empty fields
Ok, Thank you all for precious help :) On 02/24/2013 04:37 PM, Teun Duynstee wrote: That would depend on your indexing setup. We have a custom application for indexing, so we just make a value up. In our case a GUID (UUID). But I imagine that you could also just copy your id field with a prefix. It depends on your data and tools. Teun Op 24 feb. 2013 15:00 schreef "Jilal Oussama" het volgende: Oh this is a good one ! Thank you very much Teun (But I will have to ask you how do you generate a unique value for the copy field when the original one is empty? Do you do this manualy or solr can do it?) And thanks again. On Feb 24, 2013 12:11 PM, "Teun Duynstee" wrote: We had a comparable situation. We created an extra field and at index time copy the value if there is one and create a unique dummy value if there is none. We couldn't just make the initial field required, because it has a meaning other than just a grouping key. Teun Op 22 feb. 2013 20:47 schreef "Daniel Collins" het volgende: We had something similar to be fair, a cluster information field which was unfortunately optional, so all the documents that didn't have this field set grouped together. It isn't Solr's fault, to be fair, we told it to group on the values of field Z, null is a valid value and lots of documents have that value so they all group together. We got what we asked for :-) Our solution was to make that field mandatory, and in our indexing pipeline we will set that field to some unique value (same as the document key if necessary) if it isn't set already to ensure that every document has that field set appropriately. -Original Message- From: Oussama Jilal Sent: Friday, February 22, 2013 5:25 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Solr Grouping and empty fields OK I'm sorry if I did not explained well my need. I'll try to give a better explanation. What I have : Millions of documents that have a field X , another field Y and another field Z which is not required (So it can be empty in some documents and not in others). What I want to do : Search for docs that have the field X equals something and group them by field Z (so that only 1 document is returned for every field Z value), BUT I want documents who have field Z as empty to be included in the results (all of them), and sort the results by field Y (so I can't separate the request into two requests). I hope that this is clearer. On 02/22/2013 03:59 PM, Jack Krupansky wrote: What?!?! You want them grouped but not grouped together?? What on earth does that mean?! I mean, either they are included or they are not. All results will be in some group, so where exactly do you want these "not to be grouped together" documents to be grouped? In any case, please clarify what your expectations really are. -- Jack Krupansky -Original Message- From: Oussama Jilal Sent: Friday, February 22, 2013 7:17 AM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Solr Grouping and empty fields Thank you Johannes, but I want the documents having the field empty to be included in the results, just not to be grouped together, and if I understood your solution correctly, it will simply remove those documents from the results (Note : The field values are very variable and unknown to me). On 02/22/2013 02:53 PM, Johannes Rodenwald wrote: Hi Oussama, If you have only a few distinct, unchanging values in the field that you group upon, you could implement a FilterQuery (query parameter "fq") and add it to the query, allowing all valid values, but not an empty field. For example: fq=my_grouping_string_field:( value_a OR value_b OR value_c OR value_d ) If you use SOLR 4.x, you should be able to group upon an integer field, allowing a range filter: (I still work with 3.6 which can only group on string fields, so i didnt test this one) fq=my_grouping_integer_field:[**1 TO *] -- Johannes Rodenwald - Ursprüngliche Mail - Von: "Oussama Jilal" An: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Gesendet: Freitag, 22. Februar 2013 12:32:13 Betreff: Solr Grouping and empty fields Hi, I need to group some results in solr based on a field, but I don't want documents having that field empty to be grouped together, does anyone know how to achieve that ? -- Oussama Jilal -- Oussama Jilal
Re: Solr Grouping and empty fields
OK I'm sorry if I did not explained well my need. I'll try to give a better explanation. What I have : Millions of documents that have a field X , another field Y and another field Z which is not required (So it can be empty in some documents and not in others). What I want to do : Search for docs that have the field X equals something and group them by field Z (so that only 1 document is returned for every field Z value), BUT I want documents who have field Z as empty to be included in the results (all of them), and sort the results by field Y (so I can't separate the request into two requests). I hope that this is clearer. On 02/22/2013 03:59 PM, Jack Krupansky wrote: What?!?! You want them grouped but not grouped together?? What on earth does that mean?! I mean, either they are included or they are not. All results will be in some group, so where exactly do you want these "not to be grouped together" documents to be grouped? In any case, please clarify what your expectations really are. -- Jack Krupansky -Original Message- From: Oussama Jilal Sent: Friday, February 22, 2013 7:17 AM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Solr Grouping and empty fields Thank you Johannes, but I want the documents having the field empty to be included in the results, just not to be grouped together, and if I understood your solution correctly, it will simply remove those documents from the results (Note : The field values are very variable and unknown to me). On 02/22/2013 02:53 PM, Johannes Rodenwald wrote: Hi Oussama, If you have only a few distinct, unchanging values in the field that you group upon, you could implement a FilterQuery (query parameter "fq") and add it to the query, allowing all valid values, but not an empty field. For example: fq=my_grouping_string_field:( value_a OR value_b OR value_c OR value_d ) If you use SOLR 4.x, you should be able to group upon an integer field, allowing a range filter: (I still work with 3.6 which can only group on string fields, so i didnt test this one) fq=my_grouping_integer_field:[1 TO *] -- Johannes Rodenwald ----- Ursprüngliche Mail - Von: "Oussama Jilal" An: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Gesendet: Freitag, 22. Februar 2013 12:32:13 Betreff: Solr Grouping and empty fields Hi, I need to group some results in solr based on a field, but I don't want documents having that field empty to be grouped together, does anyone know how to achieve that ? -- Oussama Jilal
Re: Solr Grouping and empty fields
Thank you Johannes, but I want the documents having the field empty to be included in the results, just not to be grouped together, and if I understood your solution correctly, it will simply remove those documents from the results (Note : The field values are very variable and unknown to me). On 02/22/2013 02:53 PM, Johannes Rodenwald wrote: Hi Oussama, If you have only a few distinct, unchanging values in the field that you group upon, you could implement a FilterQuery (query parameter "fq") and add it to the query, allowing all valid values, but not an empty field. For example: fq=my_grouping_string_field:( value_a OR value_b OR value_c OR value_d ) If you use SOLR 4.x, you should be able to group upon an integer field, allowing a range filter: (I still work with 3.6 which can only group on string fields, so i didnt test this one) fq=my_grouping_integer_field:[1 TO *] -- Johannes Rodenwald - Ursprüngliche Mail ----- Von: "Oussama Jilal" An: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Gesendet: Freitag, 22. Februar 2013 12:32:13 Betreff: Solr Grouping and empty fields Hi, I need to group some results in solr based on a field, but I don't want documents having that field empty to be grouped together, does anyone know how to achieve that ? -- Oussama Jilal
Solr Grouping and empty fields
Hi, I need to group some results in solr based on a field, but I don't want documents having that field empty to be grouped together, does anyone know how to achieve that ? -- Oussama Jilal
