How to integrate sen and lucene-ja in SOLR 3.x

2012-05-01 Thread Shanmugavel SRD
Hi,
  Can anyone help me on how to integrate sen and lucene-ja.jar in SOLR 3.4
or 3.5 or 3.6 version?
Thanks,
Shanmugavel

--
View this message in context: 
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/How-to-integrate-sen-and-lucene-ja-in-SOLR-3-x-tp3953266.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


Re: Search for empty string in 1.4.1 vs 3.4

2011-09-28 Thread Shanmugavel SRD
Thank you for the reply Chris.
Please find the sample query which is returning results even though id is
not having any value as  in SOLR 1.4.1

http://localhost/solr/online/select/?q=%28%20state%20%29^1.8%20AND%20%20%28%20%28id:%22%22%29%29%20AND%20%20%28%20%28content_type_s:%22Video%22%29^1.5%20%29

PS: id is multivalued=false. Any field with multivalued as false works like
this {returning results on search of } in SOLR 1.4.1. But at the same time
q=id: is not returning any results in SOLR 1.4.1. This problem happens
when there is AND clause with id:

--
View this message in context: 
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Search-for-empty-string-in-1-4-1-vs-3-4-tp3358444p3375436.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


Search for empty string in 1.4.1 vs 3.4

2011-09-22 Thread Shanmugavel SRD
Hi,
  I am using SOLR 1.4.1. When I search for empty string in a string field,
q=tag_facet:, it return documents with values in tag_facet.
  When I use the same query q=tag_facet:, in SOLR 3.4, it is returning
only documents with  string in tag_facet. 
  SOLR 3.4 works as expected. I just want to know whether it is an issue in
SOLR 1.4.1. Please advise.

--
View this message in context: 
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Search-for-empty-string-in-1-4-1-vs-3-4-tp3358444p3358444.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


How to convert date/timestamp to long in data-config.xml

2011-05-06 Thread Shanmugavel SRD
SOLR : 1.4.1
There are 1,300,000+ documents in the index. Sorting on a date field with
timestamp leads to OutOfMemoryError. So, we are looking for a way to copy
the timestamp as a long value to a field and sort based on that field. Can
any one help me on how to convert the timestamp to a long value in
data-config.xml? Is there any existing transformer?

--
View this message in context: 
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/How-to-convert-date-timestamp-to-long-in-data-config-xml-tp2907125p2907125.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


Re: How to find Master Slave are in sync

2011-01-27 Thread Shanmugavel SRD

Markus,
  The problem here is if I call the below two URLs immediately after
replication then I am getting both the index versions as same. In my python
script I have added code to swap the online core on master with offline core
on master and online core on slave with offline core on slave, if both the
versions are same. After calling swap, I am getting error in slave's log
like below. 
  So I am confused why this is happening. Can you please help me on this?

 http://master_host:port/solr/replication?command=indexversion
 http://slave_host:port/solr/replication?command=details


2011-01-27 07:45:26,713 WARN  [org.apache.solr.handler.SnapPuller]
(Thread-59) No content recieved for file: {size=154098810, name=_e3.cfx,
lastmodified=1296132092000}
2011-01-27 07:45:27,396 ERROR [org.apache.solr.handler.ReplicationHandler]
(Thread-59) SnapPull failed

org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Unable to download _e3.cfx
completely. Downloaded 0!=154098810
at
org.apache.solr.handler.SnapPuller$FileFetcher.cleanup(SnapPuller.java:1026)
at
org.apache.solr.handler.SnapPuller$FileFetcher.fetchFile(SnapPuller.java:906)
at
org.apache.solr.handler.SnapPuller.downloadIndexFiles(SnapPuller.java:541)
at
org.apache.solr.handler.SnapPuller.fetchLatestIndex(SnapPuller.java:294)

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/How-to-find-Master-Slave-are-in-sync-tp2287014p2362679.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


How to find Master Slave are in sync

2011-01-19 Thread Shanmugavel SRD

How to find Master  Slave are in sync?
Is there a way apart from checking the index version of master and slave
using below two HTTP APIs?

http://master_host:port/solr/replication?command=indexversion
http://slave_host:port/solr/replication?command=details
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/How-to-find-Master-Slave-are-in-sync-tp2287014p2287014.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


Re: schema.xml in other than conf folder

2011-01-12 Thread Shanmugavel SRD

Hi,
  These two links helped me to solve the problem.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1154
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrReplication#enable.2BAC8-disable_master.2BAC8-slave_in_a_node
Thanks,
SRD
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/schema-xml-in-other-than-conf-folder-tp2206587p2241266.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


Re: schema.xml in other than conf folder

2011-01-10 Thread Shanmugavel SRD

Chris,
   Our solr conf folder is in read-only file system. But the data directory
(index) is not in read-only file system. As per our production environment
guidelines, the configuration files should be in read-only file system.
Thanks,
SRD
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/schema-xml-in-other-than-conf-folder-tp2206587p2225625.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


schema.xml in other than conf folder

2011-01-06 Thread Shanmugavel SRD

I want to place the schema.xml in a place other than conf folder. Is it
possible?
This is as part of master and slave configuration. I want to place all the
files which will be common between master and slave in a particular
location.
Can anyone help me on this?

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/schema-xml-in-other-than-conf-folder-tp2206587p2206587.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


Re: schema.xml in other than conf folder

2011-01-06 Thread Shanmugavel SRD

Erick,
  Thanks for your response. Our production environment is a read only file
system. It is not allowing to modify or create new files under conf folder
at runtime. So copy config through replication is not working for us.
Thanks,
SRD
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/schema-xml-in-other-than-conf-folder-tp2206587p2210108.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


Re: Query performance issue while using EdgeNGram

2010-12-22 Thread Shanmugavel SRD

1) Thanks for this update. I have to use 'WhiteSpaceTokenizer'
2) I have to suggest the whole query itself (Say name or title)
3) Could you please let me know if there is a way to find the evicted docs?
4) Yes, we are seeing improvement in the response time if we optimize. But
still for some queries QTime is more than 8 secs. It is a 'Blocker' for us.
Could you please suggest any to reduce the QTime to 1 secs.
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Query-performance-issue-while-using-EdgeNGram-tp2097056p2130751.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


SOLR 1.4.1 : Indexing DateField time zone problem

2010-11-25 Thread Shanmugavel SRD

I am using SOLR 1.4.1. My SOLR runs in a server which is in EST zone.
I am trying to index a date field which is in MySQL as
'2007-08-08T05:36:50Z' but while indexing it becomes '2007-08-08T09:36:50Z'
where 4 hours got increased. But I want the date as is while indexing,
means, after indexing I want the value as '2007-08-08T05:36:50Z' in
'modified_d' field.

Can anyone help me on this?

field column=post_modified name=modified_d
dateTimeFormat=-MM-dd'T'hh:mm:ss'Z' /

I searched in this forum and there are discussions on this same problem but
on SOLR 1.3, that's why I am posting this query again.
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SOLR-1-4-1-Indexing-DateField-time-zone-problem-tp1966118p1966118.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


Re: copyField is not tokenizing the values at index time

2010-11-23 Thread Shanmugavel SRD

Thanks Erick.
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/copyField-is-not-tokenizing-the-values-at-index-time-tp1952756p1958946.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


Re: Spell-Check Component Functionality

2010-11-21 Thread Shanmugavel SRD

SOLR wiki page is the best place to find that.

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3004823/solr-spellcheck-configuration
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SpellCheckerRequestHandler
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SpellCheckComponent
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Spell-Check-Component-Functionality-tp1923954p1944011.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


Re: Meaning of avgTimePerRequest avgRequestsPerSecond in SOLR stats page

2010-11-19 Thread Shanmugavel SRD

Thanks Erick.
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Meaning-of-avgTimePerRequest-avgRequestsPerSecond-in-SOLR-stats-page-tp1922692p1932275.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


Re: Meaning of avgTimePerRequest avgRequestsPerSecond in SOLR stats page

2010-11-18 Thread Shanmugavel SRD

Erick,
   Thanks a lot for explaining about these two fields.
   Could you please let us know which one we have to look for if we have to
monitor the performance? avgTimePerRequest OR avgRequestsPerSecond.

Thanks,
SRD
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Meaning-of-avgTimePerRequest-avgRequestsPerSecond-in-SOLR-stats-page-tp1922692p1925407.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


Re: Spell-Check Component Functionality

2010-11-18 Thread Shanmugavel SRD

Did you configure below one in your default request handler? 
arr name=last-components
  strspellcheck/str
/arr 
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Spell-Check-Component-Functionality-tp1923954p1929124.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


Re: DateFormatTransformer issue with value 0000-00-00T00:00:00Z

2010-11-17 Thread Shanmugavel SRD

Thanks for your reply.
I am indexing docs in XML using DIH. I am not using MySQL to import data.
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/DateFormatTransformer-issue-with-value--00-00T00-00-00Z-tp1910644p1916712.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


Re: DateFormatTransformer issue with value 0000-00-00T00:00:00Z

2010-11-17 Thread Shanmugavel SRD

I tried this in JAVA where the SOLR runs. Is it problem due to the encoding?

Code:

GregorianCalendar calendar = new
GregorianCalendar(TimeZone.getTimeZone(US/Eastern), Locale.US);
System.out.println(calendar.getTime());
calendar.set(0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0);
System.out.println(calendar.getTime());
System.out.println(System property: +System.getProperty(file.encoding));


Output:

Thu Nov 18 02:13:00 EST 2010
Wed Dec 31 00:00:00 EST 2
System property: UTF-8

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/DateFormatTransformer-issue-with-value--00-00T00-00-00Z-tp1910644p1922354.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


DateFormatTransformer issue with value 0000-00-00T00:00:00Z

2010-11-16 Thread Shanmugavel SRD

Hi,
   I am having a field as below in my feed.
field name=published_from_dt-00-00T00:00:00Z/field

   I have configured the field as below in data-config.xml.
field column=published_from_dt
xpath=/add/doc/fie...@name='published_from_dt']
dateTimeFormat=-MM-dd'T'hh:mm:ss'Z' / 

   But after indexing, the field value becomes like this
date name=published_from_dt0002-11-30T00:00:00Z/date

   I want to have the value as '-00-00T00:00:00Z' after indexing also.
Could anyone help on this? 

PS: I am using solr 1.4.1
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/DateFormatTransformer-issue-with-value--00-00T00-00-00Z-tp1910644p1910644.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


Re: Index time boosting is not working with boosting value in document level

2010-10-13 Thread Shanmugavel SRD

Thanks Iorixxx... Boosting is working while using DIH to import XML.

Thanks,
SRD
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Index-time-boosting-is-not-working-with-boosting-value-in-document-level-tp1649072p1693423.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


Re: Index time boosting is not working with boosting value in document level

2010-10-12 Thread Shanmugavel SRD

Thanks a ton Eric and Iorixxx.
Since I used DIH to import XML data, boosting was not reflected in score.
When I used /update to import XML data, boosting was considered for scoring
and able to see the intended data on top 10 results.
Could you please let me know how to make boosting value to be reflected in
score while using DIH to index XML docs?
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Index-time-boosting-is-not-working-with-boosting-value-in-document-level-tp1649072p1686445.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


Re: Index time boosting is not working with boosting value in document level

2010-10-11 Thread Shanmugavel SRD

Eric,
   Score is not coming properly even after giving boost value in document
and field level.
   Please find the solrconfig.xml, schema.xml, data-config.xml, the feed and
the score  query.
   Doc with id 'ABCDEF/L' is boosted and doc with id 'MA147LL/A' is not
boosted, but both are returning same score - 0.1942141.
   Could you please help me to find where I did a mistake?

solrconfig.xml

config
  updateHandler class=solr.DirectUpdateHandler2 /

  requestDispatcher handleSelect=true 
requestParsers enableRemoteStreaming=false
multipartUploadLimitInKB=2048 /
  /requestDispatcher
  !-- requestHandler name=standard class=solr.SearchHandler
default=true / --
  
requestHandler name=/dataimport
class=org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.DataImportHandler
lst name=defaults
str name=configdata-config.xml/str 
/lst
   /requestHandler
  requestHandler name=standard class=solr.StandardRequestHandler
default=true /
  requestHandler name=/update class=solr.XmlUpdateRequestHandler /
  requestHandler name=/admin/
class=org.apache.solr.handler.admin.AdminHandlers /
  
  !-- config for the admin interface -- 
  admin
defaultQuerysolr/defaultQuery
  /admin

/config

schema.xml

schema name=example core zero version=1.1
  types
   fieldtype name=string  class=solr.StrField sortMissingLast=true
omitNorms=false/
   fieldType name=text class=solr.TextField positionIncrementGap=100
omitNorms=false
  analyzer type=index
tokenizer class=solr.StandardTokenizerFactory/
filter class=solr.SynonymFilterFactory synonyms=synonyms.txt
ignoreCase=true expand=true/
filter class=solr.WordDelimiterFilterFactory
generateWordParts=1 generateNumberParts=1 catenateWords=1
catenateNumbers=1 catenateAll=0 splitOnCaseChange=1/
filter class=solr.StopFilterFactory ignoreCase=true
words=stopwords.txt/
filter class=solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory/
!-- filter class=solr.EnglishPorterFilterFactory
protected=protwords.txt/ --
filter class=solr.RemoveDuplicatesTokenFilterFactory/
  /analyzer
  analyzer type=query
tokenizer class=solr.StandardTokenizerFactory/
!--filter class=solr.SynonymFilterFactory synonyms=synonyms.txt
ignoreCase=true expand=false/--
filter class=solr.WordDelimiterFilterFactory
generateWordParts=1 generateNumberParts=1 catenateWords=0
catenateNumbers=0 catenateAll=0 splitOnCaseChange=1/
filter class=solr.StopFilterFactory ignoreCase=true
words=stopwords.txt/
filter class=solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory/
!-- filter class=solr.EnglishPorterFilterFactory
protected=protwords.txt/ --
filter class=solr.RemoveDuplicatesTokenFilterFactory/
  /analyzer
/fieldType
  /types

 fields   
  !-- general --
  field name=id  type=string   indexed=true  stored=true 
multiValued=false required=true/
  field name=typetype=string   indexed=true  stored=true 
multiValued=false / 
  field name=nametype=text   indexed=true  stored=true 
multiValued=false omitNorms=false/ 
  field name=core0   type=string   indexed=true  stored=true 
multiValued=false / 
 /fields

 !-- field to use to determine and enforce document uniqueness. --
 uniqueKeyid/uniqueKey

 !-- field for the QueryParser to use when an explicit fieldname is absent
--
 defaultSearchFieldname/defaultSearchField

 !-- SolrQueryParser configuration: defaultOperator=AND|OR --
 solrQueryParser defaultOperator=OR/
/schema

data-config.xml

dataConfig
dataSource type=HttpDataSource name=http encoding=UTF-8
connectionTimeout=3 readTimeout=6/
dataSource type=FileDataSource name=file encoding=UTF-8
connectionTimeout=3 readTimeout=6/
document
entity name=musicplayer
dataSource=file
url=\home\srd\exampledocs\ipod_other.xml 
processor=XPathEntityProcessor 
useSolrAddSchema=false
stream=true 
forEach=/add/doc/ 
pk=id 
transformer=DateFormatTransformer 

field column=id xpath=/add/doc/fie...@name='id']  /
field column=name xpath=/add/doc/fie...@name='name']  /
/entity
/document
/dataConfig

feed

add

doc
  field name=idF8V7067-APL-KIT/field
  field name=nameBelkin Mobile Power Cord for iPod w/ Dock/field
/doc

doc
  field name=idIW-02/field
  field name=nameiPod amp; iPod Mini USB 2.0 Cable/field
/doc

doc
  field name=idMA147LL/A/field
  field name=nameApple 60 GB iPod with Video Playback Black/field
/doc

doc boost=17.7
  field name=idABCDEF/L/field
  field name=name boost=7.17Apple 60 GB iPod with Video Playback
Black/field
/doc

/add

Query  Response

http://localhost:8080/solr/core0/select/?q=ipodversion=2.2start=0rows=10indent=onfl=score

response
lst name=responseHeader
int name=status0/int
int name=QTime15/int
/lst
result name=response numFound=4 start=0 maxScore=0.27466023
doc
float name=score0.27466023/float
str name=idIW-02/str
str name=nameiPod  iPod Mini USB 2.0 Cable/str
/doc
doc
float name=score0.24276763/float
str name=idF8V7067-APL-KIT/str
str name=nameBelkin Mobile Power Cord for iPod w/ 

Re: SOLR 1.4.1 to SOLR 1.3 issues (backward compatability issue)

2010-10-08 Thread Shanmugavel SRD

Thank you Otis. It solved the problem.
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SOLR-1-4-1-to-SOLR-1-3-issues-backward-compatability-issue-tp1649789p1664057.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


Index time boosting is not working with boosting value in document level

2010-10-07 Thread Shanmugavel SRD

We are having 10 documents (all 10 documents with name_s=john) with
boosting value 10.0 in doc level out of 100 documents.
DataImportHandler is used to index the documents in xml.
We gave omitNorms=false in a field called text and having schema.xml
configured as below.
Default query field is text, when i use q=john at query time the documents
which are having boosting is not coming in first 10 results. However the max
score for the query q=john is coming as 2.621

Could anyone help on this issue?


fields

field name=text type=text indexed=true stored=false
multiValued=true omitNorms=false/
dynamicField name=*_t  type=textindexed=true  stored=true
multiValued=true/
dynamicField name=*_s  type=string  indexed=true  stored=true
multiValued=true/

/fields

copyField source=name_s dest=name_t/
copyField source=*_t dest=text/
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Index-time-boosting-is-not-working-with-boosting-value-in-document-level-tp1649072p1649072.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


SOLR 1.4.1 to SOLR 1.3 issues (backward compatability issue)

2010-10-07 Thread Shanmugavel SRD

When I tried to roll back from SOLR 1.4.1 to SOLR 1.3, I am unable to view
the admin page alone rest of the functionality are fine.
I removed the index folder before reverting back to SOLR 1.3. 
Does any one have answer for this?
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SOLR-1-4-1-to-SOLR-1-3-issues-backward-compatability-issue-tp1649789p1649789.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


Re: SOLR 1.4.1 to SOLR 1.3 issues (backward compatability issue)

2010-10-07 Thread Shanmugavel SRD

Thank you Otis. I will try these steps.
Yes, it is not about indexing issue. Index and search functionality are
working fine. Only admin page is not accessible.
There is a process in our company to look for the roll back option while
moving any changes to LIVE/Production. As part of that we found this issue.

Thanks,
SRD
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SOLR-1-4-1-to-SOLR-1-3-issues-backward-compatability-issue-tp1649789p1663704.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.