Thanks for the quick response, Grant.
We tried it and it seems to work.
The confusion stemmed from the fact that the wiki states that the parameter is
not used - there are also comments in the test cases for the handler that say:
//TODO: stop using locally defined fields once stream.file and stream.body
start working everywhere
So wanted to confirm.
From: gsing...@apache.org
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: ExtractingRequestHandler and local files
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 14:50:43 -0400
I haven't tried it, but I thought the enableRemoteStreaming stuff
should work. That stuff is handled by Solr in other places, if I
recall correctly. Have you tried it?
-Grant
On Jun 9, 2009, at 2:28 PM, doraiswamy thirumalai wrote:
Hi,
I would greatly appreciate a quick response to this question.
Is there a means of passing a local file to the
ExtractingRequestHandler (as the enableRemoteStreaming/stream.file
option does with the other handlers) so the file contents can
directly be read from the local disk versus going over HTTP?
Per the Solr wiki entry for ExtractingRequestHandler,
enableRemoteStreaming is not used?
This is also a tad confusing because the Ruby example off:
http://www.lucidimagination.com/blog/2009/02/17/acts_as_solr_cell/
explicitly recommends setting this parameter?
Thanks!
_
Lauren found her dream laptop. Find the PC that’s right for you.
http://www.microsoft.com/windows/choosepc/?ocid=ftp_val_wl_290
--
Grant Ingersoll
http://www.lucidimagination.com/
Search the Lucene ecosystem (Lucene/Solr/Nutch/Mahout/Tika/Droids)
using Solr/Lucene:
http://www.lucidimagination.com/search
_
Windows Live™ SkyDrive™: Get 25 GB of free online storage.
http://windowslive.com/online/skydrive?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_SD_25GB_062009