Re: Solrj possible deadlock
Well, in the same processes I am using a jdbc connection to get all the relative paths to the documents I want to index, then I parse the documents to plain text using tones of open source libraries like POI, PFDBox etc.(which might account for java2d) then I add them to the index and commit every 2000 documents. I write a db row for each row I index so I can resume where I left off after a crash or exception. My app will happily index for hours then after it hangs, the resumed indexing run will only last a few additional minutes! The thread dumps look the same. Cheers. ryantxu wrote: do you have anything custom going on? The fact that the lock is in java2d seems suspicious... On Sep 23, 2009, at 7:01 PM, pof wrote: I had the same problem again yesterday except the process halted after about 20mins this time. pof wrote: Hello, I was running a batch index the other day using the Solrj EmbeddedSolrServer when the process abruptly froze in it's tracks after running for about 4-5 hours and indexing ~400K documents. There were no document locks so it would seem likely that there was some kind of thread deadlock. I was hoping someone might be able to tell me some information about the following thread dump taken at the time: Full thread dump OpenJDK Client VM (1.6.0-b09 mixed mode): DestroyJavaVM prio=10 tid=0x9322a800 nid=0xcef waiting on condition [0x..0x0018a044] java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE Java2D Disposer daemon prio=10 tid=0x0a28cc00 nid=0xf1c in Object.wait() [0x0311d000..0x0311def4] java.lang.Thread.State: WAITING (on object monitor) at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method) - waiting on 0x97a96840 (a java.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue $Lock) at java.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue.remove(ReferenceQueue.java: 133) - locked 0x97a96840 (a java.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue$Lock) at java.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue.remove(ReferenceQueue.java: 149) at sun.java2d.Disposer.run(Disposer.java:143) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:636) pool-1-thread-1 prio=10 tid=0x93a26c00 nid=0xcf7 waiting on condition [0x08a6a000..0x08a6b074] java.lang.Thread.State: WAITING (parking) at sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method) - parking to wait for 0x967acfd0 (a java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer $ConditionObject) at java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.park(LockSupport.java:186) at java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer $ConditionObject.await(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:1978) at java .util.concurrent.LinkedBlockingQueue.take(LinkedBlockingQueue.java: 386) at java .util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.getTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java: 1043) at java .util .concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java: 1103) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor $Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:603) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:636) Low Memory Detector daemon prio=10 tid=0x93a00c00 nid=0xcf5 runnable [0x..0x] java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE CompilerThread0 daemon prio=10 tid=0x09fe9800 nid=0xcf4 waiting on condition [0x..0x096a7af4] java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE Signal Dispatcher daemon prio=10 tid=0x09fe8800 nid=0xcf3 waiting on condition [0x..0x] java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE Finalizer daemon prio=10 tid=0x09fd7000 nid=0xcf2 in Object.wait() [0x005ca000..0x005caef4] java.lang.Thread.State: WAITING (on object monitor) at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method) - waiting on 0x966e6d40 (a java.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue $Lock) at java.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue.remove(ReferenceQueue.java: 133) - locked 0x966e6d40 (a java.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue$Lock) at java.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue.remove(ReferenceQueue.java: 149) at java.lang.ref.Finalizer $FinalizerThread.run(Finalizer.java:177) Reference Handler daemon prio=10 tid=0x09fd2c00 nid=0xcf1 in Object.wait() [0x00579000..0x00579d74] java.lang.Thread.State: WAITING (on object monitor) at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method) - waiting on 0x966e6dc8 (a java.lang.ref.Reference$Lock) at java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:502) at java.lang.ref.Reference$ReferenceHandler.run(Reference.java:133) - locked 0x966e6dc8 (a java.lang.ref.Reference$Lock) VM Thread prio=10 tid=0x09fcf800 nid=0xcf0 runnable VM Periodic Task Thread prio=10 tid=0x93a02400 nid=0xcf6 waiting on condition JNI global references: 1072 Heap def new generation total 36288K, used 23695K [0x93f1, 0x9667, 0x9667) eden space 32256K, 73% used [0x93f1, 0x95633f60, 0x95e9) from space 4032K, 0% used [0x95e9, 0x95e9, 0x9628) to space 4032K, 0% used [0x9628, 0x9628, 0x9667) tenured generation total 483968K, used 72129K
Re: Solrj possible deadlock
I had the same problem again yesterday except the process halted after about 20mins this time. pof wrote: Hello, I was running a batch index the other day using the Solrj EmbeddedSolrServer when the process abruptly froze in it's tracks after running for about 4-5 hours and indexing ~400K documents. There were no document locks so it would seem likely that there was some kind of thread deadlock. I was hoping someone might be able to tell me some information about the following thread dump taken at the time: Full thread dump OpenJDK Client VM (1.6.0-b09 mixed mode): DestroyJavaVM prio=10 tid=0x9322a800 nid=0xcef waiting on condition [0x..0x0018a044] java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE Java2D Disposer daemon prio=10 tid=0x0a28cc00 nid=0xf1c in Object.wait() [0x0311d000..0x0311def4] java.lang.Thread.State: WAITING (on object monitor) at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method) - waiting on 0x97a96840 (a java.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue$Lock) at java.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue.remove(ReferenceQueue.java:133) - locked 0x97a96840 (a java.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue$Lock) at java.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue.remove(ReferenceQueue.java:149) at sun.java2d.Disposer.run(Disposer.java:143) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:636) pool-1-thread-1 prio=10 tid=0x93a26c00 nid=0xcf7 waiting on condition [0x08a6a000..0x08a6b074] java.lang.Thread.State: WAITING (parking) at sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method) - parking to wait for 0x967acfd0 (a java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject) at java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.park(LockSupport.java:186) at java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.await(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:1978) at java.util.concurrent.LinkedBlockingQueue.take(LinkedBlockingQueue.java:386) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.getTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1043) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1103) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:603) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:636) Low Memory Detector daemon prio=10 tid=0x93a00c00 nid=0xcf5 runnable [0x..0x] java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE CompilerThread0 daemon prio=10 tid=0x09fe9800 nid=0xcf4 waiting on condition [0x..0x096a7af4] java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE Signal Dispatcher daemon prio=10 tid=0x09fe8800 nid=0xcf3 waiting on condition [0x..0x] java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE Finalizer daemon prio=10 tid=0x09fd7000 nid=0xcf2 in Object.wait() [0x005ca000..0x005caef4] java.lang.Thread.State: WAITING (on object monitor) at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method) - waiting on 0x966e6d40 (a java.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue$Lock) at java.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue.remove(ReferenceQueue.java:133) - locked 0x966e6d40 (a java.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue$Lock) at java.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue.remove(ReferenceQueue.java:149) at java.lang.ref.Finalizer$FinalizerThread.run(Finalizer.java:177) Reference Handler daemon prio=10 tid=0x09fd2c00 nid=0xcf1 in Object.wait() [0x00579000..0x00579d74] java.lang.Thread.State: WAITING (on object monitor) at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method) - waiting on 0x966e6dc8 (a java.lang.ref.Reference$Lock) at java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:502) at java.lang.ref.Reference$ReferenceHandler.run(Reference.java:133) - locked 0x966e6dc8 (a java.lang.ref.Reference$Lock) VM Thread prio=10 tid=0x09fcf800 nid=0xcf0 runnable VM Periodic Task Thread prio=10 tid=0x93a02400 nid=0xcf6 waiting on condition JNI global references: 1072 Heap def new generation total 36288K, used 23695K [0x93f1, 0x9667, 0x9667) eden space 32256K, 73% used [0x93f1, 0x95633f60, 0x95e9) from space 4032K, 0% used [0x95e9, 0x95e9, 0x9628) to space 4032K, 0% used [0x9628, 0x9628, 0x9667) tenured generation total 483968K, used 72129K [0x9667, 0xb3f1, 0xb3f1) the space 483968K, 14% used [0x9667, 0x9ace04b8, 0x9ace0600, 0xb3f1) compacting perm gen total 23040K, used 22983K [0xb3f1, 0xb559, 0xb7f1) the space 23040K, 99% used [0xb3f1, 0xb5581ff8, 0xb5582000, 0xb559) No shared spaces configured. Cheers. Brett. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Solrj-possible-deadlock-tp25530146p25531321.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Solrj possible deadlock
Hello, I was running a batch index the other day using the Solrj EmbeddedSolrServer when the process abruptly froze in it's tracks after running for about 4-5 hours and indexing ~400K documents. There were no document locks so it would seem likely that there was some kind of thread deadlock. I was hoping someone might be able to tell me some information about the following thread dump taken at the time: Full thread dump OpenJDK Client VM (1.6.0-b09 mixed mode): DestroyJavaVM prio=10 tid=0x9322a800 nid=0xcef waiting on condition [0x..0x0018a044] java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE Java2D Disposer daemon prio=10 tid=0x0a28cc00 nid=0xf1c in Object.wait() [0x0311d000..0x0311def4] java.lang.Thread.State: WAITING (on object monitor) at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method) - waiting on 0x97a96840 (a java.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue$Lock) at java.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue.remove(ReferenceQueue.java:133) - locked 0x97a96840 (a java.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue$Lock) at java.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue.remove(ReferenceQueue.java:149) at sun.java2d.Disposer.run(Disposer.java:143) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:636) pool-1-thread-1 prio=10 tid=0x93a26c00 nid=0xcf7 waiting on condition [0x08a6a000..0x08a6b074] java.lang.Thread.State: WAITING (parking) at sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method) - parking to wait for 0x967acfd0 (a java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject) at java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.park(LockSupport.java:186) at java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.await(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:1978) at java.util.concurrent.LinkedBlockingQueue.take(LinkedBlockingQueue.java:386) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.getTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1043) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1103) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:603) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:636) Low Memory Detector daemon prio=10 tid=0x93a00c00 nid=0xcf5 runnable [0x..0x] java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE CompilerThread0 daemon prio=10 tid=0x09fe9800 nid=0xcf4 waiting on condition [0x..0x096a7af4] java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE Signal Dispatcher daemon prio=10 tid=0x09fe8800 nid=0xcf3 waiting on condition [0x..0x] java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE Finalizer daemon prio=10 tid=0x09fd7000 nid=0xcf2 in Object.wait() [0x005ca000..0x005caef4] java.lang.Thread.State: WAITING (on object monitor) at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method) - waiting on 0x966e6d40 (a java.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue$Lock) at java.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue.remove(ReferenceQueue.java:133) - locked 0x966e6d40 (a java.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue$Lock) at java.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue.remove(ReferenceQueue.java:149) at java.lang.ref.Finalizer$FinalizerThread.run(Finalizer.java:177) Reference Handler daemon prio=10 tid=0x09fd2c00 nid=0xcf1 in Object.wait() [0x00579000..0x00579d74] java.lang.Thread.State: WAITING (on object monitor) at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method) - waiting on 0x966e6dc8 (a java.lang.ref.Reference$Lock) at java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:502) at java.lang.ref.Reference$ReferenceHandler.run(Reference.java:133) - locked 0x966e6dc8 (a java.lang.ref.Reference$Lock) VM Thread prio=10 tid=0x09fcf800 nid=0xcf0 runnable VM Periodic Task Thread prio=10 tid=0x93a02400 nid=0xcf6 waiting on condition JNI global references: 1072 Heap def new generation total 36288K, used 23695K [0x93f1, 0x9667, 0x9667) eden space 32256K, 73% used [0x93f1, 0x95633f60, 0x95e9) from space 4032K, 0% used [0x95e9, 0x95e9, 0x9628) to space 4032K, 0% used [0x9628, 0x9628, 0x9667) tenured generation total 483968K, used 72129K [0x9667, 0xb3f1, 0xb3f1) the space 483968K, 14% used [0x9667, 0x9ace04b8, 0x9ace0600, 0xb3f1) compacting perm gen total 23040K, used 22983K [0xb3f1, 0xb559, 0xb7f1) the space 23040K, 99% used [0xb3f1, 0xb5581ff8, 0xb5582000, 0xb559) No shared spaces configured. Cheers. Brett. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Solrj-possible-deadlock-tp25530146p25530146.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Regarding Response Builder
I would just do something like this: String myParam = req.getParams().get(xparam); where xparam is: http://localhost:8983/solr/select/?q=dogxparam=somethingstart=0rows=10indent=on Kartik1 wrote: The responsebuiilder class has SolrQueryRequest as public type. Using SolrQueryRequest we can get a list of SolrParams like SolrParams params = req.getParams(); Now I want to get the values of those params. What should be the approach as SolrParams is an abstract class and its get(String) method is abstract? Best regards, Amandeep Singh -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Regarding-Response-Builder-tp24456722p24600481.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
DocList Pagination
Hi, I am try to get the next DocList page in my custom search component. Could I get a code example of this? Cheers. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/DocList-Pagination-tp24581850p24581850.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Solr 1.4 Release Date
Any updates on this? Cheers. Gurjot Singh wrote: Hi, I am curious to know when is the scheduled/tentative release date of Solr 1.4. Thanks, Gurjot -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Solr-1.4-Release-Date-tp23260381p24473570.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Deleting from SolrQueryResponse
hossman wrote: one thing to keep in mind however is that post-processing a DocList to filter stuff out is almost never a good idea -- things get really convoluted when you think about dealing with pagination and except for some really trivial use cases you can never know what your upper bound should be when deciding how many hits to request from underlying IndexSearcher. You're usually better off restructuring your problem so that you can construct a Query/Filter/DocSet that you want to filter by first and *then* executing the search to generate the DocList in a single pass. I was wanting to edit the DocList in a custom SearchComponent to be executed after the QueryComponent. I do not require facetting etc. If do not want facetted results, will I still need to take any special steps not to break the doclist? hossman wrote: PS: replying to your own message (or reposting it) to bump it up generally doesn't encourage replies any faster -- it just increases the volume of traffic on the list, and if anything antagonizes people and makes them less interested in responding. Okay, sorry I wasn't certain on the protocol on that. Thanks, Brett. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Deleting-from-SolrQueryResponse-tp24266686p24315607.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Deleting from SolrQueryResponse
Hi, I was wondering if any has had luck deleting added documents to SolrQueryResponse? I am subclassing StandardRequestHandler and after I run the handle request body method (super.handleRequestBody(req, rsp);) I won't to filter out some of the hits. Thanks. Brett -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Deleting-from-SolrQueryResponse-tp24266686p24266686.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Deleting from SolrQueryResponse
This thread got buried last night, so... bump. pof wrote: Hi, I was wondering if any has had luck deleting added documents from SolrQueryResponse? I am subclassing StandardRequestHandler and after I run the handle request body method (super.handleRequestBody(req, rsp);) I want to filter out some of the hits. Thanks. Brett -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Deleting-from-SolrQueryResponse-tp24266686p24281972.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Getting hits in RequestHandler
Hi, I am writing my own request handler and I was wondering how I go about get a list of hits back. Thanks. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Getting-hits-in-RequestHandler-tp24248810p24248810.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Solr document security
I want to use filtering or similar, any help?
Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
That URL to your Solr Admin page should never be exposed to the outside
world. You can play with network, routing, DNS and other similar things
to make sure one can't get to this from the outside even if the URL is
know.
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
From: pof melbournebeerba...@gmail.com
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2009 7:40:12 PM
Subject: Re: Solr document security
Thats what I was going to do originally, however what is stopping a user
from
simply running a search through http://localhost:8983/solr/admin/ of the
index server?
Norberto Meijome-6 wrote:
On Wed, 24 Jun 2009 23:20:26 -0700 (PDT)
pof wrote:
Hi, I am wanting to add document-level security that works as
following:
An
external process makes a query to the index, depending on their
security
allowences based of a login id a list of hits are returned minus any
the
user are meant to know even exist. I was thinking maybe a custom
filter
with
a JDBC connection to check security of the user vs. the document. I'm
not
sure how I would add the filter or how to write the filter or how to
get
the
login id from a GET parameter. Any suggestions, comments etc.?
Hi Brett,
(keeping in mind that i've been away from SOLR for 8 months, but i
dont think this was added of late)
standard approach is to manage security @ your
application layer, not @ SOLR. ie, search, return documents (which
should
contain some kind of data to identify their ACL ) and then you can
decide
whether to show it or not.
HIH
_
{Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome
They never open their mouths without subtracting from the sum of human
knowledge. Thomas Brackett Reed
I speak for myself, not my employer. Contents may be hot. Slippery when
wet.
Reading disclaimers makes you go blind. Writing them is worse. You have
been
Warned.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Solr-document-security-tp24197620p24212752.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Solr-document-security-tp24197620p24246624.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Solr document security
The custom dispatcher filter example on
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrSecurity seems to be what I need however I
don't understand the code. Could someone break it down for me? Thanks.
pof wrote:
I want to use filtering or similar, any help?
Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
That URL to your Solr Admin page should never be exposed to the outside
world. You can play with network, routing, DNS and other similar things
to make sure one can't get to this from the outside even if the URL is
know.
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
From: pof melbournebeerba...@gmail.com
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2009 7:40:12 PM
Subject: Re: Solr document security
Thats what I was going to do originally, however what is stopping a user
from
simply running a search through http://localhost:8983/solr/admin/ of the
index server?
Norberto Meijome-6 wrote:
On Wed, 24 Jun 2009 23:20:26 -0700 (PDT)
pof wrote:
Hi, I am wanting to add document-level security that works as
following:
An
external process makes a query to the index, depending on their
security
allowences based of a login id a list of hits are returned minus any
the
user are meant to know even exist. I was thinking maybe a custom
filter
with
a JDBC connection to check security of the user vs. the document. I'm
not
sure how I would add the filter or how to write the filter or how to
get
the
login id from a GET parameter. Any suggestions, comments etc.?
Hi Brett,
(keeping in mind that i've been away from SOLR for 8 months, but i
dont think this was added of late)
standard approach is to manage security @ your
application layer, not @ SOLR. ie, search, return documents (which
should
contain some kind of data to identify their ACL ) and then you can
decide
whether to show it or not.
HIH
_
{Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome
They never open their mouths without subtracting from the sum of
human
knowledge. Thomas Brackett Reed
I speak for myself, not my employer. Contents may be hot. Slippery
when
wet.
Reading disclaimers makes you go blind. Writing them is worse. You
have
been
Warned.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Solr-document-security-tp24197620p24212752.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Solr-document-security-tp24197620p24246685.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Solr document security
Hi, I am wanting to add document-level security that works as following: An external process makes a query to the index, depending on their security allowences based of a login id a list of hits are returned minus any the user are meant to know even exist. I was thinking maybe a custom filter with a JDBC connection to check security of the user vs. the document. I'm not sure how I would add the filter or how to write the filter or how to get the login id from a GET parameter. Any suggestions, comments etc.? Thanks. Brett. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Solr-document-security-tp24197620p24197620.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Solr document security
Thats what I was going to do originally, however what is stopping a user from
simply running a search through http://localhost:8983/solr/admin/ of the
index server?
Norberto Meijome-6 wrote:
On Wed, 24 Jun 2009 23:20:26 -0700 (PDT)
pof melbournebeerba...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, I am wanting to add document-level security that works as following:
An
external process makes a query to the index, depending on their security
allowences based of a login id a list of hits are returned minus any the
user are meant to know even exist. I was thinking maybe a custom filter
with
a JDBC connection to check security of the user vs. the document. I'm not
sure how I would add the filter or how to write the filter or how to get
the
login id from a GET parameter. Any suggestions, comments etc.?
Hi Brett,
(keeping in mind that i've been away from SOLR for 8 months, but i
dont think this was added of late)
standard approach is to manage security @ your
application layer, not @ SOLR. ie, search, return documents (which should
contain some kind of data to identify their ACL ) and then you can decide
whether to show it or not.
HIH
_
{Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome
They never open their mouths without subtracting from the sum of human
knowledge. Thomas Brackett Reed
I speak for myself, not my employer. Contents may be hot. Slippery when
wet.
Reading disclaimers makes you go blind. Writing them is worse. You have
been
Warned.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Solr-document-security-tp24197620p24212752.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Solrj no search results
Hi, I'm using an EmbeddedSolrServer. Adding documents with the example jetty server example using this method worked fine: doc1.addField( id, id1); doc1.addField( name, doc1); doc1.addField( price, 10); server.add(doc1) However now I have changed the schema.xml so I can use my own fields and the documents will add to index (no compilation errors), however I will not get any search results back what so ever. Any Ideas? Thanks. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Solrj-no-search-results-tp24179484p24179484.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Solr Jetty confusion
Hi, the problem was my xml configurations. I am now using a java process (seperate from the webserver) using the EmbeddedSolrServer method and post a commit to the webserver at the end to sync the two cores which seems to work well for me. Thanks for the help. Development Team wrote: Hi Brett, Well, I'm running Solr in Jetty with JBoss, so I used the JBoss method of specifying properties (properties-service.xml). However, you can supply the solr-home to the command-line when you start Jetty by using a parameter like, -Dsolr.solr.home=C:\solr. You can do it like how they do it for Tomcat: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrTomcat?highlight=(solr.home) You mention your code is not compiling... the code should be able to compile whether or not you can actually start solr with the right solr-home. It should also compile regardless of how what container you deploy Solr into. What exactly are you trying to do besides getting Solr to start in Jetty? - Daryl. On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 9:58 PM, pof melbournebeerba...@gmail.com wrote: Development Team wrote: To specify the solr-home I use a Java system property (instead of the JNDI way) since I already have other necessary system properties for my apps. Could you please give me a concrete example of how you did this? There is no example code or commandline examples to be found. Cheers, Brett. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Solr-Jetty-confusion-tp24087264p24104378.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Solr-Jetty-confusion-tp24087264p24142282.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Sorlj when to commit?
Hi, I am doing a large batch (thousands) of insertions to my index using an EmbeddedSolrServer. I was wondering how often should I use server.commit() as I am trying to avoid unecessary bottlenecks. Thanks, Brett. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Sorlj-when-to-commit--tp24142326p24142326.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Solr Jetty confusion
Hi, I am currently trying to write a Jetty embedded java app that implements SOLR and uses SOLRJ by excepting posts telling it to do a batch index, or a deletion or what have you. At this point I am completely lost trying to follow http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrJetty . In my constructor I am doing the following call: Server server = new Server(); XmlConfiguration configuration = new XmlConfiguration(new FileInputStream(solrjetty.xml)); My xml has two calls, an addConnector to configure the port etc. and the addWebApplication as specified on the solr wiki. When running the app I get this: Exception in thread main java.lang.IllegalStateException: No Method: Call name=addWebApplicationArg/solr/*/ArgArg/webapps/solr.war/ArgSet name=extractWARtrue/SetSet name=defaultsDescriptororg/mortbay/jetty/servlet/webdefault.xml/SetCall name=addEnvEntryArg/solr/home/ArgArg type=String/solr/home/Arg/Call/Call on class org.mortbay.jetty.Server Can anyone point me in the right direction? Thanks. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Solr-Jetty-confusion-tp24087264p24087264.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Solr Jetty confusion
My problem is that my project doesn't compile and I have know way of knowing if I'm on the right track code wise. There just isn't any comprehensive guide out there for having a solr/jetty app. Development Team wrote: Hey, So... I'm assuming your problem is that you're having trouble deploying Solr in Jetty? Or is your problem that it's deploying just fine but your code throws an exception when you try to run it? I am running Solr in Jetty, and I just copied the war into the webapps directory and it worked. It was accessible under /solr, and it was accessible under the port that Jetty has as its HTTP listener (which is probably 8080 by default, but probably won't be 8983). To specify the solr-home I use a Java system property (instead of the JNDI way) since I already have other necessary system properties for my apps. So if your problem turns out to be with the JNDI, sorry I won't be of much help. Hope that helps... - Daryl. On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 2:44 AM, pof melbournebeerba...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I am currently trying to write a Jetty embedded java app that implements SOLR and uses SOLRJ by excepting posts telling it to do a batch index, or a deletion or what have you. At this point I am completely lost trying to follow http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrJetty . In my constructor I am doing the following call: Server server = new Server(); XmlConfiguration configuration = new XmlConfiguration(new FileInputStream(solrjetty.xml)); My xml has two calls, an addConnector to configure the port etc. and the addWebApplication as specified on the solr wiki. When running the app I get this: Exception in thread main java.lang.IllegalStateException: No Method: Call name=addWebApplicationArg/solr/*/ArgArg/webapps/solr.war/ArgSet name=extractWARtrue/SetSet name=defaultsDescriptororg/mortbay/jetty/servlet/webdefault.xml/SetCall name=addEnvEntryArg/solr/home/ArgArg type=String/solr/home/Arg/Call/Call on class org.mortbay.jetty.Server Can anyone point me in the right direction? Thanks. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Solr-Jetty-confusion-tp24087264p24087264.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Solr-Jetty-confusion-tp24087264p24099696.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Solr Jetty confusion
Development Team wrote: To specify the solr-home I use a Java system property (instead of the JNDI way) since I already have other necessary system properties for my apps. Could you please give me a concrete example of how you did this? There is no example code or commandline examples to be found. Cheers, Brett. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Solr-Jetty-confusion-tp24087264p24104378.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
EmbeddedSolrServer seperate process
Hi, one question: Will EmbeddedSolrServer work on a seperate java process than the solr servlet(start.jar) as long as it is run on the same machine? Thanks. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/EmbeddedSolrServer-seperate-process-tp24046680p24046680.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: EmbeddedSolrServer seperate process
It certain does, thank you. Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote: On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 8:15 AM, pof melbournebeerba...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, one question: Will EmbeddedSolrServer work on a seperate java process than the solr servlet(start.jar) as long as it is run on the same machine? EmbeddedSolrServer is run in the same process as the application which uses it. CommonsHttpSolrServer is used by an application to communicate with Solr running in a separate host (or JVM) using HTTP. The start.jar is the jetty servlet container which can be used to host solr. Does that answer your question? -- Regards, Shalin Shekhar Mangar. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/EmbeddedSolrServer-seperate-process-tp24046680p24047849.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
