Boosting a field with defType:dismax -- No results at all

2013-10-16 Thread uwe72
Hi there,

i want to boost a field, see below.

If i add the defType:dismax i don't get results at all anymore.

What i am doing wrong?

Regards
Uwe

requestHandler name=/select class=solr.SearchHandler
lst name=defaults
str name=omitHeadertrue/str
str name=dftext/str
str name=q.opAND/str


str name=spellcheck.dictionarydefault/str

str name=spellchecktrue/str
str name=spellcheck.extendedResultstrue/str
str name=spellcheck.count1/str

str name=spellcheck.maxResultsForSuggest100/str
str name=spellcheck.collatetrue/str
str name=spellcheck.collateExtendedResultstrue/str
str name=spellcheck.maxCollations1/str


str name=defTypedismax/str
str name=qf
   SignalImpl.baureihe^1011 text^0.1
/str




/lst
arr name=last-components
strspellcheck/str
/arr
/requestHandler



--
View this message in context: 
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Boosting-a-field-with-defType-dismax-No-results-at-all-tp4095850.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


AW: Boosting a field with defType:dismax -- No results at all

2013-10-16 Thread uwe72
Perfect!!! THANKS A LOT

 

That was the mistake.

 

Von: Jack Krupansky-2 [via Lucene]
[mailto:ml-node+s472066n409590...@n3.nabble.com] 
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 16. Oktober 2013 14:55
An: uwe72
Betreff: Re: Boosting a field with defType:dismax -- No results at all

 

Get rid of the newlines before and after the value of the qf parameter. 

-- Jack Krupansky 

-Original Message- 
From: uwe72 
Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2013 5:36 AM 
To: [hidden email] 
Subject: Boosting a field with defType:dismax -- No results at all 

Hi there, 

i want to boost a field, see below. 

If i add the defType:dismax i don't get results at all anymore. 

What i am doing wrong? 

Regards 
Uwe 

requestHandler name=/select class=solr.SearchHandler 
lst name=defaults 
str name=omitHeadertrue/str 
str name=dftext/str 
str name=q.opAND/str 


str name=spellcheck.dictionarydefault/str 

str name=spellchecktrue/str 
str name=spellcheck.extendedResultstrue/str 
str name=spellcheck.count1/str 

str name=spellcheck.maxResultsForSuggest100/str 
str name=spellcheck.collatetrue/str 
str name=spellcheck.collateExtendedResultstrue/str 
str name=spellcheck.maxCollations1/str 


str name=defTypedismax/str 
str name=qf 
   SignalImpl.baureihe^1011 text^0.1 
/str 




/lst 
arr name=last-components 
strspellcheck/str 
/arr 
/requestHandler 



-- 
View this message in context: 
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Boosting-a-field-with-defType-dismax-No
-results-at-all-tp4095850.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. 




  _  

If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion
below:

http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Boosting-a-field-with-defType-dismax-No
-results-at-all-tp4095850p4095901.html 

To unsubscribe from Boosting a field with defType:dismax -- No results at
all, click here
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubsc
ribe_by_codenode=4095850code=dXdlLmNsZW1lbnRAZXh4Y2VsbGVudC5kZXw0MDk1ODU
wfC0yOTkxOTMwMjI= .
 
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_v
iewerid=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.namlbase=nabble.naml.namespaces.Ba
sicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.temp
late.NodeNamespacebreadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-in
stant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.nam
l NAML 





--
View this message in context: 
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Boosting-a-field-with-defType-dismax-No-results-at-all-tp4095850p4095906.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: AW: Boosting a field with defType:dismax -- No results at all

2013-10-16 Thread uwe72
We have just one more Problem:

When we search explicit, like *:* or partNumber:A32783627 we still don’t get
any results.

What we are doing here wrong? 




--
View this message in context: 
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Boosting-a-field-with-defType-dismax-No-results-at-all-tp4095850p4095918.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


AW: Boosting a field with defType:dismax -- No results at all

2013-10-16 Thread uwe72
We have just one more Problem:

 

When we search explicit, like *:* or partNumber:A32783627 we still don't
get any results.

 

What we are doing here wrong? 





--
View this message in context: 
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Boosting-a-field-with-defType-dismax-No-results-at-all-tp4095850p4095927.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: AW: Boosting a field with defType:dismax -- No results at all

2013-10-16 Thread uwe72
Works like this?

str name=defTypeedismax/str
str name=qfSignalImpl.baureihe^1011 text^0.1/str

Another option:

How about just but to the desired fields a high boosting factor while adding
the field to the document, using solr?!

Can this work?




--
View this message in context: 
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Boosting-a-field-with-defType-dismax-No-results-at-all-tp4095850p4095938.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


Prevent public access to Solr Admin Page

2013-09-26 Thread uwe72
Hi there,

how can i prevent that everybody who knows the URL of our solr admin page,
has the right to access it?

Thanks in advance!
Uwe



--
View this message in context: 
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Prevent-public-access-to-Solr-Admin-Page-tp4092080.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


Re: Prevent public access to Solr Admin Page

2013-09-26 Thread uwe72
unfortunately i didn't understand at all.

We are using a tomcat for the solr server.

how exactly can i prevent that user access the solr admin page?



--
View this message in context: 
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Prevent-public-access-to-Solr-Admin-Page-tp4092080p4092236.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


AW: SOLR-4641: Schema now throws exception on illegal field parameters.

2013-06-13 Thread uwe72
Erick, i think he didn't at the validate=false to a field, but global to
the schema.xml/solrconfig.xml (i don't remember where exactly define this
globally)

 

Von: Erick Erickson [via Lucene]
[mailto:ml-node+s472066n4070067...@n3.nabble.com] 
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 13. Juni 2013 00:51
An: uwe72
Betreff: Re: SOLR-4641: Schema now throws exception on illegal field
parameters.

 

bbarani: 

Where did you see this? I haven't seen it before and I get an error on 
startup if I add validate=false to a field definition 

Thanks, 
Erick 

On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 12:33 PM, bbarani [hidden email] wrote: 


 I think if you use validate=false in schema.xml, field or dynamicField
level, 
 Solr will not disable validation. 
 
 I think this only works in solr 4.3 and above.. 
 
 
 
 -- 
 View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SOLR-4641-Schema-now-throws-exception-o
n-illegal-field-parameters-tp4069622p4069688.html
 Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. 

 

  _  

If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion
below:

http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SOLR-4641-Schema-now-throws-exception-o
n-illegal-field-parameters-tp4069622p4070067.html 

To unsubscribe from SOLR-4641: Schema now throws exception on illegal
field parameters., click here
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubsc
ribe_by_codenode=4069622code=dXdlLmNsZW1lbnRAZXh4Y2VsbGVudC5kZXw0MDY5NjI
yfC0yOTkxOTMwMjI= .
 
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_v
iewerid=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.namlbase=nabble.naml.namespaces.Ba
sicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.temp
late.NodeNamespacebreadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-in
stant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.nam
l NAML 





--
View this message in context: 
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SOLR-4641-Schema-now-throws-exception-on-illegal-field-parameters-tp4069622p4070159.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

AW: SOLR-4641: Schema now throws exception on illegal field parameters.

2013-06-13 Thread uwe72
How can i load this custom properties with solrJ?

 

Von: Erick Erickson [via Lucene]
[mailto:ml-node+s472066n4070068...@n3.nabble.com] 
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 13. Juni 2013 00:53
An: uwe72
Betreff: Re: SOLR-4641: Schema now throws exception on illegal field
parameters.

 

But see Steve Rowe's comments at 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4641 and use custom child 
properties as: 

field indexed=true multiValued=true name=f1 stored=true
type=string 
  MYPARAMVALUE/MYPARAM  !-- Maven property style -- 
  custom MYPARAM=VALUE/ !-- Alternative syntax; element name 
could be anything you want  -- 
  ... 
/field 

Best 
Erick 

On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 6:49 PM, Erick Erickson [hidden email] wrote: 


 bbarani: 
 
 Where did you see this? I haven't seen it before and I get an error on 
 startup if I add validate=false to a field definition 
 
 Thanks, 
 Erick 
 
 On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 12:33 PM, bbarani [hidden email] wrote: 
 I think if you use validate=false in schema.xml, field or dynamicField
level, 
 Solr will not disable validation. 
 
 I think this only works in solr 4.3 and above.. 
 
 
 
 -- 
 View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SOLR-4641-Schema-now-throws-exception-o
n-illegal-field-parameters-tp4069622p4069688.html
 Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. 

 

  _  

If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion
below:

http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SOLR-4641-Schema-now-throws-exception-o
n-illegal-field-parameters-tp4069622p4070068.html 

To unsubscribe from SOLR-4641: Schema now throws exception on illegal
field parameters., click here
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubsc
ribe_by_codenode=4069622code=dXdlLmNsZW1lbnRAZXh4Y2VsbGVudC5kZXw0MDY5NjI
yfC0yOTkxOTMwMjI= .
 
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_v
iewerid=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.namlbase=nabble.naml.namespaces.Ba
sicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.temp
late.NodeNamespacebreadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-in
stant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.nam
l NAML 





--
View this message in context: 
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SOLR-4641-Schema-now-throws-exception-on-illegal-field-parameters-tp4069622p4070160.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

SOLR-4641: Schema now throws exception on illegal field parameters.

2013-06-11 Thread uwe72
Is there a way to tell solr, that it should not check these parameters?

Because we added our own parameters, which we load on runtime for other
proposes.

Thans in advance!



--
View this message in context: 
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SOLR-4641-Schema-now-throws-exception-on-illegal-field-parameters-tp4069622.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


SolrJ | Atomic Updates | How works exactly?

2013-01-13 Thread uwe72
i have very big documents in the index.

i want to update a multivalue field of a document, without loading the whole
document.

how can i do this?

is there somewhere a good documentation?

regards



--
View this message in context: 
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SolrJ-Atomic-Updates-How-works-exactly-tp4032976.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


SolrJ |ContentStreamUpdateRequest | Accessing parsed items without committing to solr

2013-01-11 Thread uwe72
i have a bit strange usecase.

when i index a pdf to solr i use ContentStreamUpdateRequest.
The lucene document then contains in the text field all containing items
(the parsed items of the physical pdf).

i also need to add these parsed items to another lucene document.

is there a way, to receive/parse these items just in memory, without
comitting them to lucene?



--
View this message in context: 
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SolrJ-ContentStreamUpdateRequest-Accessing-parsed-items-without-committing-to-solr-tp4032636.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


Re: SolrJ |ContentStreamUpdateRequest | Accessing parsed items without committing to solr

2013-01-11 Thread uwe72
Yes, i don't really want to index/store the pdf document in lucene.

i just need the parsed tokens for other things.

So you mean i can use ExtractingRequestHandler.java to retrieve the items.

has anybody a piece of code, doing that?

actually i give the pdf as input and want the parsed items (the same what
would be in the text field in the stored lucene doc).





--
View this message in context: 
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SolrJ-ContentStreamUpdateRequest-Accessing-parsed-items-without-committing-to-solr-tp4032636p4032646.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


Re: SolrJ |ContentStreamUpdateRequest | Accessing parsed items without committing to solr

2013-01-11 Thread uwe72
ok, seems this works:

  Tika tika = new Tika();
  String tokens = tika.parseToString(file);  




--
View this message in context: 
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SolrJ-ContentStreamUpdateRequest-Accessing-parsed-items-without-committing-to-solr-tp4032636p4032649.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


Re: SolrJ |ContentStreamUpdateRequest | Accessing parsed items without committing to solr

2013-01-11 Thread uwe72
Erik, what do u mean with this parameter, i don't find it..



--
View this message in context: 
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SolrJ-ContentStreamUpdateRequest-Accessing-parsed-items-without-committing-to-solr-tp4032636p4032656.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


SolrJ and Solr 4.0 | doc.getFieldValue() returns String instead of Date

2013-01-08 Thread uwe72
A Lucene 4.0 document returns for a Date field now a string value, instead of
a Date object.

field name=ModuleImpl.versionAsDate view=Datenstand type=date 

Solr4.0 -- 2009-10-29T00:00:009Z
Solr3.6 -- Date instance

Can this be set somewhere in the config?

I prefer to receive a date instance



--
View this message in context: 
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SolrJ-and-Solr-4-0-doc-getFieldValue-returns-String-instead-of-Date-tp4031588.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


Re: SolrJ | IOException while Indexing a PDF document with additional fields

2013-01-03 Thread uwe72
wasn't it the stacetrace in my posting before?

It is the same behavior when i use the HttpSolrServer.java

here is the console output of the solr server:

03.01.2013 11:32:31 org.apache.solr.core.SolrDeletionPolicy updateCommits
INFO: newest commit = 1
03.01.2013 11:32:31 org.apache.solr.update.processor.LogUpdateProcessor
finish
INFO: [core-main] webapp=/solr path=/update params={wt=javabinversion=2}
{add=[WiringDiagramSheetImpl@17171]} 0 296
03.01.2013 11:32:31 org.apache.solr.update.DirectUpdateHandler2 commit
INFO: start
commit{flags=0,_version_=0,optimize=false,openSearcher=true,waitSearcher=true,expungeDeletes=false,softCommit=false}
03.01.2013 11:32:32 org.apache.solr.core.SolrDeletionPolicy onCommit
INFO: SolrDeletionPolicy.onCommit: commits:num=2
   
commit{dir=C:\Projects\Project_ConnectPORTAL\connect-portal\tools\solr\solr-home-4.0\core-main\data\index,segFN=segments_1,generation=1,filenames=[segments_1]
   
commit{dir=C:\Projects\Project_ConnectPORTAL\connect-portal\tools\solr\solr-home-4.0\core-main\data\index,segFN=segments_2,generation=2,filenames=[_0_Lucene40_0.tim,
_0.fnm, _0.tvd, _0.tvf,
_nrm.cfs, _0_Lucene40_0.prx, _0_Lucene40_0.tip, _0_Lucene40_0.frq, _0.tvx,
_0_nrm.cfe, segments_2, _0.fdx, _0.si, _0.fdt]
03.01.2013 11:32:32 org.apache.solr.core.SolrDeletionPolicy updateCommits
INFO: newest commit = 2
03.01.2013 11:32:32 org.apache.solr.search.SolrIndexSearcher init
INFO: Opening Searcher@7f2ea1dd main
03.01.2013 11:32:32 org.apache.solr.update.DirectUpdateHandler2 commit
INFO: end_commit_flush
03.01.2013 11:32:32 org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore registerSearcher
INFO: [core-main] Registered new searcher Searcher@7f2ea1dd
main{StandardDirectoryReader(segments_2:3 _0(4.0.0.2):C1)}
03.01.2013 11:32:32 org.apache.solr.update.processor.LogUpdateProcessor
finish
INFO: [core-main] webapp=/solr path=/update
params={waitSearcher=truewt=javabincommit=truesoftCommit=falseversion=2}
{commit=} 0 375




--
View this message in context: 
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SolrJ-IOException-while-Indexing-a-PDF-document-with-additional-fields-tp4029971p4030235.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


SolrJ | Add a date field to ContentStreamUpdateRequest

2012-12-30 Thread uwe72
Hi there,

how can i add a date field to a pdf document?

   ContentStreamUpdateRequest up = new
ContentStreamUpdateRequest(/update/extract);
   up.addFile(pdfFile, application/octet-stream);
   up.setParam(literal. + SolrConstants.ID, solrPDFId);

Regards
Uwe



--
View this message in context: 
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SolrJ-Add-a-date-field-to-ContentStreamUpdateRequest-tp4029704.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


Re: Bad performance while query pdf solr documents

2012-12-23 Thread uwe72
your query-time fl parameter. 

means don't return this field?

because we have many many fields, so probably now i use the default and all
fields will be loaded. so i just want to tell the query to don't load the
text field. I do this with the fl parameter? 



--
View this message in context: 
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Bad-performance-while-query-pdf-solr-documents-tp4028766p4028813.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


Re: Bad performance while query pdf solr documents

2012-12-23 Thread uwe72
we have more than hundreds fields...i don't want to put them all to the fl
parameters

is there a other way, like to say return all fields, except the fields...?

anyhow i will change the field from stored to stored=false in the schema.



--
View this message in context: 
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Bad-performance-while-query-pdf-solr-documents-tp4028766p4028816.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


Bad performance while query pdf solr documents

2012-12-22 Thread uwe72
hi

i am indexing pdf documents to solr by tika.

when i do the query in the client with solrj the performance is very bad (40
seconds) to load 100 documents?

Probably because to load all the content. The content i don't need. How can
i tell the query to don't load the content?

Or other reasons why the performance is so bad?

Regards
Uwe



--
View this message in context: 
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Bad-performance-while-query-pdf-solr-documents-tp4028766.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


Re: OutOfMemoryError | While Faceting Query

2012-12-07 Thread uwe72
You mean this:

stats:  entries_count : 24
entry#0 :
'NIOFSIndexInput(path=/home/connect/ConnectPORTAL/preview/solr-home/data/index/_2f3.frq)'='WiringDiagramSheetImpl.pageNumber',class
org.apache.lucene.search.FieldCache$StringIndex,null=org.apache.lucene.search.FieldCache$StringIndex#32159051
entry#1 :
'NIOFSIndexInput(path=/home/connect/ConnectPORTAL/preview/solr-home/data/index/_2f3.frq)'='BandagierungImpl.sachnummer',class
org.apache.lucene.search.FieldCache$StringIndex,null=org.apache.lucene.search.FieldCache$StringIndex#2383166
entry#2 :
'NIOFSIndexInput(path=/home/connect/ConnectPORTAL/preview/solr-home/data/index/_2f3.frq)'='ModuleImpl.partNumber',class
org.apache.lucene.search.FieldCache$StringIndex,null=org.apache.lucene.search.FieldCache$StringIndex#23443846
entry#3 :
'NIOFSIndexInput(path=/home/connect/ConnectPORTAL/preview/solr-home/data/index/_2f3.frq)'='SingleCoreWireImpl.wireNumber',class
org.apache.lucene.search.FieldCache$StringIndex,null=org.apache.lucene.search.FieldCache$StringIndex#24586189
entry#4 :
'NIOFSIndexInput(path=/home/connect/ConnectPORTAL/preview/solr-home/data/index/_2f3.frq)'='EinzelleitungImpl.bezeichnung',class
org.apache.lucene.search.FieldCache$StringIndex,null=org.apache.lucene.search.FieldCache$StringIndex#30808319
entry#5 :
'NIOFSIndexInput(path=/home/connect/ConnectPORTAL/preview/solr-home/data/index/_2f3.frq)'='WiringDiagramSheetImpl.partNumber',class
org.apache.lucene.search.FieldCache$StringIndex,null=org.apache.lucene.search.FieldCache$StringIndex#16987461
entry#6 :
'NIOFSIndexInput(path=/home/connect/ConnectPORTAL/preview/solr-home/data/index/_3kj.frq)'='WiringDiagramSheetImpl.pageNumber',class
org.apache.lucene.search.FieldCache$StringIndex,null=org.apache.lucene.search.FieldCache$StringIndex#27154168
entry#7 :
'NIOFSIndexInput(path=/home/connect/ConnectPORTAL/preview/solr-home/data/index/_3kj.frq)'='BandagierungImpl.sachnummer',class
org.apache.lucene.search.FieldCache$StringIndex,null=org.apache.lucene.search.FieldCache$StringIndex#6277146
entry#8 :
'NIOFSIndexInput(path=/home/connect/ConnectPORTAL/preview/solr-home/data/index/_3kj.frq)'='ModuleImpl.partNumber',class
org.apache.lucene.search.FieldCache$StringIndex,null=org.apache.lucene.search.FieldCache$StringIndex#4860238
entry#9 :
'NIOFSIndexInput(path=/home/connect/ConnectPORTAL/preview/solr-home/data/index/_3kj.frq)'='SingleCoreWireImpl.wireNumber',class
org.apache.lucene.search.FieldCache$StringIndex,null=org.apache.lucene.search.FieldCache$StringIndex#14545746
entry#10 :
'NIOFSIndexInput(path=/home/connect/ConnectPORTAL/preview/solr-home/data/index/_3kj.frq)'='EinzelleitungImpl.bezeichnung',class
org.apache.lucene.search.FieldCache$StringIndex,null=org.apache.lucene.search.FieldCache$StringIndex#26324419
entry#11 :
'NIOFSIndexInput(path=/home/connect/ConnectPORTAL/preview/solr-home/data/index/_3kj.frq)'='WiringDiagramSheetImpl.partNumber',class
org.apache.lucene.search.FieldCache$StringIndex,null=org.apache.lucene.search.FieldCache$StringIndex#19329933
entry#12 :
'NIOFSIndexInput(path=/home/connect/ConnectPORTAL/preview/solr-home/data/index/_192.frq)'='WiringDiagramSheetImpl.pageNumber',class
org.apache.lucene.search.FieldCache$StringIndex,null=org.apache.lucene.search.FieldCache$StringIndex#4187113
entry#13 :
'NIOFSIndexInput(path=/home/connect/ConnectPORTAL/preview/solr-home/data/index/_192.frq)'='BandagierungImpl.sachnummer',class
org.apache.lucene.search.FieldCache$StringIndex,null=org.apache.lucene.search.FieldCache$StringIndex#9180601
entry#14 :
'NIOFSIndexInput(path=/home/connect/ConnectPORTAL/preview/solr-home/data/index/_192.frq)'='ModuleImpl.partNumber',class
org.apache.lucene.search.FieldCache$StringIndex,null=org.apache.lucene.search.FieldCache$StringIndex#15091934
entry#15 :
'NIOFSIndexInput(path=/home/connect/ConnectPORTAL/preview/solr-home/data/index/_192.frq)'='SingleCoreWireImpl.wireNumber',class
org.apache.lucene.search.FieldCache$StringIndex,null=org.apache.lucene.search.FieldCache$StringIndex#12186256
entry#16 :
'NIOFSIndexInput(path=/home/connect/ConnectPORTAL/preview/solr-home/data/index/_192.frq)'='EinzelleitungImpl.bezeichnung',class
org.apache.lucene.search.FieldCache$StringIndex,null=org.apache.lucene.search.FieldCache$StringIndex#31719847
entry#17 :
'NIOFSIndexInput(path=/home/connect/ConnectPORTAL/preview/solr-home/data/index/_192.frq)'='WiringDiagramSheetImpl.partNumber',class
org.apache.lucene.search.FieldCache$StringIndex,null=org.apache.lucene.search.FieldCache$StringIndex#2653949
entry#18 :
'NIOFSIndexInput(path=/home/connect/ConnectPORTAL/preview/solr-home/data/index/_2f3.frq)'='WiringDiagramSheetImpl.versionAsDate',long,org.apache.lucene.search.FieldCache.NUMERIC_UTILS_LONG_PARSER=[J#11082048
entry#19 :
'NIOFSIndexInput(path=/home/connect/ConnectPORTAL/preview/solr-home/data/index/_2f3.frq)'='ModuleImpl.versionAsDate',long,org.apache.lucene.search.FieldCache.NUMERIC_UTILS_LONG_PARSER=[J#28896878
entry#20 :

Pls help: Very long query - what to do?

2012-11-21 Thread uwe72
my query is like this, see below. I use already POST request.

i got a solr exception:
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.SolrServerException: Server at
http://server:7056/solr returned non ok status:400, message:Bad Request

is there a way in order to prevent this?

id:(ModuleImpl@20117 OR ModuleImpl@37886 OR ModuleImpl@9379 OR
ModuleImpl@37906 OR ModuleImpl@19969 OR ModuleImpl@37936 OR
ModuleImpl@115568 OR ModuleImpl@19901 OR ModuleImpl@115472 OR
ModuleImpl@20044 OR ModuleImpl@25168 OR ModuleImpl@38026 OR
ModuleImpl@115647 OR ModuleImpl@115648 OR ModuleImpl@115649 OR
ModuleImpl@20045 OR ModuleImpl@25169 OR ModuleImpl@38031 OR
ModuleImpl@115650 OR ModuleImpl@21090 OR ModuleImpl@38037 OR
ModuleImpl@117097 OR ModuleImpl@21091 OR ModuleImpl@38038 OR
ModuleImpl@117098 OR ModuleImpl@117099 OR ModuleImpl@19973 OR
ModuleImpl@38040 OR ModuleImpl@115571 OR ModuleImpl@115572 OR
ModuleImpl@115573 OR ModuleImpl@21092 OR ModuleImpl@38135 OR
ModuleImpl@117100 OR ModuleImpl@21093 OR ModuleImpl@38136 OR
ModuleImpl@117101 OR ModuleImpl@117102 OR ModuleImpl@19979 OR
ModuleImpl@38140 OR ModuleImpl@115581 OR ModuleImpl@19980 OR
ModuleImpl@38143 OR ModuleImpl@115582 OR ModuleImpl@115583 OR
ModuleImpl@21094 OR ModuleImpl@38223 OR ModuleImpl@117104 OR
ModuleImpl@117105 OR ModuleImpl@117106 OR ModuleImpl@117107 OR
ModuleImpl@117108 OR ModuleImpl@21095 OR ModuleImpl@38224 OR
ModuleImpl@117109 OR ModuleImpl@19920 OR ModuleImpl@25157 OR
ModuleImpl@38240 OR ModuleImpl@115493 OR ModuleImpl@20139 OR
ModuleImpl@38286 OR ModuleImpl@115752 OR ModuleImpl@21096 OR
ModuleImpl@38327 OR ModuleImpl@117111 OR ModuleImpl@117112 OR
ModuleImpl@117113 OR ModuleImpl@21097 OR ModuleImpl@38328 OR
ModuleImpl@117114 OR ModuleImpl@19989 OR ModuleImpl@25166 OR
ModuleImpl@38332 OR ModuleImpl@115585 OR ModuleImpl@115586 OR
ModuleImpl@19990 OR ModuleImpl@38339 OR ModuleImpl@115587 OR
ModuleImpl@115588 OR ModuleImpl@115589 OR ModuleImpl@115590 OR
ModuleImpl@115591 OR ModuleImpl@115592 OR ModuleImpl@115593 OR
ModuleImpl@115594 OR ModuleImpl@115595 OR ModuleImpl@19807 OR
ModuleImpl@38365 OR ModuleImpl@115365 OR ModuleImpl@115366 OR
ModuleImpl@19808 OR ModuleImpl@38373 OR ModuleImpl@115367 OR
ModuleImpl@115368 OR ModuleImpl@115369 OR ModuleImpl@115370 OR
ModuleImpl@115371 OR ModuleImpl@21121 OR ModuleImpl@38418 OR
ModuleImpl@117132 OR ModuleImpl@117133 OR ModuleImpl@117134 OR
ModuleImpl@732 OR ModuleImpl@38438 OR ModuleImpl@117115 OR
ModuleImpl@21099 OR ModuleImpl@38440 OR ModuleImpl@117116 OR
ModuleImpl@19929 OR ModuleImpl@38450 OR ModuleImpl@115501 OR
ModuleImpl@115502 OR ModuleImpl@19810 OR ModuleImpl@38471 OR
ModuleImpl@115372 OR ModuleImpl@115373 OR ModuleImpl@21124 OR
ModuleImpl@38529 OR ModuleImpl@117135 OR ModuleImpl@117136 OR
ModuleImpl@117137 OR ModuleImpl@117138 OR ModuleImpl@19931 OR
ModuleImpl@115505 OR ModuleImpl@21074 OR ModuleImpl@38546 OR
ModuleImpl@117077 OR ModuleImpl@19934 OR ModuleImpl@38548 OR
ModuleImpl@115507 OR ModuleImpl@115508 OR ModuleImpl@115509 OR
ModuleImpl@115510 OR ModuleImpl@20550 OR ModuleImpl@38607 OR
ModuleImpl@115885 OR ModuleImpl@21127 OR ModuleImpl@38638 OR
ModuleImpl@117139 OR ModuleImpl@21077 OR ModuleImpl@25182 OR
ModuleImpl@38657 OR ModuleImpl@117078 OR ModuleImpl@117079 OR
ModuleImpl@117080 OR ModuleImpl@19938 OR ModuleImpl@38658 OR
ModuleImpl@115516 OR ModuleImpl@115517 OR ModuleImpl@115518 OR
ModuleImpl@115519 OR ModuleImpl@19864 OR ModuleImpl@115432 OR
ModuleImpl@19769 OR ModuleImpl@38695 OR ModuleImpl@115320 OR
ModuleImpl@20556 OR ModuleImpl@38720 OR ModuleImpl@20494 OR
ModuleImpl@38736 OR ModuleImpl@19871 OR ModuleImpl@115438 OR
ModuleImpl@21056 OR ModuleImpl@38771 OR ModuleImpl@19775 OR
ModuleImpl@19776 OR ModuleImpl@38802 OR ModuleImpl@115330 OR
ModuleImpl@115331 OR ModuleImpl@115332 OR ModuleImpl@20566 OR
ModuleImpl@38835 OR ModuleImpl@115889 OR ModuleImpl@115890 OR
ModuleImpl@20501 OR ModuleImpl@38846 OR ModuleImpl@115869 OR
ModuleImpl@115870 OR ModuleImpl@21107 OR ModuleImpl@38859 OR
ModuleImpl@117118 OR ModuleImpl@19879 OR ModuleImpl@38871 OR
ModuleImpl@115444 OR ModuleImpl@115445 OR ModuleImpl@21058 OR
ModuleImpl@38873 OR ModuleImpl@19823 OR ModuleImpl@25153 OR
ModuleImpl@38896 OR ModuleImpl@115396 OR ModuleImpl@115397 OR
ModuleImpl@19779 OR ModuleImpl@38904 OR ModuleImpl@115334 OR
ModuleImpl@115335 OR ModuleImpl@115336 OR ModuleImpl@20574 OR
ModuleImpl@38932 OR ModuleImpl@115892 OR ModuleImpl@115893 OR
ModuleImpl@20504 OR ModuleImpl@38941 OR ModuleImpl@115871 OR
ModuleImpl@115872 OR ModuleImpl@21083 OR ModuleImpl@38962 OR
ModuleImpl@117081 OR ModuleImpl@117082 OR ModuleImpl@19884 OR
ModuleImpl@38969 OR ModuleImpl@115449 OR ModuleImpl@115450 OR
ModuleImpl@19825 OR ModuleImpl@38988 OR ModuleImpl@115400 OR
ModuleImpl@115401 OR ModuleImpl@115402 OR ModuleImpl@25154 OR
ModuleImpl@38990 OR ModuleImpl@115403 OR ModuleImpl@115404 OR
ModuleImpl@19781 OR ModuleImpl@38994 OR ModuleImpl@115337 OR
ModuleImpl@20506 OR ModuleImpl@39032 OR ModuleImpl@115874 OR
ModuleImpl@20453 OR ModuleImpl@39051 OR ModuleImpl@115856 OR

Re: Pls help: Very long query - what to do?

2012-11-21 Thread uwe72
i have already:

Connector port=7055 protocol=HTTP/1.1
   connectionTimeout=2 URIEncoding=UTF-8
maxHttpHeaderSize=
   redirectPort=8453 /





--
View this message in context: 
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Pls-help-Very-long-query-what-to-do-tp4021606p4021619.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


Re: Pls help: Very long query - what to do?

2012-11-21 Thread uwe72
Yes it works when i increase the maxBooleanClauses

But any case i have to think how i redesign the document structure.

i have big problems do the relations between documents.

also a document can be changed, then i have to update many documents which
has a relation to the modified one.



--
View this message in context: 
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Pls-help-Very-long-query-what-to-do-tp4021606p4021673.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


Re: Pls help: Very long query - what to do?

2012-11-21 Thread uwe72
My design is like this at the moment:

Documents in general has a relation to each other.

So, a document has a id, some attributes and a multivalue-field
navigateTo.

E.g.

Document1: id1, some attributes,  naviagteToAllDocumentsWhenColor:red,
navigateTo: id2, id3

Document2: id2, some attributes, color:red, navigateTo:  id1 (backlink)
Document3: id3, some attributes, color:red, navigateTo:  id1 (backlink)
Document4: id5, some attributes, color:black, navigateTo:  

My first problem is, that when I re-import document3 I have to load all
documents in cache which has a relation to my documents, because of my color
is red. Especially when my color is not red anymore, I have to update
document1 und delete the relation to document3.

Always do the queries in order to find out which documents I have to update,
the to load and update it, costs a lot of performance.

That’s why I changed the design. I don’t do all relations anymore at
importime. I have some serialized hashmaps and store and update them outide
of solr.

In this maps I have the informations which documents I related to a
document. I have all ids. But then I have this problem now, that this can be
up to 20.000 ids. So I think this is impossible to load the with
OR...OR...OR.

It is a bit complicated to explain...i am using solr 3.6.1. I think with
solr 4 they have this LINK feature, where can join other queries. Not sure
if this would fix my problem.

REGARDS, Uwe




--
View this message in context: 
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Pls-help-Very-long-query-what-to-do-tp4021606p4021684.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


Inserting many documents and update relations

2012-11-19 Thread uwe72
Hi there,

i have a principal question.

We have arround 5 million lucene documents. 

At the beginning we have arround 4000 XML-files which we transform to
SolrInputDocuemnts by using solrj and adding them to the index.

A document is also related to other documents, so while adding a document we
have to do some queries (at least one) to identiy if there are related
documents already in the cache in order to do the association to the related
document. The related document also has a backlink, so we have to update
also the related document (means load, update, delete and re-add).

We are using solr 3.6.1.

The performance is quite slow because of this queries and modfifications of
already existing documents in the cache.

Are there some configuration issues what we can do, or anything else?

Thanks a lot in advance.





--
View this message in context: 
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Inserting-many-documents-and-update-relations-tp4021151.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


Re: java.io.IOException: Map failed :: OutOfMemory

2012-11-13 Thread uwe72
Thanks Eric. We are using:

export JAVA_OPTS=-XX:MaxPermSize=400m -Xmx2000m -Xms200M
-Dsolr.solr.home=/home/connect/ConnectPORTAL/preview/solr-home

We have arround 5 Millions documents. The index size is arround 50GB.

Before we add a document we delete the same id in the cache, doesn't matter
if the doc exists or not.

We use here the functionality in solrj to delete a list of ids.

Always in this deletion the error occurs.






--
View this message in context: 
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/java-io-IOException-Map-failed-OutOfMemory-tp4019802p4020027.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


Re: java.io.IOException: Map failed :: OutOfMemory

2012-11-13 Thread uwe72
Kernel: 2.6.32.29-0.3-default #1 SMP 2011-02-25 13:36:59 +0100 x86_64
x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 11 SP1  (x86_64)

physical Memory: 4 GB

portadm@smtcax0033:/srv/connect/tomcat/instances/SYSTEST_Portal_01/bin
java -version
java version 1.6.0_33
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_33-b03) Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit
Server VM (build 20.8-b03, mixed mode)




--
View this message in context: 
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/java-io-IOException-Map-failed-OutOfMemory-tp4019802p4020078.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


Re: java.io.IOException: Map failed :: OutOfMemory

2012-11-13 Thread uwe72
today the same exception:

INFO: [] webapp=/solr path=/update
params={waitSearcher=truecommit=truewt=javabinwaitFlush=trueversion=2}
status=0 QTime=1009 
Nov 13, 2012 2:02:27 PM org.apache.solr.core.SolrDeletionPolicy onInit
INFO: SolrDeletionPolicy.onInit: commits:num=1

commit{dir=/net/smtcax0033/connect/Portal/solr-home/data/index,segFN=segments_3gm,version=1352803609067,generation=4486,filenames=[_21c.fdt,
_4mv.tis, _4mh.fnm, _1si.fdt, _4n0.fdx, _4mx.nrm, _1si.fdx, _2n0.nrm,
_2n0.prx, _4mv.tii, _3ii.fnm, _4mz.tvd, _4mv.nrm, _2ie.frq, _1l9.fnm,
_4my.fnm, _21c.fdx, _308.tvd, _4mz.tvf, _308.tvf, _sc.tis, _4mw.tii,
_4n1.fnm, _4mv.fdt, _1o2.nrm, _1si.nrm, _4mw.fdt, _it.tvf, _4mv.fdx,
_sc.tii, _4mw.tis, _4mw.fdx, _37y.tvx, _4mz.tvx, _4mh.nrm, _1si.prx,
_1o2.prx, _it.tvx, _3ii.tis, _3yn.nrm, _43w.tii, _37y.tvd, _3yn.prx,
_308.prx, _cv.nrm, _37y.tvf, _1b9.nrm, _3xp.frq, _43w.tis, _4mf.tvf,
_4mf.tvd, _1b9.fdt, _4ag.fdt, _1b9.fdx, _4mz.frq, _4ag.fdx, _418.tvx,
_4mf.tvx, _418.frq, _473.tis, _3ii.nrm, _4mx.fnm, _cv.frq, _3yn.tvd,
_418.tvd, _3yn.tvf, _418.tvf, _2ie.tvf, _2ie.tvd, _sc.frq, _1b9.frq,
_4ag.nrm, _37y.tii, _cv.prx, _4mx.tis, _4ag.prx, _2ie.tvx, _2n0.fdx,
_4mx.tii, _4mh.prx, _4my.prx, _4mz.nrm, _4lc.prx, _2ie.nrm, _3yn.tis,
_4n0.tii, _4mw.prx, _3yn.tvx, _it.fnm, _2n0.fdt, _4ag.frq, _21c.tvf,
_21c.tvd, _21c.nrm, _43w.prx, _308.fdt, _4my.frq, _1si.tvx, _4n3.prx,
_3yn.tii, _37y.tis, _4dj.fdt, _473.frq, _1l9.prx, _2ie.fnm, _4dj.fdx,
_308.fdx, _473.tvx, _cv.fdx, _4mz.tii, _473.tii, _cv.fdt, _3xp.tii,
_4lc.nrm, _2em.fnm, _it.tis, _418.fdx, _4n3.fdx, _3xp.tis, _418.fdt,
_1ih.fdx, _it.tii, _4n3.fdt, _4ix.tis, _1ih.fdt, _4lc.fdt, _4ix.tii,
_4mz.tis, _1b9.prx, _4n0.tis, _4lc.fdx, _473.tvd, _1ih.nrm, _2n0.frq,
_473.tvf, _4mz.fdx, _sc.fdx, _it.nrm, _4mz.fdt, _4my.tvx, _4mx.tvf,
_3ii.tii, _1b9.tvf, _4mx.tvd, _1b9.tvd, _418.prx, _3ii.tvx, _3xp.fnm,
_4mv.tvx, _sc.fdt, _sc.prx, segments_3gm, _418.fnm, _2n0.tii, _4mf.tis,
_sc.nrm, _4mf.tii, _4dj.nrm, _3ii.tvd, _1ih.frq, _3ii.tvf, _4n1.prx,
_1o2.tii, _37y.frq, _2em.prx, _4n3.frq, _4ix.fdt, _473.fdt, _21c.prx,
_1o2.tvx, _3xp.nrm, _473.fdx, _sc.fnm, _2n0.tis, _43w.fdt, _4mf.fnm,
_4ix.fdx, _43w.fdx, _4dj.tis, _473.nrm, _4my.tvf, _4mx.tvx, _4mv.tvd,
_1o2.tvd, _4my.tvd, _1o2.tvf, _4dj.tii, _4mv.frq, _1si.tvf, _4mv.tvf,
_1si.tvd, _473.fnm, _4ix.frq, _cv.tvx, _4dj.tvd, _21c.tii, _473.prx,
_4n1.tvx, _1ih.tvx, _1si.tis, _cv.tvf, _4ag.fnm, _1b9.tvx, _1ih.tvf,
_1l9.fdx, _4lc.tii, _1ih.tvd, _4n1.fdx, _4lc.tis, _1l9.fdt, _21c.tis,
_4dj.tvf, _1si.tii, _4n1.fdt, _4n0.fnm, _cv.tvd, _it.frq, _4mv.prx,
_4mh.tis, _3xp.tvf, _4n0.tvf, _3xp.tvd, _4n0.tvd, _4mx.fdx, _4my.nrm,
_4dj.frq, _4mx.fdt, _43w.frq, _1o2.frq, _4n0.tvx, _it.tvd, _1si.fnm,
_4n3.tvx, _3xp.tvx, _4mz.prx, _4my.tis, _21c.tvx, _37y.prx, _1ih.tii,
_4ix.prx, _4mh.fdt, _2n0.fnm, _4n3.tvf, _21c.fnm, _4mh.fdx, _2em.tvx,
_1b9.tii, _308.frq, _4mx.prx, _37y.fdx, _3yn.fnm, _4n3.tvd, _4mh.tii,
_4ag.tis, _4my.tii, _1b9.tis, _2ie.prx, _1ih.prx, _4ag.tii, _4n1.tvd,
_1ih.fnm, _3ii.prx, _4ix.nrm, _4n1.tvf, _4n1.nrm, _2em.tvd, _4mv.fnm,
_4mw.fnm, _37y.nrm, _it.fdx, _4mf.frq, _4n0.nrm, _3ii.frq, _it.fdt,
_1o2.tis, _37y.fdt, _4dj.tvx, _4n3.fnm, _4lc.fnm, _4my.fdt, _4lc.frq,
_2em.tvf, _4my.fdx, _37y.fnm, _4n0.prx, _1l9.tvd, _418.nrm, _2em.tis,
_4mw.nrm, _3xp.prx, _2ie.tis, _3xp.fdx, _1l9.frq, _1l9.tvf, _4mf.nrm,
_2em.tii, _4ix.fnm, _3xp.fdt, _4mh.tvd, _4mh.tvf, _2ie.tii, _1o2.fdt,
_4mh.tvx, _4mf.fdt, _4n0.frq, _308.tii, _4mw.tvx, _4ag.tvx, _308.tis,
_4n1.frq, _4mf.fdx, _sc.tvd, _sc.tvf, _3yn.fdt, _4mw.tvf, _4ag.tvf,
_4mw.tvd, _3yn.fdx, _1o2.fdx, _43w.fnm, _1o2.fnm, _4ag.tvd, _1si.frq,
_sc.tvx, _cv.tis, _4dj.fnm, _4mh.frq, _1ih.tis, _4lc.tvf, _2em.fdt,
_4lc.tvd, _2em.frq, _4ix.tvd, _21c.frq, _3ii.fdt, _2em.fdx, _4ix.tvf,
_4n1.tis, _cv.tii, _4mz.fnm, _308.tvx, _4dj.prx, _4lc.tvx, _43w.tvf,
_308.fnm, _3yn.frq, _43w.tvd, _43w.nrm, _it.prx, _4mx.frq, _cv.fnm,
_2n0.tvx, _1l9.tii, _4n0.fdt, _418.tis, _418.tii, _1l9.tis, _4n3.nrm,
_1l9.nrm, _4mw.frq, _4mf.prx, _4ix.tvx, _1l9.tvx, _2ie.fdx, _1b9.fnm,
_43w.tvx, _2n0.tvd, _4n3.tii, _2n0.tvf, _3ii.fdx, _4n1.tii, _2em.nrm,
_4n3.tis, _308.nrm, _2ie.fdt]
Nov 13, 2012 2:02:27 PM org.apache.solr.core.SolrDeletionPolicy
updateCommits
INFO: newest commit = 1352803609067
Nov 13, 2012 2:02:27 PM org.apache.solr.update.processor.LogUpdateProcessor
finish
INFO: {add=[SingleCoreWireImpl@3005994, SingleCoreWireImpl@3005997,
SingleCoreWireImpl@3005996, SingleCoreWireImpl@3005999,
SingleCoreWireImpl@3005998, SingleCoreWireImpl@3005985,
SingleCoreWireImpl@3005984, SingleCoreWireImpl@3005987, ... (500 adds)]} 0
85
Nov 13, 2012 2:02:27 PM org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore execute
INFO: [] webapp=/solr path=/update params={wt=javabinversion=2} status=0
QTime=85 
Nov 13, 2012 2:02:27 PM org.apache.solr.update.DirectUpdateHandler2 commit
INFO: start
commit(optimize=false,waitFlush=true,waitSearcher=true,expungeDeletes=false)
Exception in thread Lucene Merge Thread #0
org.apache.lucene.index.MergePolicy$MergeException: 

Re: AW: java.io.IOException: Map failed :: OutOfMemory

2012-11-13 Thread uwe72
Thanks Andrew!

Parallel i also found this thread:
http://grokbase.com/t/lucene/solr-user/117m8e9n8t/solr-3-3-exception-in-thread-lucene-merge-thread-1

they are talking about the same

We just started the importer again, with the unlimited-flag (/ulimit -v
unlimited /), then we will see.






--
View this message in context: 
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/java-io-IOException-Map-failed-OutOfMemory-tp4019802p4020134.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


java.io.IOException: Map failed :: OutOfMemory

2012-11-12 Thread uwe72
While adding lucene document we got this problem: What can we do here?


Nov 12, 2012 3:25:09 PM org.apache.solr.update.DirectUpdateHandler2 commit
INFO: start
commit(optimize=false,waitFlush=true,waitSearcher=true,expungeDeletes=false)
Exception in thread Lucene Merge Thread #0
org.apache.lucene.index.MergePolicy$MergeException: java.io.IOException: Map
failed
at
org.apache.lucene.index.ConcurrentMergeScheduler.handleMergeException(ConcurrentMergeScheduler.java:509)
at
org.apache.lucene.index.ConcurrentMergeScheduler$MergeThread.run(ConcurrentMergeScheduler.java:482)
Caused by: java.io.IOException: Map failed
at sun.nio.ch.FileChannelImpl.map(FileChannelImpl.java:748)
at
org.apache.lucene.store.MMapDirectory$MMapIndexInput.init(MMapDirectory.java:270)
at
org.apache.lucene.store.MMapDirectory.openInput(MMapDirectory.java:220)
at
org.apache.lucene.index.TermVectorsReader.init(TermVectorsReader.java:87)
at
org.apache.lucene.index.SegmentCoreReaders.openDocStores(SegmentCoreReaders.java:243)
at org.apache.lucene.index.SegmentReader.get(SegmentReader.java:118)
at
org.apache.lucene.index.IndexWriter$ReaderPool.get(IndexWriter.java:696)
at
org.apache.lucene.index.IndexWriter.mergeMiddle(IndexWriter.java:4238)
at org.apache.lucene.index.IndexWriter.merge(IndexWriter.java:3908)
at
org.apache.lucene.index.ConcurrentMergeScheduler.doMerge(ConcurrentMergeScheduler.java:388)
at
org.apache.lucene.index.ConcurrentMergeScheduler$MergeThread.run(ConcurrentMergeScheduler.java:456)
Caused by: java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Map failed
at sun.nio.ch.FileChannelImpl.map0(Native Method)
at sun.nio.ch.FileChannelImpl.map(FileChannelImpl.java:745)
... 10 more
Nov 12, 2012 3:25:11 PM org.apache.solr.core.SolrDeletionPolicy onCommit
INFO: SolrDeletionPolicy.onCommit: commits:num=2




Nov 12, 2012 5:16:41 PM org.apache.solr.update.SolrIndexWriter finalize
SEVERE: SolrIndexWriter was not closed prior to finalize(), indicates a bug
-- POSSIBLE RESOURCE LEAK!!!
Nov 12, 2012 5:16:41 PM org.apache.solr.update.SolrIndexWriter finalize
SEVERE: SolrIndexWriter was not closed prior to finalize(), indicates a bug
-- POSSIBLE RESOURCE LEAK!!!



--
View this message in context: 
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/java-io-IOException-Map-failed-OutOfMemory-tp4019802.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.