Re: [Solr 4.2] deleteInstanceDir is added to CoreAdminHandler but is not supported in Unload CoreAdminRequest
According to code, at least in Solr 4.2, getParams of CoreAdminRequest.Unload returns locally created ModifiableSolrParams. It means that parameters that are set in such way won't be received in CoreAdminHandler. I'm going to open an issue in Jira and provide a patch for this. Best regards, Lyuba On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 6:12 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar shalinman...@gmail.com wrote: SolrJ doesn't have explicit support for that param but you can always add it yourself. For example: CoreAdminRequest.Unload req = new CoreAdminRequest.Unload(false); ((ModifiableSolrParams) req.getParams()).set(deleteInstanceDir, true); req.process(server); On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 12:50 PM, Lyuba Romanchuk lyuba.romanc...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I need to unload core with deleting instance directory of the core. According to code of Solr4.2 I don't see the support for this parameter in solrj. Is there the fix or open issue for this? Best regards, Lyuba -- Regards, Shalin Shekhar Mangar.
Re: [Solr 4.2] deleteInstanceDir is added to CoreAdminHandler but is not supported in Unload CoreAdminRequest
SolrJ doesn't have explicit support for that param but you can always add it yourself. For example: CoreAdminRequest.Unload req = new CoreAdminRequest.Unload(false); ((ModifiableSolrParams) req.getParams()).set(deleteInstanceDir, true); req.process(server); On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 12:50 PM, Lyuba Romanchuk lyuba.romanc...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I need to unload core with deleting instance directory of the core. According to code of Solr4.2 I don't see the support for this parameter in solrj. Is there the fix or open issue for this? Best regards, Lyuba -- Regards, Shalin Shekhar Mangar.
[Solr 4.2] deleteInstanceDir is added to CoreAdminHandler but is not supported in Unload CoreAdminRequest
Hi, I need to unload core with deleting instance directory of the core. According to code of Solr4.2 I don't see the support for this parameter in solrj. Is there the fix or open issue for this? Best regards, Lyuba