Re: DELETEREPLICA command shouldn't delete de last replica of a shard
I raised a JIRA with this, SOLR-8257 - Best regards -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/DELETEREPLICA-command-shouldn-t-delete-de-last-replica-of-a-shard-tp4239054p4239139.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
DELETEREPLICA command shouldn't delete de last replica of a shard
I don't know if this behaviour makes sense but in my IMHO the last replica of a shard should be removed only by the DELETESHARD command ... If you don't not notice about this behaviour, the result is the deletion of the whole shard, and as a consequence, the deletion of the shard in the clusterstate.json ... with all the pain associated. - Best regards -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/DELETEREPLICA-command-shouldn-t-delete-de-last-replica-of-a-shard-tp4239054.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: DELETEREPLICA command shouldn't delete de last replica of a shard
On Sun, Nov 8, 2015 at 11:20 PM, Erick Ericksonwrote: > I see your point. In the custom routing case where it _is_ reasonable > to delete all replicas in a shard, DELETESHARD does the trick. > > It's reasonable to raise a JIRA I think so we have a record of the > discussion/decision. > There is a related, but maybe not exactly same, JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5209 > > Erick > > On Sun, Nov 8, 2015 at 9:13 AM, Yago Riveiro > wrote: > > I don't know if this behaviour makes sense but in my IMHO the last > replica of > > a shard should be removed only by the DELETESHARD command ... > > > > If you don't not notice about this behaviour, the result is the deletion > of > > the whole shard, and as a consequence, the deletion of the shard in the > > clusterstate.json ... with all the pain associated. > > > > > > > > - > > Best regards > > -- > > View this message in context: > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/DELETEREPLICA-command-shouldn-t-delete-de-last-replica-of-a-shard-tp4239054.html > > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >
Re: DELETEREPLICA command shouldn't delete de last replica of a shard
I see your point. In the custom routing case where it _is_ reasonable to delete all replicas in a shard, DELETESHARD does the trick. It's reasonable to raise a JIRA I think so we have a record of the discussion/decision. Erick On Sun, Nov 8, 2015 at 9:13 AM, Yago Riveirowrote: > I don't know if this behaviour makes sense but in my IMHO the last replica of > a shard should be removed only by the DELETESHARD command ... > > If you don't not notice about this behaviour, the result is the deletion of > the whole shard, and as a consequence, the deletion of the shard in the > clusterstate.json ... with all the pain associated. > > > > - > Best regards > -- > View this message in context: > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/DELETEREPLICA-command-shouldn-t-delete-de-last-replica-of-a-shard-tp4239054.html > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.