Re: Duplicate items in distributed search
On Jul 4, 2010, at 5:10 PM, Andrew Clegg wrote: Mark Miller-3 wrote: On 7/4/10 12:49 PM, Andrew Clegg wrote: I thought so but thanks for clarifying. Maybe a wording change on the wiki Sounds like a good idea - go ahead and make the change if you'd like. That page seems to be marked immutable... You have to create an account and log in in order to edit wiki pages. Erik
Duplicate items in distributed search
Hi, I'm after a bit of clarification about the 'limitations' section of the distributed search page on the wiki. The first two limitations say: * Documents must have a unique key and the unique key must be stored (stored=true in schema.xml) * When duplicate doc IDs are received, Solr chooses the first doc and discards subsequent ones Does 'doc ID' in the second point refer to the unique key in the first point, or does it refer to the internal Lucene document ID? Cheers, Andrew. -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Duplicate-items-in-distributed-search-tp942408p942408.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Duplicate items in distributed search
On 7/4/10 11:41 AM, Andrew Clegg wrote: Hi, I'm after a bit of clarification about the 'limitations' section of the distributed search page on the wiki. The first two limitations say: * Documents must have a unique key and the unique key must be stored (stored=true in schema.xml) * When duplicate doc IDs are received, Solr chooses the first doc and discards subsequent ones Does 'doc ID' in the second point refer to the unique key in the first point, or does it refer to the internal Lucene document ID? Cheers, Andrew. The 'doc ID' in the second point refers to the unique key in the first point. -- - Mark http://www.lucidimagination.com
Re: Duplicate items in distributed search
On 7/4/10 12:49 PM, Andrew Clegg wrote: Mark Miller-3 wrote: The 'doc ID' in the second point refers to the unique key in the first point. I thought so but thanks for clarifying. Maybe a wording change on the wiki would be good? Cheers, Andrew. Sounds like a good idea - go ahead and make the change if you'd like. -- - Mark http://www.lucidimagination.com
Re: Duplicate items in distributed search
Mark Miller-3 wrote: On 7/4/10 12:49 PM, Andrew Clegg wrote: I thought so but thanks for clarifying. Maybe a wording change on the wiki Sounds like a good idea - go ahead and make the change if you'd like. That page seems to be marked immutable... -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Duplicate-items-in-distributed-search-tp942408p942984.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
