Cross field highlighting
Hi, I would like to store the document content into a single special field (non indexed, stored only), and create several indexed copy fields (different analysis applied). During highlighting, the analysis definitions of the stored field are used, so that improper or no highlighting is done. Is there any workaround for this? Duplicating the stored field is not a good idea, considering the overwhelming storage overhead. Thanks, Alexey -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Cross-field-highlighting-tp4031103.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Field highlighting
Jan Høydahl / Cominvent wrote: Did you solve this? If yes, what was wrong? If no, can you specify one concrete example document and a matching query which fails to highlight? -- Jan Høydahl - search architect Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com On 7. jan. 2010, at 15.23, Xavier Schepler wrote: Erick Erickson a écrit : It's really hard to provide any response with so little information, could you show us the difference between a field that works and one that doesn't? Especially the relevant schema.xml entries and the query that fails to highlight Erick On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 7:47 AM, Xavier Schepler < xavier.schep...@sciences-po.fr> wrote: Hi, I'm trying to highlight short text values. The field they came from has a type shared with other fields. I have highlighting working on other fields but not on this one. Why ? Thanks for your response. Here are some extracts from my schema.xml : Here's a field on which highlighting works : Here's the field on which it doesn't : They are kinda the same. But modalitiesLabelFr contains mostly short strings like : Côtes-d Armor Creuse Dordogne Doubs Drôme Eure Eure-et-Loir Finistère When matches are found in them, I get a list like this, with no text : The name attribute is the uid of the document. I tryed several values for hl.fragsize (0, 1, 2, ...) with no success at all. If you are using trunk version, because those fields' termVectors/termPositions/termOffsets are all on, DefaultSolrHighlighter uses FastVectorHighlighter unless you set hl.useHighlighter to true explicitly. And FVH doesn't support dismax at the moment. It has been fixed in Lucene trunk: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2243 If you want to use the fix, download Lucene trunk, execute ant build-contrib, cp lucene-fast-vector-highlighter-3.1-dev.jar to solr/lib and delete old FVH jar in solr/lib. Koji -- http://www.rondhuit.com/en/
Re: Field highlighting
Did you solve this? If yes, what was wrong? If no, can you specify one concrete example document and a matching query which fails to highlight? -- Jan Høydahl - search architect Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com On 7. jan. 2010, at 15.23, Xavier Schepler wrote: > Erick Erickson a écrit : >> It's really hard to provide any response with so little information, >> could you show us the difference between a field that works >> and one that doesn't? Especially the relevant schema.xml entries >> and the query that fails to highlight >> >> Erick >> >> On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 7:47 AM, Xavier Schepler < >> xavier.schep...@sciences-po.fr> wrote: >> >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I'm trying to highlight short text values. The field they came from has a >>> type shared with other fields. I have highlighting working on other fields >>> but not on this one. >>> Why ? >>> >>> >> >> > Thanks for your response. > Here are some extracts from my schema.xml : > > > > >ignoreCase="true"/> > > > > > > > > > > > >ignoreCase="true" expand="true"/> > > > > Here's a field on which highlighting works : > >required="false" > type="textFr" > multiValued="true" > indexed="true" > stored="true" > compressed="false" > omitNorms="false" > termVectors="true" > termPositions="true" > termOffsets="true" > /> > > Here's the field on which it doesn't : > > required="false" > type="textFr" > multiValued="true" > indexed="true" > stored="true" > compressed="false" > omitNorms="false" > termVectors="true" > termPositions="true" > termOffsets="true" > /> > > They are kinda the same. > > But modalitiesLabelFr contains mostly short strings like : > > Côtes-d Armor > Creuse > Dordogne > Doubs > Drôme > Eure > Eure-et-Loir > Finistère > > When matches are found in them, I get a list like this, with no text : > > > > > > > > The name attribute is the uid of the document. > > I tryed several values for hl.fragsize (0, 1, 2, ...) with no success at all.
Re: Field highlighting
Erick Erickson a écrit : It's really hard to provide any response with so little information, could you show us the difference between a field that works and one that doesn't? Especially the relevant schema.xml entries and the query that fails to highlight Erick On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 7:47 AM, Xavier Schepler < xavier.schep...@sciences-po.fr> wrote: Hi, I'm trying to highlight short text values. The field they came from has a type shared with other fields. I have highlighting working on other fields but not on this one. Why ? Thanks for your response. Here are some extracts from my schema.xml : words="french-stopwords.txt" ignoreCase="true"/> synonyms="test-synonyms.txt" ignoreCase="true" expand="true"/> Here's a field on which highlighting works : Here's the field on which it doesn't : They are kinda the same. But modalitiesLabelFr contains mostly short strings like : Côtes-d Armor Creuse Dordogne Doubs Drôme Eure Eure-et-Loir Finistère When matches are found in them, I get a list like this, with no text : The name attribute is the uid of the document. I tryed several values for hl.fragsize (0, 1, 2, ...) with no success at all.
Re: Field highlighting
It's really hard to provide any response with so little information, could you show us the difference between a field that works and one that doesn't? Especially the relevant schema.xml entries and the query that fails to highlight Erick On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 7:47 AM, Xavier Schepler < xavier.schep...@sciences-po.fr> wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to highlight short text values. The field they came from has a > type shared with other fields. I have highlighting working on other fields > but not on this one. > Why ? >
Field highlighting
Hi, I'm trying to highlight short text values. The field they came from has a type shared with other fields. I have highlighting working on other fields but not on this one. Why ?
