Re: Multi Core / On demand loading
Thanks, We run SOLR 4.0 in production. Yesterday, I ported our configuration to 4.1 on my local workstation. I just looked at the SOLR-4400 fix versions and as per the info, I might wait till 4.2 before porting. -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Multi-Core-On-demand-loading-tp4040341p4040498.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Multi Core / On demand loading
Almost forgot. Do be aware of https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4400. This came to light under an absurd load of opening/closing transient cores, which only means it won't show up until you go into production. The fix is on both trunk and 4x. On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 7:46 AM, Erick Erickson wrote: > I updated this page: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/CoreAdmin, look for > "transientCacheSize" and "loadOnStartup". Be aware that this is somewhat in > flux, but anything you find please report! > > Man, oh man, do I have a lot of documentation to do on all this once the > dust settles > > Erick > > > On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 5:10 PM, Vinay B, wrote: > >> Amongst the highlights for the SOLR 4.1 release, I see >> "Multi-core: On-demand core loading and LRU-based core unloading after >> reaching a user-specified maximum number." >> >> How is this configured and where should I be looking for a reference on >> this feature? >> >> Thanks >> > >
Re: Multi Core / On demand loading
I updated this page: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/CoreAdmin, look for "transientCacheSize" and "loadOnStartup". Be aware that this is somewhat in flux, but anything you find please report! Man, oh man, do I have a lot of documentation to do on all this once the dust settles Erick On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 5:10 PM, Vinay B, wrote: > Amongst the highlights for the SOLR 4.1 release, I see > "Multi-core: On-demand core loading and LRU-based core unloading after > reaching a user-specified maximum number." > > How is this configured and where should I be looking for a reference on > this feature? > > Thanks >