Re: Problem with verifying signature ?

2012-09-07 Thread Kiran Jayakumar
Thank you.

On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 9:51 AM, Chris Hostetter wrote:

>
> : gpg: Signature made 08/06/12 19:52:21 Pacific Daylight Time using RSA key
> : ID 322
> : D7ECA
> : gpg: Good signature from "Robert Muir (Code Signing Key) <
> rm...@apache.org>"
> : *gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!*
> : gpg:  There is no indication that the signature belongs to the
> : owner.
> : Primary key fingerprint: 6661 9BA3 C030 DD55 3625  1303 817A E1DD 322D
> 7ECA
> :
> : Is this acceptable ?
>
> I guess it depends on what you mean by acceptible?
>
> I'm not an expert on this, but as i understand it...
>
> gpg is telling you that it confirmed the signature matches a known key
> named "Robert Muir (Code Signing Key)" which is in your keyring, but that
> there is no certified level of trust association with that key.
>
> Key Trust is a personal thing, specific to you, your keyring, and how you
> got the keys you put in that ring.  if you trust that the KEYS file you
> downloaded from apache.org is legitimate, and that all the keys in it
> should be trusted, you can tell gpg that.  (using the "trust"
> interactive command when using --edit-key)
>
> Alternatively, you could tell gpg that you have a high level of trust in
> the key of some other person you have met personally -- ie: if you met Uwe
> at a confernce and he physically handed you his key on a USB drive -- and
> then if Uwe has signed Robert's key with his own (i think it has, not sure
> off the top of my head), then gpg would extend an implicit transitive
> trust to Robert's key...
>
> http://www.gnupg.org/gph/en/manual.html#AEN335
>
>
> -Hoss
>


Re: Problem with verifying signature ?

2012-09-06 Thread Chris Hostetter

: gpg: Signature made 08/06/12 19:52:21 Pacific Daylight Time using RSA key
: ID 322
: D7ECA
: gpg: Good signature from "Robert Muir (Code Signing Key) "
: *gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!*
: gpg:  There is no indication that the signature belongs to the
: owner.
: Primary key fingerprint: 6661 9BA3 C030 DD55 3625  1303 817A E1DD 322D 7ECA
: 
: Is this acceptable ?

I guess it depends on what you mean by acceptible?

I'm not an expert on this, but as i understand it...

gpg is telling you that it confirmed the signature matches a known key 
named "Robert Muir (Code Signing Key)" which is in your keyring, but that 
there is no certified level of trust association with that key.  

Key Trust is a personal thing, specific to you, your keyring, and how you 
got the keys you put in that ring.  if you trust that the KEYS file you 
downloaded from apache.org is legitimate, and that all the keys in it 
should be trusted, you can tell gpg that.  (using the "trust" 
interactive command when using --edit-key)

Alternatively, you could tell gpg that you have a high level of trust in 
the key of some other person you have met personally -- ie: if you met Uwe 
at a confernce and he physically handed you his key on a USB drive -- and 
then if Uwe has signed Robert's key with his own (i think it has, not sure 
off the top of my head), then gpg would extend an implicit transitive 
trust to Robert's key...

http://www.gnupg.org/gph/en/manual.html#AEN335


-Hoss


Re: Problem with verifying signature ?

2012-09-05 Thread Kiran Jayakumar
Thank you Hoss. I imported the KEYS file using *gpg --import KEYS.txt*.
Then I did the *--verify* again. This time I get an output like this:

gpg: Signature made 08/06/12 19:52:21 Pacific Daylight Time using RSA key
ID 322
D7ECA
gpg: Good signature from "Robert Muir (Code Signing Key) "
*gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!*
gpg:  There is no indication that the signature belongs to the
owner.
Primary key fingerprint: 6661 9BA3 C030 DD55 3625  1303 817A E1DD 322D 7ECA

Is this acceptable ?

Thanks

On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 5:38 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote:

> : I download solr 4.0 beta and the .asc file. I use gpg4win and type this
> in
> : the command line:
> :
> : >gpg --verify file.zip file.asc
> :
> : I get a message like this:
> :
> : *gpg: Can't check signature: No public key*
>
> you can verify the asc sig file using the public KEYS file hosted on the
> main apache download site (do not trust asc or KEYS from a download
> mirror, that defeats the point)
>
>
> https://www.apache.org/dist/lucene/solr/KEYS
>
>
>
> -Hoss
>


Re: Problem with verifying signature ?

2012-09-05 Thread Chris Hostetter
: I download solr 4.0 beta and the .asc file. I use gpg4win and type this in
: the command line:
: 
: >gpg --verify file.zip file.asc
: 
: I get a message like this:
: 
: *gpg: Can't check signature: No public key*

you can verify the asc sig file using the public KEYS file hosted on the 
main apache download site (do not trust asc or KEYS from a download 
mirror, that defeats the point)


https://www.apache.org/dist/lucene/solr/KEYS



-Hoss