Re: Query Logic Question
I think you're assuming that this is Boolean logic. It's not, see: http://www.lucidimagination.com/blog/2011/12/28/why-not-and-or-and-not/ Best Erick On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 9:27 AM, Rublex ruble...@hotmail.com wrote: Jack, Thank you the *:* solutions seems to work. -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Query-Logic-Question-tp3991689p3991881.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Query Logic Question
Jack, Thank you the *:* solutions seems to work. -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Query-Logic-Question-tp3991689p3991881.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Query Logic Question
Hi, Can someone explain to me please why these two queries return different results: 1. -PaymentType:Finance AND -PaymentType:Lease AND -PaymentType:Cash *(700 results)* 2. (-PaymentType:Finance AND -PaymentType:Lease) AND -PaymentType:Cash *(0 results)* Logically the two above queries should be return the same results no? Thank you -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Query-Logic-Question-tp3991689.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Query Logic Question
I think they are logically the same. but 1 may be a little bit faster than 2 On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 5:59 AM, Rublex ruble...@hotmail.com wrote: Hi, Can someone explain to me please why these two queries return different results: 1. -PaymentType:Finance AND -PaymentType:Lease AND -PaymentType:Cash *(700 results)* 2. (-PaymentType:Finance AND -PaymentType:Lease) AND -PaymentType:Cash *(0 results)* Logically the two above queries should be return the same results no? Thank you -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Query-Logic-Question-tp3991689.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Query Logic Question
It should work properly with the edismax query parser. The traditional lucene query parser is not smart enough about the fact that the Lucene BooleanQuery can't properly handle queries with only negative clauses. Put *:* in front of all your negative terms and you will get similar results. edismax does that automatically. (*:* -PaymentType:Finance AND *:* -PaymentType:Lease) AND *:* -PaymentType:Cash -- Jack Krupansky -Original Message- From: Rublex Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2012 4:59 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Query Logic Question Hi, Can someone explain to me please why these two queries return different results: 1. -PaymentType:Finance AND -PaymentType:Lease AND -PaymentType:Cash *(700 results)* 2. (-PaymentType:Finance AND -PaymentType:Lease) AND -PaymentType:Cash *(0 results)* Logically the two above queries should be return the same results no? Thank you -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Query-Logic-Question-tp3991689.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
