Thanks I think we'll go for extractOnly cause using a recent version of
Tika causes to many dependency issues.
On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 12:25 PM, Emir Arnautović <
emir.arnauto...@sematext.com> wrote:
> Hi Joris,
> I doubt that you can do that. That would require extracting request
> handler to support incremental updating and I don’t thing it does. In order
> to update existing doc, you would have to extract content and send it as
> incrementa update request.
> You can still use extracting handler to extract content by sending
> extractOnly=true and get extraction results in response, but maybe better
> to invoke Tika on client side.
>
> HTH,
> Emir
> --
> Monitoring - Log Management - Alerting - Anomaly Detection
> Solr & Elasticsearch Consulting Support Training - http://sematext.com/
>
>
>
> > On 1 Feb 2018, at 11:54, Joris De Smedt
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > I'd like to update a single field of an existing document with the
> content
> > of a file.
> > My current setup looks like this:
> >
> > final File file = new File("path to file");
> > ContentStreamUpdateRequest req = new
> > ContentStreamUpdateRequest("/update/extract");
> > req.addContentStream(new ContentStreamBase.FileStream(file));
> > req.setParam("literal.id", id);
> > req.setParam("uprefix","ignored_");
> > req.setParam("fmap.content", "content");
> > req.setParam("captureAttr","true");
> > req.setParam("lowernames","true");
> > solrClient.request(req, "collection");
> > solrClient.commit("collection");
> >
> > The problem with it is that it overwrites the existing file instead of
> > adding a content field.
> > Is there a way to solve this?
> > --
> > Joris De Smedt
>
>
--
Joris De Smedt
