Re: Recommendation for integration test framework

[Jan Morlock]

Hi kamaci,

sorry for the late reply. I did't mean to say that we are building Solr 
using Maven. I meant to say that we are currently working on our own 
project which uses the Solr jars and wars. This project is built using 
Maven.

BTW, we solved the original problem by using EmbeddedSolrServer in order 
to set up a Solr server inside our test cases. The tests are performed 
during the integration-test phase of the Maven lifecycle.

Best regards
Jan

Am 24.03.2013 23:14, schrieb kamaci [via Lucene]:
 Unrelated about your question you said that: We are utilizing Apache Maven
 as build management tool I think currently ant + ivy is build and
 dependency management tools, maven pom is generated  via plugin (If I am
 wrong you can correct it). Are there any plan to move the project based on
 Maven?

 2013/3/25 Jan Morlock [hidden email]
 /user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=4050937i=0

   Hi,
  
   our solr implementation consists of several cores sometimes interacting
   with
   each other. Using SolrTestCaseJ4 didn't work out for us. Instead we
 would
   like to test the resulting war from outside using integration tests.
 We are
   utilizing Apache Maven as build management tool. Therefore we are
 currently
   thinking about using the maven failsafe plugin.
   Does anybody have experiences with using it in combination with solr? Or
   does somebody have a better recommendation for us?
  
   Thank you very much in advance
   Jan
  
  
  
   --
   View this message in context:
  
 http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Recommendation-for-integration-test-framework-tp4050936.html
   Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
  


 
 If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion
 below:
 http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Recommendation-for-integration-test-framework-tp4050936p4050937.html

 To unsubscribe from Recommendation for integration test framework, click
 here
 http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_codenode=4050936code=amFuLm1vcmxvY2tAZ29vZ2xlbWFpbC5jb218NDA1MDkzNnwtMjA1NzMzMDg4Mw==.
 NAML
 http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewerid=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.namlbase=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespacebreadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml





--
View this message in context: 
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Recommendation-for-integration-test-framework-tp4050936p4060803.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Recommendation for integration test framework

[Furkan KAMACI]

Unrelated about your question you said that: We are utilizing Apache Maven
as build management tool I think currently ant + ivy is build and
dependency management tools, maven pom is generated  via plugin (If I am
wrong you can correct it). Are there any plan to move the project based on
Maven?

2013/3/25 Jan Morlock jan.morl...@googlemail.com

 Hi,

 our solr implementation consists of several cores sometimes interacting
 with
 each other. Using SolrTestCaseJ4 didn't work out for us. Instead we would
 like to test the resulting war from outside using integration tests. We are
 utilizing Apache Maven as build management tool. Therefore we are currently
 thinking about using the maven failsafe plugin.
 Does anybody have experiences with using it in combination with solr? Or
 does somebody have a better recommendation for us?

 Thank you very much in advance
 Jan



 --
 View this message in context:
 http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Recommendation-for-integration-test-framework-tp4050936.html
 Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.