RE: Solr and terracotta
Jeryl, I put your idea in our JIRA: http://jira.terracotta.org/jira/browse/CDV-399 --Orion Jeryl Cook wrote: > > had no problems with Terracotta, I got a good handle on the product.. > > Maybe you all at Terracotta could lead the implementation to patch SOLR > to allow it to use the RAMDirectory ( a setter) so terracotta can hook > into the RAMDirectory... > the way Terracotta handles clustering , > > Those of you who are not familiar with Terracotta, it clusters the JVM, > and uses a master server to help all the child servers to stay synced., > this approach will allow SOLR to be clustered very easily(indexing 1 node, > will index all nodes), not to mentioned the performance boost indexing,and > perhaps searching.Also it uses "virtual memory" , so the amount of > "documents" stored in the RAMDirectory is only limited to space. > > Jeryl Cook > /^\ Pharaoh /^\ > http://pharaohofkush.blogspot.com/ >> Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 14:46:19 -0700 >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org >> Subject: RE: Solr and terracotta >> >> >> Jeryl, >> >> I remember you asking about how to hook in the RAMDirectory a while back. >> It seemed like there was maybe some support within Solr that you needed. >> I >> assume you're suggesting adding an issue in the Solr JIRA, right? >> >> Is there something that the Terracotta team can do to help? >> >> Cheers, >> Orion >> >> >> Jeryl Cook wrote: >> > >> > tried it, didn't work that well...so I ended up making my own little >> > faceted Search engine directly using RAMDirectory and clustering it via >> > Terracotta...not as good as SOLR(smile), but it worked. >> > i actually posted some questions awhile back in trying to get it to >> work. >> > so terracotta can "hook" the RAMDirectory, maybe be good to submit this >> in >> > JIRA for terrocotta support! >> > >> > Jeryl Cook >> > /^\ Pharaoh /^\ >> > >> > >> > http://pharaohofkush.blogspot.com/ >> > >> > >> > >> > "..Act your age, and not your shoe size.." >> > >> > -Prince(1986) >> > >> >> Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 16:18:24 -0300 >> >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org >> >> Subject: Solr and terracotta >> >> >> >> Recently I ran into this topic. I googled it a little and didn't find >> >> much >> >> information. >> >> It would be great to have solr working with RAMDirectory and >> Terracotta. >> >> We >> >> could stop using crons for rsync, right? >> >> Has anyone tried that out? >> > >> > >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://www.nabble.com/Solr-and-terracotta-tf4313531.html#a12283537 >> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Solr-and-terracotta-tf4313531.html#a12354857 Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Solr and terracotta
I'm looking forward for this implementation! I think it'll be really great feature! Does anybody knows how long it takes terracotta sync a RAMDir? Can it be configured? What's the chance of commiting one document on server A and querying on server B that wasn't synchronized yet? On 8/27/07, Jeryl Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > had no problems with Terracotta, I got a good handle on the product.. > > Maybe you all at Terracotta could lead the implementation to patch SOLR > to allow it to use the RAMDirectory ( a setter) so terracotta can hook into > the RAMDirectory... > the way Terracotta handles clustering , > > Those of you who are not familiar with Terracotta, it clusters the JVM, > and uses a master server to help all the child servers to stay > synced., this approach will allow SOLR to be clustered very easily(indexing > 1 node, will index all nodes), not to mentioned the performance boost > indexing,and perhaps searching.Also it uses "virtual memory" , so the > amount of "documents" stored in the RAMDirectory is only limited to space. > > Jeryl Cook > /^\ Pharaoh /^\ > http://pharaohofkush.blogspot.com/ > > Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 14:46:19 -0700 > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > > Subject: RE: Solr and terracotta > > > > > > Jeryl, > > > > I remember you asking about how to hook in the RAMDirectory a while > back. > > It seemed like there was maybe some support within Solr that you > needed. I > > assume you're suggesting adding an issue in the Solr JIRA, right? > > > > Is there something that the Terracotta team can do to help? > > > > Cheers, > > Orion > > > > > > Jeryl Cook wrote: > > > > > > tried it, didn't work that well...so I ended up making my own little > > > faceted Search engine directly using RAMDirectory and clustering it > via > > > Terracotta...not as good as SOLR(smile), but it worked. > > > i actually posted some questions awhile back in trying to get it to > work. > > > so terracotta can "hook" the RAMDirectory, maybe be good to submit > this in > > > JIRA for terrocotta support! > > > > > > Jeryl Cook > > > /^\ Pharaoh /^\ > > > > > > > > > http://pharaohofkush.blogspot.com/ > > > > > > > > > > > > "..Act your age, and not your shoe size.." > > > > > > -Prince(1986) > > > > > >> Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 16:18:24 -0300 > > >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > > >> Subject: Solr and terracotta > > >> > > >> Recently I ran into this topic. I googled it a little and didn't find > > >> much > > >> information. > > >> It would be great to have solr working with RAMDirectory and > Terracotta. > > >> We > > >> could stop using crons for rsync, right? > > >> Has anyone tried that out? > > > > > > > > > > -- > > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/Solr-and-terracotta-tf4313531.html#a12283537 > > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > >
RE: Solr and terracotta
had no problems with Terracotta, I got a good handle on the product.. Maybe you all at Terracotta could lead the implementation to patch SOLR to allow it to use the RAMDirectory ( a setter) so terracotta can hook into the RAMDirectory... the way Terracotta handles clustering , Those of you who are not familiar with Terracotta, it clusters the JVM, and uses a master server to help all the child servers to stay synced., this approach will allow SOLR to be clustered very easily(indexing 1 node, will index all nodes), not to mentioned the performance boost indexing,and perhaps searching.Also it uses "virtual memory" , so the amount of "documents" stored in the RAMDirectory is only limited to space. Jeryl Cook /^\ Pharaoh /^\ http://pharaohofkush.blogspot.com/ > Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 14:46:19 -0700 > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: RE: Solr and terracotta > > > Jeryl, > > I remember you asking about how to hook in the RAMDirectory a while back. > It seemed like there was maybe some support within Solr that you needed. I > assume you're suggesting adding an issue in the Solr JIRA, right? > > Is there something that the Terracotta team can do to help? > > Cheers, > Orion > > > Jeryl Cook wrote: > > > > tried it, didn't work that well...so I ended up making my own little > > faceted Search engine directly using RAMDirectory and clustering it via > > Terracotta...not as good as SOLR(smile), but it worked. > > i actually posted some questions awhile back in trying to get it to work. > > so terracotta can "hook" the RAMDirectory, maybe be good to submit this in > > JIRA for terrocotta support! > > > > Jeryl Cook > > /^\ Pharaoh /^\ > > > > > > http://pharaohofkush.blogspot.com/ > > > > > > > > "..Act your age, and not your shoe size.." > > > > -Prince(1986) > > > >> Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 16:18:24 -0300 > >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > >> Subject: Solr and terracotta > >> > >> Recently I ran into this topic. I googled it a little and didn't find > >> much > >> information. > >> It would be great to have solr working with RAMDirectory and Terracotta. > >> We > >> could stop using crons for rsync, right? > >> Has anyone tried that out? > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/Solr-and-terracotta-tf4313531.html#a12283537 > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >
RE: Solr and terracotta
Note that Hoss was earlier calling for someone to submit an implementation of SolrDirectoryFactory... http://www.nabble.com/forum/ViewPost.jtp?post=12260989&framed=y Jon > -Original Message- > From: Jonathan Ariel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 23 August 2007 03:23 > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Re: Solr and terracotta > > If I am not wrong once you have the RAMDir feature mounting > Terracotta should be transparent and fast, right? > > On 8/22/07, Orion Letizi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Jeryl, > > > > I remember you asking about how to hook in the RAMDirectory > a while back. > > It seemed like there was maybe some support within Solr that you > > needed. I assume you're suggesting adding an issue in the > Solr JIRA, > > right? > > > > Is there something that the Terracotta team can do to help? > > > > Cheers, > > Orion > > > > > > Jeryl Cook wrote: > > > > > > tried it, didn't work that well...so I ended up making my > own little > > > faceted Search engine directly using RAMDirectory and > clustering it > > > via Terracotta...not as good as SOLR(smile), but it worked. > > > i actually posted some questions awhile back in trying to > get it to > > work. > > > so terracotta can "hook" the RAMDirectory, maybe be good > to submit > > > this > > in > > > JIRA for terrocotta support! > > > > > > Jeryl Cook > > > /^\ Pharaoh /^\ > > > > > > > > > http://pharaohofkush.blogspot.com/ > > > > > > > > > > > > "..Act your age, and not your shoe size.." > > > > > > -Prince(1986) > > > > > >> Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 16:18:24 -0300 > > >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > > >> Subject: Solr and terracotta > > >> > > >> Recently I ran into this topic. I googled it a little and didn't > > >> find much information. > > >> It would be great to have solr working with RAMDirectory and > > Terracotta. > > >> We > > >> could stop using crons for rsync, right? > > >> Has anyone tried that out? > > > > > > > > > > -- > > View this message in context: > > http://www.nabble.com/Solr-and-terracotta-tf4313531.html#a12283537 > > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > > >
Re: Solr and terracotta
If I am not wrong once you have the RAMDir feature mounting Terracotta should be transparent and fast, right? On 8/22/07, Orion Letizi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Jeryl, > > I remember you asking about how to hook in the RAMDirectory a while back. > It seemed like there was maybe some support within Solr that you > needed. I > assume you're suggesting adding an issue in the Solr JIRA, right? > > Is there something that the Terracotta team can do to help? > > Cheers, > Orion > > > Jeryl Cook wrote: > > > > tried it, didn't work that well...so I ended up making my own little > > faceted Search engine directly using RAMDirectory and clustering it via > > Terracotta...not as good as SOLR(smile), but it worked. > > i actually posted some questions awhile back in trying to get it to > work. > > so terracotta can "hook" the RAMDirectory, maybe be good to submit this > in > > JIRA for terrocotta support! > > > > Jeryl Cook > > /^\ Pharaoh /^\ > > > > > > http://pharaohofkush.blogspot.com/ > > > > > > > > "..Act your age, and not your shoe size.." > > > > -Prince(1986) > > > >> Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 16:18:24 -0300 > >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > >> Subject: Solr and terracotta > >> > >> Recently I ran into this topic. I googled it a little and didn't find > >> much > >> information. > >> It would be great to have solr working with RAMDirectory and > Terracotta. > >> We > >> could stop using crons for rsync, right? > >> Has anyone tried that out? > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/Solr-and-terracotta-tf4313531.html#a12283537 > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >
RE: Solr and terracotta
Jeryl, I remember you asking about how to hook in the RAMDirectory a while back. It seemed like there was maybe some support within Solr that you needed. I assume you're suggesting adding an issue in the Solr JIRA, right? Is there something that the Terracotta team can do to help? Cheers, Orion Jeryl Cook wrote: > > tried it, didn't work that well...so I ended up making my own little > faceted Search engine directly using RAMDirectory and clustering it via > Terracotta...not as good as SOLR(smile), but it worked. > i actually posted some questions awhile back in trying to get it to work. > so terracotta can "hook" the RAMDirectory, maybe be good to submit this in > JIRA for terrocotta support! > > Jeryl Cook > /^\ Pharaoh /^\ > > > http://pharaohofkush.blogspot.com/ > > > > "..Act your age, and not your shoe size.." > > -Prince(1986) > >> Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 16:18:24 -0300 >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org >> Subject: Solr and terracotta >> >> Recently I ran into this topic. I googled it a little and didn't find >> much >> information. >> It would be great to have solr working with RAMDirectory and Terracotta. >> We >> could stop using crons for rsync, right? >> Has anyone tried that out? > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Solr-and-terracotta-tf4313531.html#a12283537 Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Solr and terracotta
How come it didn't work? How did you add RAMDir support to solr? On 8/22/07, Jeryl Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > tried it, didn't work that well...so I ended up making my own little > faceted Search engine directly using RAMDirectory and clustering it via > Terracotta...not as good as SOLR(smile), but it worked. > i actually posted some questions awhile back in trying to get it to work. > so terracotta can "hook" the RAMDirectory, maybe be good to submit this in > JIRA for terrocotta support! > > Jeryl Cook > /^\ Pharaoh /^\ > > > http://pharaohofkush.blogspot.com/ > > > > "..Act your age, and not your shoe size.." > > -Prince(1986) > > > Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 16:18:24 -0300 > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > > Subject: Solr and terracotta > > > > Recently I ran into this topic. I googled it a little and didn't find > much > > information. > > It would be great to have solr working with RAMDirectory and Terracotta. > We > > could stop using crons for rsync, right? > > Has anyone tried that out? >
RE: Solr and terracotta
tried it, didn't work that well...so I ended up making my own little faceted Search engine directly using RAMDirectory and clustering it via Terracotta...not as good as SOLR(smile), but it worked. i actually posted some questions awhile back in trying to get it to work. so terracotta can "hook" the RAMDirectory, maybe be good to submit this in JIRA for terrocotta support! Jeryl Cook /^\ Pharaoh /^\ http://pharaohofkush.blogspot.com/ "..Act your age, and not your shoe size.." -Prince(1986) > Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 16:18:24 -0300 > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Solr and terracotta > > Recently I ran into this topic. I googled it a little and didn't find much > information. > It would be great to have solr working with RAMDirectory and Terracotta. We > could stop using crons for rsync, right? > Has anyone tried that out?
Solr and terracotta
Recently I ran into this topic. I googled it a little and didn't find much information. It would be great to have solr working with RAMDirectory and Terracotta. We could stop using crons for rsync, right? Has anyone tried that out?
