Re: massive memory consumption of grouping feature

2013-10-03 Thread Alok Bhandari
Did find any solution to this. I am also facing the same issue.



--
View this message in context: 
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/massive-memory-consumption-of-grouping-feature-tp4031895p4093297.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


Re: massive memory consumption of grouping feature

2013-10-03 Thread Furkan KAMACI
Hi Alok;

Please do not reply an old message at mail list. Users may not see the
question. Instead of that start a new thread and give a link to original
one.


2013/10/3 Alok Bhandari alokomprakashbhand...@gmail.com

 Did find any solution to this. I am also facing the same issue.



 --
 View this message in context:
 http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/massive-memory-consumption-of-grouping-feature-tp4031895p4093297.html
 Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.



Re: massive memory consumption of grouping feature

2013-01-10 Thread clawu01
Hi Otis,

thanks for your reply.
When I disable grouping, everything is fine!

Also, when I limit the rows to return with the rows= Parameter I don't run
into memory problems.
Since I still get the information about the hits:
int name=matches3793/int
int name=ngroups2175/int

I was wondering if the massive memory consumption arises in rendering the
response?

Regards,

Claas



--
View this message in context: 
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/massive-memory-consumption-of-grouping-feature-tp4031895p4032126.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


massive memory consumption of grouping feature

2013-01-09 Thread clawu01
Hello,

we are upgrading solr from 1.3 to 4.0.
In solr 1.3 we used the SOLR-236 patch to realize grouping/ field
collapsing.
We did not have a memory issue with the field collapsing feature in our 1.3
version.
However, we do now. The query looks something like this:

http://localhost:8983/solr/select?fl=*,scoregroup.ngroups=truegroup.limit=-1group.field=someGroupingFieldgroup=truefq=someField:someValuefq=anotherField:anotherValuewt=xmlfq=thirdField:[0+TO+1]rows=3

as you can see the q parameter is empty, but it does not make a difference
if I query for q=someValue+anotherValue

The result returns:
int name=matches3772/int
int name=ngroups2175/int

We have a memory consumption of about 4G. What causes this massive memory
consumption? How can it be reduced?

Regards,

Claas 



--
View this message in context: 
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/massive-memory-consumption-of-grouping-feature-tp4031895.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.