Re: performing a boolean query (OR) with a large number of terms
Hi, Also have a look at mm=0% acting as OR if you end up using dismax: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/ExtendedDisMax#mm_.28Minimum_.27Should.27_Match.29 Otis -- Solr ElasticSearch Support http://sematext.com/ On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 7:47 AM, Erick Erickson erickerick...@gmail.comwrote: No, you're pretty much on track. You can also just include the field multiple times if you want, itemModelNoExactMatchStr:123-4567 OR itemMOdelNoExactMatchStr:345-034985 But itemModelNoExactMatchStr:(123-4567 OR 345-034985) works just as well and is more compact. 15 terms is actually quite short by Solr standards, the default cap is 1024 boolean clauses, which you can change, it's just there to catch pathalogical (usually machine-generated) huge queries and make sure you consciously make a decision that it's OK. Best Erick On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 4:58 PM, geeky2 gee...@hotmail.com wrote: hello, environment: solr 3.5 i have a requirement to perform a boolean query (like the example below) with a large number of terms. the number of terms could be 15 or possibly larger. after looking over several theads and the smiley book - i think i just have include the parens and string all of the terms together with OR's i just want to make sure that i am not missing anything. is there a better or more efficient way of doing this? http://server:port /dir/core1/select?qt=modelItemNoSearchq=itemModelNoExactMatchStr:%285-100-NGRT7%20OR%205-10-10MS7%20OR%20404%29rows=30debugQuery=onrows=40 thx mark -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/performing-a-boolean-query-OR-with-a-large-number-of-terms-tp4032039.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: performing a boolean query (OR) with a large number of terms
No, you're pretty much on track. You can also just include the field multiple times if you want, itemModelNoExactMatchStr:123-4567 OR itemMOdelNoExactMatchStr:345-034985 But itemModelNoExactMatchStr:(123-4567 OR 345-034985) works just as well and is more compact. 15 terms is actually quite short by Solr standards, the default cap is 1024 boolean clauses, which you can change, it's just there to catch pathalogical (usually machine-generated) huge queries and make sure you consciously make a decision that it's OK. Best Erick On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 4:58 PM, geeky2 gee...@hotmail.com wrote: hello, environment: solr 3.5 i have a requirement to perform a boolean query (like the example below) with a large number of terms. the number of terms could be 15 or possibly larger. after looking over several theads and the smiley book - i think i just have include the parens and string all of the terms together with OR's i just want to make sure that i am not missing anything. is there a better or more efficient way of doing this? http://server:port /dir/core1/select?qt=modelItemNoSearchq=itemModelNoExactMatchStr:%285-100-NGRT7%20OR%205-10-10MS7%20OR%20404%29rows=30debugQuery=onrows=40 thx mark -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/performing-a-boolean-query-OR-with-a-large-number-of-terms-tp4032039.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
performing a boolean query (OR) with a large number of terms
hello, environment: solr 3.5 i have a requirement to perform a boolean query (like the example below) with a large number of terms. the number of terms could be 15 or possibly larger. after looking over several theads and the smiley book - i think i just have include the parens and string all of the terms together with OR's i just want to make sure that i am not missing anything. is there a better or more efficient way of doing this? http://server:port/dir/core1/select?qt=modelItemNoSearchq=itemModelNoExactMatchStr:%285-100-NGRT7%20OR%205-10-10MS7%20OR%20404%29rows=30debugQuery=onrows=40 thx mark -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/performing-a-boolean-query-OR-with-a-large-number-of-terms-tp4032039.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
