Re: set fq operator independently

[Dmitry Kan]

Hi Andreas,

You should be able to say:

(-organisations:[ TO *] -roles:[ TO *]) OR (+organisations:(150 42)
+roles:(174 72))

Study your queries with debuqQuery=true http parameter, at times this is
invaluable.

Dmitry


On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 2:54 AM, Andreas Owen a...@conx.ch wrote:

 i want to use the following in fq and i need to set the operator to OR. My
 q.op is AND but I need OR in fq. I have read about ofq but that is for
 putting OR between multiple fq. Can I set the operator for fq?

  (-organisations:[ TO *] -roles:[ TO *]) (+organisations:(150 42)
 +roles:(174 72))


 The statement should find all docs without organisations and roles or
 those that have at least one roles and organisations entry. these fields
 are multivalued.







-- 
Dmitry
Blog: http://dmitrykan.blogspot.com
Twitter: twitter.com/dmitrykan

Re: set fq operator independently

[Shawn Heisey]

On 3/4/2014 5:54 PM, Andreas Owen wrote:
 i want to use the following in fq and i need to set the operator to OR. My 
 q.op is AND but I need OR in fq. I have read about ofq but that is for 
 putting OR between multiple fq. Can I set the operator for fq?
 
  (-organisations:[ TO *] -roles:[ TO *]) (+organisations:(150 42) 
 +roles:(174 72))

For your fq parameter, use {!q.op=OR}X where X is your query.
The {!XXX} syntax is called a localparam.

You may find that the query won't work right even if you add that,
because you are using purely negative queries in your first two clauses.

The problem with purely negative queries is that you cannot subtract
from nothing -- you need to tell Solr what you are subtracting from,
which is usually all documents.  Sometimes Solr can figure out that it
needs to automatically add the *:*, but I am not sure which
circumstances will let it work and which won't.

If you find that it doesn't work, use something like the following:

(*:* -organisations:[* TO *] -roles:[* TO *]) (+organisations:(150 42)
+roles:(174 72))

Thanks,
Shawn

Re: set fq operator independently

[Mikhail Khludnev]

And if you need to cache OR legs separately, here is the workaround
http://blog.griddynamics.com/2014/01/segmented-filter-cache-in-solr.html


On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Shawn Heisey s...@elyograg.org wrote:

 On 3/4/2014 5:54 PM, Andreas Owen wrote:
  i want to use the following in fq and i need to set the operator to OR.
 My q.op is AND but I need OR in fq. I have read about ofq but that is for
 putting OR between multiple fq. Can I set the operator for fq?
 
   (-organisations:[ TO *] -roles:[ TO *]) (+organisations:(150
 42) +roles:(174 72))

 For your fq parameter, use {!q.op=OR}X where X is your query.
 The {!XXX} syntax is called a localparam.

 You may find that the query won't work right even if you add that,
 because you are using purely negative queries in your first two clauses.

 The problem with purely negative queries is that you cannot subtract
 from nothing -- you need to tell Solr what you are subtracting from,
 which is usually all documents.  Sometimes Solr can figure out that it
 needs to automatically add the *:*, but I am not sure which
 circumstances will let it work and which won't.

 If you find that it doesn't work, use something like the following:

 (*:* -organisations:[* TO *] -roles:[* TO *]) (+organisations:(150 42)
 +roles:(174 72))

 Thanks,
 Shawn




-- 
Sincerely yours
Mikhail Khludnev
Principal Engineer,
Grid Dynamics

http://www.griddynamics.com
 mkhlud...@griddynamics.com

set fq operator independently

[Andreas Owen]

i want to use the following in fq and i need to set the operator to OR. My q.op 
is AND but I need OR in fq. I have read about ofq but that is for putting OR 
between multiple fq. Can I set the operator for fq?

     (-organisations:[ TO *] -roles:[ TO *]) (+organisations:(150 42) 
+roles:(174 72))


The statement should find all docs without organisations and roles or those 
that have at least one roles and organisations entry. these fields are 
multivalued.