snappuller issue with multicore
Hi,
We are seeing a strange behavior with snappuller
We have 2 cores Hotel & Location
Here are the steps we perform
1. index hotel on master server
2. index location on master server
3. execute snapshooter for hotel core on master server
4. execute snapshooter for location core on master server
5. execute snappuller from slave machines (once for hotel core &
once for location core)
However, the hotel core snapshot is pulled into the location data dir.
Here are the commands that we execute in our ruby scripts
system('solr/multicore/hotel/bin/snappuller -P 18983 -S /solr/data -M
masterServer -D /solr/data/hotel ")
system("solr/multicore/location/bin/snappuller -P 18983 -M masterServer
-S /solr/data -D /solr/data/location")
Thanks,
Raghu
Re: snappuller issue with multicore
I notices that you are using the same rysncd port for both core. Do you
have a scripts.conf for each core?
Bill
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 11:40 PM, Kashyap, Raghu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> We are seeing a strange behavior with snappuller
>
>
>
> We have 2 cores Hotel & Location
>
>
>
> Here are the steps we perform
>
>
>
> 1. index hotel on master server
> 2. index location on master server
> 3. execute snapshooter for hotel core on master server
> 4. execute snapshooter for location core on master server
> 5. execute snappuller from slave machines (once for hotel core &
> once for location core)
>
>
>
> However, the hotel core snapshot is pulled into the location data dir.
>
>
>
> Here are the commands that we execute in our ruby scripts
>
>
>
> system('solr/multicore/hotel/bin/snappuller -P 18983 -S /solr/data -M
> masterServer -D /solr/data/hotel ")
>
> system("solr/multicore/location/bin/snappuller -P 18983 -M masterServer
> -S /solr/data -D /solr/data/location")
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Raghu
>
>
RE: snappuller issue with multicore
Bill,
Yes I do have scripts.conf for each core. However, all the options
needed for snappuller is specified in the command line itself (-D -S
etc...)
-Raghu
-Original Message-
From: Bill Au [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2008 9:17 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: snappuller issue with multicore
I notices that you are using the same rysncd port for both core. Do you
have a scripts.conf for each core?
Bill
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 11:40 PM, Kashyap, Raghu
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> We are seeing a strange behavior with snappuller
>
>
>
> We have 2 cores Hotel & Location
>
>
>
> Here are the steps we perform
>
>
>
> 1. index hotel on master server
> 2. index location on master server
> 3. execute snapshooter for hotel core on master server
> 4. execute snapshooter for location core on master server
> 5. execute snappuller from slave machines (once for hotel core &
> once for location core)
>
>
>
> However, the hotel core snapshot is pulled into the location data dir.
>
>
>
> Here are the commands that we execute in our ruby scripts
>
>
>
> system('solr/multicore/hotel/bin/snappuller -P 18983 -S /solr/data -M
> masterServer -D /solr/data/hotel ")
>
> system("solr/multicore/location/bin/snappuller -P 18983 -M
masterServer
> -S /solr/data -D /solr/data/location")
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Raghu
>
>
Re: snappuller issue with multicore
Try using the -d option with the snappuller so you can specify the
path to the directory holding index data on local machine.
Doug
On Dec 10, 2008, at 10:20 AM, Kashyap, Raghu wrote:
Bill,
Yes I do have scripts.conf for each core. However, all the options
needed for snappuller is specified in the command line itself (-D -S
etc...)
-Raghu
-Original Message-
From: Bill Au [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2008 9:17 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: snappuller issue with multicore
I notices that you are using the same rysncd port for both core. Do
you
have a scripts.conf for each core?
Bill
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 11:40 PM, Kashyap, Raghu
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
Hi,
We are seeing a strange behavior with snappuller
We have 2 cores Hotel & Location
Here are the steps we perform
1. index hotel on master server
2. index location on master server
3. execute snapshooter for hotel core on master server
4. execute snapshooter for location core on master server
5. execute snappuller from slave machines (once for hotel core &
once for location core)
However, the hotel core snapshot is pulled into the location data
dir.
Here are the commands that we execute in our ruby scripts
system('solr/multicore/hotel/bin/snappuller -P 18983 -S /solr/data -M
masterServer -D /solr/data/hotel ")
system("solr/multicore/location/bin/snappuller -P 18983 -M
masterServer
-S /solr/data -D /solr/data/location")
Thanks,
Raghu
RE: snappuller issue with multicore
Doug,
That doesn't help
-Raghu
-Original Message-
From: Doug Steigerwald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2008 9:35 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: snappuller issue with multicore
Try using the -d option with the snappuller so you can specify the
path to the directory holding index data on local machine.
Doug
On Dec 10, 2008, at 10:20 AM, Kashyap, Raghu wrote:
> Bill,
>
> Yes I do have scripts.conf for each core. However, all the options
> needed for snappuller is specified in the command line itself (-D -S
> etc...)
>
> -Raghu
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Bill Au [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2008 9:17 AM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: snappuller issue with multicore
>
> I notices that you are using the same rysncd port for both core. Do
> you
> have a scripts.conf for each core?
>
> Bill
>
> On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 11:40 PM, Kashyap, Raghu
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>>
>> We are seeing a strange behavior with snappuller
>>
>>
>>
>> We have 2 cores Hotel & Location
>>
>>
>>
>> Here are the steps we perform
>>
>>
>>
>> 1. index hotel on master server
>> 2. index location on master server
>> 3. execute snapshooter for hotel core on master server
>> 4. execute snapshooter for location core on master server
>> 5. execute snappuller from slave machines (once for hotel core &
>> once for location core)
>>
>>
>>
>> However, the hotel core snapshot is pulled into the location data
>> dir.
>>
>>
>>
>> Here are the commands that we execute in our ruby scripts
>>
>>
>>
>> system('solr/multicore/hotel/bin/snappuller -P 18983 -S /solr/data -M
>> masterServer -D /solr/data/hotel ")
>>
>> system("solr/multicore/location/bin/snappuller -P 18983 -M
> masterServer
>> -S /solr/data -D /solr/data/location")
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Raghu
>>
>>
RE: snappuller issue with multicore
Ok I think the problem is what Bill mentioned earlier. The rsync port
was the same for both the cores and due to which it was copying the same
snapshot for both the cores
Thanks for all the help
-Raghu
-Original Message-
From: Kashyap, Raghu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2008 10:27 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: snappuller issue with multicore
Doug,
That doesn't help
-Raghu
-Original Message-
From: Doug Steigerwald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2008 9:35 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: snappuller issue with multicore
Try using the -d option with the snappuller so you can specify the
path to the directory holding index data on local machine.
Doug
On Dec 10, 2008, at 10:20 AM, Kashyap, Raghu wrote:
> Bill,
>
> Yes I do have scripts.conf for each core. However, all the options
> needed for snappuller is specified in the command line itself (-D -S
> etc...)
>
> -Raghu
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Bill Au [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2008 9:17 AM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: snappuller issue with multicore
>
> I notices that you are using the same rysncd port for both core. Do
> you
> have a scripts.conf for each core?
>
> Bill
>
> On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 11:40 PM, Kashyap, Raghu
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>>
>> We are seeing a strange behavior with snappuller
>>
>>
>>
>> We have 2 cores Hotel & Location
>>
>>
>>
>> Here are the steps we perform
>>
>>
>>
>> 1. index hotel on master server
>> 2. index location on master server
>> 3. execute snapshooter for hotel core on master server
>> 4. execute snapshooter for location core on master server
>> 5. execute snappuller from slave machines (once for hotel core &
>> once for location core)
>>
>>
>>
>> However, the hotel core snapshot is pulled into the location data
>> dir.
>>
>>
>>
>> Here are the commands that we execute in our ruby scripts
>>
>>
>>
>> system('solr/multicore/hotel/bin/snappuller -P 18983 -S /solr/data -M
>> masterServer -D /solr/data/hotel ")
>>
>> system("solr/multicore/location/bin/snappuller -P 18983 -M
> masterServer
>> -S /solr/data -D /solr/data/location")
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Raghu
>>
>>
