Believe that story that was kill only 1500.
That is not a only lie but daze not coal four reality.
33000 TON OF WAR MATERIAL WAS DROP ON SERBIA END ONLY KILL 1500 IS A TOTAL LIE.
NORTH ATLANTIC TERRORIST ORGANIZATION IS NOW IN COMPLETE CONTROL OF SERBIA AND
THEY GIVING NUMBERS THAT IS ABSOLUTELY IDIOTIC STATEMENT
IF YOU DRIP 33000 TONS OF CORN SID ON Serbia YOU GOULD KILL MORE THEN THAT ,
YOU VENT LOCK FOUR CRIMINALS FOUR DESTRUCTION OF SERBIA LUCK FOUR FINANCIER Jew
THAT FINANCE ALL SHARED OF MASSACRING SERBS AND MISLED THE ALL WORLD.
That number would probably match Serbs that was murder by Albanians to sale
vital body organ to European friskily and mental people.
may god help you all bloody criminals when goes to final appearance front of
old mayday god.
----- Original Message -----
From: ANTIC.org-SNN
To: 'Balkan News' ; balkanr...@yahoogroups.com ; n...@antic.org ;
n...@siem.net ; Serbia ; 'SerbianNewsNetwork' ; sorabia@yahoogroups.com ;
'YUGO'
Cc: Global L ; stopn...@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, April 05, 2009 11:54 AM
Subject: [Yugoland] Don't mention the war 2009 1999 by Neil Clark
http://www.newstatesman.com/europe/2009/04/serbia-nato-international-war
Don't mention the war
Neil Clark
Published 02 April 2009
Observations on Serbia
Imagine if, ten years ago, your country had been bombed in
contravention of international law for 78 days and nights, leading to the death
or injury of more than 1,500 people, and that the reasons for the attack had
subsequently been exposed as fraudulent. You would reasonably expect your
government to mark the anniversary with a series of official events, and to
issue a strong denunciation of those who launched the aggression. But in
Serbia, the pro-western ruling elite seems more concerned about keeping the US
embassy onside than with commemorating the Nato bombing of ten years ago in an
appropriate fashion.
The biggest event to mark the anniversary was an international
conference, organised by the Belgrade Forum for a World of Equals, a
non-governmental organisation. Delegates from around the world attended,
including the former US attorney general Ramsey Clark and the Labour ex-MP
Alice Mahon. Yet Deputy Prime Minister Ivica Dacic was the only participant
from the Serbian government. His speech was one of the meeting’s most low-key.
On 24 March, a major anti-Nato rally was held in Belgrade’s main square, Trg
Republike. There were speakers from the US, Germany and Russia – but no input
from the Serbian government. The most it came up with was a commemorative
sitting of the cabinet, at which Prime Minister Mirko Cvetkovic declared that
the attack of ten years ago was “illegal, contrary to international law,
without a decision by the United Nations Security Council”. Those looking for a
more passionate denunciation of Nato actions from governing circles have been
disappointed.
The reality is that Serbia’s ruling elite are seeking to take the
country closer to the Nato fold. Serbia is to open its first diplomatic and
military mission at Nato headquarters in Brussels this summer, and military
manoeuvres involving soldiers from several Nato states will take place in
Serbia this autumn.
Such moves fly in the face of public opinion. “There is an overwhelming
majority of those among the Serbs who believe Serbia’s entering a Nato pact
would have been a bigger disgrace than if Jacqueline Kennedy had married Lee
Harvey Oswald,” Matija Beckovic, one of Serbia’s leading poets, told an
anti-Nato gathering late last month.
Meanwhile, pro-American politicians in Serbia continue to blame the
conflict of the late 1990s on the country itself and on Slobodan Milosevic,
then leader of the rump Yugoslavia. But a growing weight of evidence indicates
that the 1999 war had little to do with Milosevic, and everything to do with
the US’s economic and military hegemonic ambitions in the Balkans.
Lord Gilbert, the UK’s defence minister in 1999, has admitted that “the
terms put to Milosevic at Rambouillet [the international conference preceding
the war] were absolutely intolerable . . . it was quite deliberate”. In an
affidavit to the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia,
Colonel John Crosland, the UK’s military attaché in Belgrade from 1996-99,
stated that the US had decided on regime change in Serbia and had decided to
use the terrorist Kosovo Liberation Army to achieve that end. Last month, a
documentary on Serbian state television showed that the deaths of 40 people in
Racak in January 1999 resulted from a legitimate anti-KLA police action and
were only declared a “massacre” by the US Kosovo Verification mission to
justify Nato actions.
“The war was not Serbia’s fault, nor the fault of Slobodan Milosevic,”
Aleksandar Vucic, deputy leader of the Serbian Progressive Party, told me. “It
was the fault of those who did the bombing.” Such views may not go down well in
western corridors of power, but they undoubtedly chime with what most ordinary
Serbs think.
With the Serbian economy in free fall and pro-western factions likely
to pay the price in elections expected before the end of this year, it is
probable that future anniversaries of the Nato bombing will receive more
enthusiastic support from governing circles.
--
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
