Re: CVS commit: src/share/man/man7

2009-06-09 Thread Christoph Egger

 
Module Name:   src
Committed By:  cegger
Date:  Tue Jun  9 13:05:15 UTC 2009

Modified Files:
   src/share/man/man7: hier.7

Log Message:
X11R6 - X11R7
ok wiz@
 
 
 R6 is still valid for many ports.

When I back this out, then someone will comment,
many ports already switched to R7.

I hope, those ports will switch to R7 before NetBSD 6.0.

Christoph


re: CVS commit: src/share/man/man7

2009-06-09 Thread matthew green

   

   Module Name:src
   Committed By:   cegger
   Date:   Tue Jun  9 13:05:15 UTC 2009
   
   Modified Files:
   src/share/man/man7: hier.7
   
   Log Message:
   X11R6 - X11R7
   ok wiz@


R6 is still valid for many ports.
   
   When I back this out, then someone will comment,
   many ports already switched to R7.

who said back it out?  just fix it to be correct (ie, list both)
   
   I hope, those ports will switch to R7 before NetBSD 6.0.

me too.  want to help?


.mrg.


Re: CVS commit: [netbsd-5-0] src/external/mit/xorg/server/drivers/xf86-video-s3

2009-06-09 Thread Andreas Wrede


On Jun 9, 2009, at 13:26 , Soren Jacobsen wrote:


Module Name:src
Committed By:   snj
Date:   Tue Jun  9 17:26:27 UTC 2009

Modified Files:
src/external/mit/xorg/server/drivers/xf86-video-s3 [netbsd-5-0]:
Makefile

Log Message:
Apply patch (requested by ahoka in ticket #795):
Add missing object file to build a properly working s3 module.
Fixes PR xsrc/41206.



Did something go wrong here?

nbmake: /u2/netbsd-5.0/src/external/mit/xorg/server/drivers/xf86- 
video-s3/Makefile line 7: Unassociated shell command s3_Ti.c  
s3_Trio64DAC.c s3_video.c s3_accel.c \ 
nbmake: /u2/netbsd-5.0/src/external/mit/xorg/server/drivers/xf86- 
video-s3/Makefile line 8: Unassociated shell command  
s3_accel_newmmio.c
nbmake: /u2/netbsd-5.0/src/external/mit/xorg/server/drivers/xf86- 
video-s3/Makefile line 16: Unassociated shell command -I$ 
{X11SRCDIR.xf86-video-s3}/src


--
aew



Re: CVS commit: src/lib/libc/sys

2009-06-09 Thread YAMAMOTO Takashi
hi,

 On Tue, Jun 09, 2009 at 11:21:34AM +, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
 Log Message:
 don't bother to say that some advises are not implemented.
 ignoring them is a valid implementation.
 
 It should not be under BUGS, but it should still be documented.
 E.g. POSIX_FADV_NOREUSE would be very helpful for things like tar and cp
 to reduce buffer cache pressure.
 
 Joerg

i want to implement them if useful.
do you have any idea what an implementation of POSIX_FADV_NOREUSE
which is not a no-op would be like?

IMO, the use-once stream is a too common workload to require
an explicit hint.  the VM should just handle it nicely without hints.
i have to admit that i have no idea what NOREUSE hint can optimize it
further.

YAMAMOTO Takashi