Re: CVS commit: src/sys/kern
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 08:31:27AM +, Martin Husemann wrote: Modified Files: src/sys/kern: vfs_syscalls.c Log Message: add missing prototype shouldn't that be in a header file somewhere? -- David A. Holland dholl...@netbsd.org
Re: CVS commit: src/sys/kern
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 09:17:18AM +, David Holland wrote: On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 08:31:27AM +, Martin Husemann wrote: Modified Files: src/sys/kern: vfs_syscalls.c Log Message: add missing prototype shouldn't that be in a header file somewhere? Dunno - I just needed a quick build fix. Manu? Martin
Re: CVS commit: src/sys/kern
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 11:19:02AM +0200, Martin Husemann wrote: shouldn't that be in a header file somewhere? Dunno - I just needed a quick build fix. Manu? Yes, there was a missing header, I just fixed it (and rolled back the prototype in vfs_syscalls.c). -- Emmanuel Dreyfus m...@netbsd.org
Re: CVS commit: src
On Thu, 21 Jul 2011, matthew green wrote:
Module Name: src
Committed By: mrg
Date: Thu Jul 21 03:13:32 UTC 2011
Modified Files:
src/compat/amd64/i386: bsd.i386.mk
src/compat/mips64/64: bsd.64.mk
src/compat/mips64/o32: bsd.o32.mk
src/compat/sparc64/sparc: bsd.sparc.mk
src/distrib/sets/lists/base: ad.mips64eb ad.mips64el md.amd64
md.sparc64
src/distrib/sets/lists/comp: ad.mips64eb ad.mips64el md.amd64
md.sparc64 mi shl.mi
src/external/gpl3/gcc/usr.bin: Makefile.backend Makefile.inc
src/external/gpl3/gcc/usr.bin/cc1: Makefile
src/external/gpl3/gcc/usr.bin/cc1obj: Makefile
src/external/gpl3/gcc/usr.bin/cc1plus: Makefile
src/external/lgpl2/mpc/lib/libmpc: Makefile
src/external/lgpl3/gmp/lib/libgmp: Makefile
src/external/lgpl3/mpfr/lib/libmpfr: Makefile
src/lib: Makefile
Log Message:
build GMP, MPFR and MPC as private libraries just for GCC. don't
install the headers or librarys into the system.
in lib/Makefile should this really be
.if (${MKGCC} != no) ${HAVE_GCC} = 45
rather than
.if defined(HAVE_GCC) ${HAVE_GCC} = 45
?
I think that HAVE_GCC is always defined, these days..
iain
re: CVS commit: src
Log Message:
build GMP, MPFR and MPC as private libraries just for GCC. don't
install the headers or librarys into the system.
in lib/Makefile should this really be
.if (${MKGCC} != no) ${HAVE_GCC} = 45
rather than
.if defined(HAVE_GCC) ${HAVE_GCC} = 45
?
I think that HAVE_GCC is always defined, these days..
it should have both. we shouldn't rely on HAVE_GCC always
being defined. i thought it wasn't defined for pcc builds?
.mrg.
Re: CVS commit: src/external/bsd/mdocml
Could you please stop randomly changing 3rd party code without contacting the maintainer? Joerg On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 05:30:14AM -0400, Christos Zoulas wrote: Module Name: src Committed By: christos Date: Wed Aug 17 09:30:14 UTC 2011 Modified Files: src/external/bsd/mdocml/dist: mdoc_validate.c src/external/bsd/mdocml/lib/libmandoc: Makefile Log Message: fix cast warnings To generate a diff of this commit: cvs rdiff -u -r1.1.1.13 -r1.2 src/external/bsd/mdocml/dist/mdoc_validate.c cvs rdiff -u -r1.2 -r1.3 src/external/bsd/mdocml/lib/libmandoc/Makefile Please note that diffs are not public domain; they are subject to the copyright notices on the relevant files.
Re: CVS commit: src/usr.bin/unzip
Did you test this change for breaking compatibility with 3rd party scripts that parse the output of unzip? Joerg On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 09:37:40AM -0400, Christos Zoulas wrote: Module Name: src Committed By: christos Date: Wed Aug 17 13:37:40 UTC 2011 Modified Files: src/usr.bin/unzip: unzip.c Log Message: kill 2 digit year format. To generate a diff of this commit: cvs rdiff -u -r1.15 -r1.16 src/usr.bin/unzip/unzip.c Please note that diffs are not public domain; they are subject to the copyright notices on the relevant files.
Re: CVS commit: src/external/bsd/mdocml
In article 20110817212805.gb16...@britannica.bec.de, Joerg Sonnenberger jo...@britannica.bec.de wrote: Could you please stop randomly changing 3rd party code without contacting the maintainer? Unless the rules have changed, for simple compilation fixes we don't do that. Otherwise the overhead of doing so would be too large. In this particular case, do you have a different/better way of fixing this? If yes, I'd like to know now. christos
Re: CVS commit: src/usr.bin/unzip
In article 20110817212950.gc16...@britannica.bec.de, Joerg Sonnenberger jo...@britannica.bec.de wrote: Did you test this change for breaking compatibility with 3rd party scripts that parse the output of unzip? I thought about that, but where does one find such scripts? Providing a flag to make backwards compatible output is another way of doing it, but is it worth it? christos
Re: CVS commit: src/usr.bin/unzip
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 01:49:30AM +, Christos Zoulas wrote: In article 20110817212950.gc16...@britannica.bec.de, Joerg Sonnenberger jo...@britannica.bec.de wrote: Did you test this change for breaking compatibility with 3rd party scripts that parse the output of unzip? I thought about that, but where does one find such scripts? Providing a flag to make backwards compatible output is another way of doing it, but is it worth it? No, just back the change out because the output should look the same as the 'normal' unzip does. The change is nice but should not be done as long as the official unzip still use the old output. Bernd
