Re: CVS commit: src/libexec/rpc.rstatd
On Sun, Jun 08, 2014 at 01:17:26PM +, Christos Zoulas wrote: In article 20140608053602.ga5...@netbsd.org, David Holland dholland-sourcechan...@netbsd.org wrote: On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 05:40:05PM +, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: Modified Files: src/libexec/rpc.rstatd: rstat_proc.c Log Message: Remove !BSD and lint branches. Do we really want to zap the CSRG sccsids? They are part of the history. If someone is really interested in them, CVS still has the history. Otherwise they are basically just noise. Joerg removed the sccsids from sed too. This is not good because when we compare things with other BSD's we cannot tell if they came from the same origin or not. I'd put them back. They are ifdefed 0 anyway. They were not. Joerg
re: CVS commit: src/libexec/rpc.rstatd
Joerg Sonnenberger writes: On Sun, Jun 08, 2014 at 01:17:26PM +, Christos Zoulas wrote: In article 20140608053602.ga5...@netbsd.org, David Holland dholland-sourcechan...@netbsd.org wrote: On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 05:40:05PM +, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: Modified Files: src/libexec/rpc.rstatd: rstat_proc.c Log Message: Remove !BSD and lint branches. Do we really want to zap the CSRG sccsids? They are part of the history. If someone is really interested in them, CVS still has the history. Otherwise they are basically just noise. Joerg removed the sccsids from sed too. This is not good because when we compare things with other BSD's we cannot tell if they came from the same origin or not. I'd put them back. They are ifdefed 0 anyway. They were not. i like keeping them there. they should be #if 0'd but having the original lines is useful to me at least several times a year. .mrg.
