Re: Merge majors.{arm32,aarch64} into single file (Re: CVS commit: src/sys/arch/evbarm/conf)
> On Aug 18, 2018, at 5:02 PM, Rin Okuyama wrote: > > (1) rename majors.arm32 to majors.arm > (2) remove majors.aarch64 > (3) make everyone include majors.arm > > I will commit if there's no objection. Correct. Thank you for making this change. -- thorpej
Re: Merge majors.{arm32,aarch64} into single file (Re: CVS commit: src/sys/arch/evbarm/conf)
In article <27877.1534674...@splode.eterna.com.au>, matthew green wrote: >> OK. I will leave it as is for now. Please let me know if you >> remember the problems. > >try, and see? :-) > >if nothing else, please make them the same now, and add large >SHOUTING COMMENTS at the top to keep them in sync. Yes, please make them the same and whatever break we will fix. christos
re: Merge majors.{arm32,aarch64} into single file (Re: CVS commit: src/sys/arch/evbarm/conf)
> OK. I will leave it as is for now. Please let me know if you > remember the problems. try, and see? :-) if nothing else, please make them the same now, and add large SHOUTING COMMENTS at the top to keep them in sync. thanks. .mrg.
Re: Merge majors.{arm32,aarch64} into single file (Re: CVS commit: src/sys/arch/evbarm/conf)
On 2018/08/19 14:33, Nick Hudson wrote: ... On 19/08/2018 01:02, Rin Okuyama wrote: It seems harmless to add these devices in majors.aarch64. Therefore, I propose: (1) rename majors.arm32 to majors.arm (2) remove majors.aarch64 (3) make everyone include majors.arm I will commit if there's no objection. ... I support the goal of a single majors file for both arm and aarch64, but when I tried to do this I found problems in MAKEDEV generation or similar. I forget the exact details. OK. I will leave it as is for now. Please let me know if you remember the problems. Thanks, rin
Re: Merge majors.{arm32,aarch64} into single file (Re: CVS commit: src/sys/arch/evbarm/conf)
On 19/08/2018 01:02, Rin Okuyama wrote: Oops, I forgot to CC to source-changes-d@. [snip] On 2018/08/19 3:48, matthew green wrote: can't we make arm and arm64 use the identical majors file? please! Diff between majors.arm32 and aarch64 reads [snip] - ctcom was added by matt@ back in 2014, but no one uses it now - vchiq is a device of RPI, not still supported in aarch64 mode - zynquart is a device of Xilinx Zynq boards, whose 64bit models are not currently supported It seems harmless to add these devices in majors.aarch64. Therefore, I propose: (1) rename majors.arm32 to majors.arm (2) remove majors.aarch64 (3) make everyone include majors.arm I will commit if there's no objection. rin I support the goal of a single majors file for both arm and aarch64, but when I tried to do this I found problems in MAKEDEV generation or similar. I forget the exact details. Nick
Merge majors.{arm32,aarch64} into single file (Re: CVS commit: src/sys/arch/evbarm/conf)
Oops, I forgot to CC to source-changes-d@.
Forwarded Message
Subject: Merge majors.{arm32,aarch64} into single file (Re: CVS commit:
src/sys/arch/evbarm/conf)
To: matthew green
Cc: Jared McNeill , Nick Hudson , Ryo
Shimizu
From: Rin Okuyama
Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2018 08:57:53 +0900
On 2018/08/19 3:48, matthew green wrote:
can't we make arm and arm64 use the identical majors file?
please!
Diff between majors.arm32 and aarch64 reads
--- arm/conf/majors.arm32 2015-04-24 08:22:51.0 +0900
+++ aarch64/conf/majors.aarch64 2015-04-24 08:22:51.0 +0900
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-# $NetBSD: majors.arm32,v 1.37 2015/04/23 23:22:51 pgoyette Exp $
+# $NetBSD: majors.aarch64,v 1.2 2015/04/23 23:22:51 pgoyette Exp $
#
# Device majors for arm32
#
@@ -91,7 +91,6 @@
device-major irframe char 95 irframedrv
device-major cir char 96 cir
device-major radio char 97 radio
-device-major ctcom char 98 ctcom
device-major kttcp char 99 kttcp
device-major ixpcom char 100ixpcom
device-major sysmon char 101sysmon
@@ -105,8 +104,7 @@
device-major tslcd char 108tslcd
device-major twe char 109twe
device-major nsmbchar 110nsmb
-device-major vchiq char 111vchiq
-device-major zynquartchar 112zynquart
+#device-major vchiq char 111vchiq
# Majors up to 143 are reserved for machine-dependent drivers.
# New machine-independent driver majors are assigned in
- ctcom was added by matt@ back in 2014, but no one uses it now
- vchiq is a device of RPI, not still supported in aarch64 mode
- zynquart is a device of Xilinx Zynq boards, whose 64bit models are
not currently supported
It seems harmless to add these devices in majors.aarch64. Therefore,
I propose:
(1) rename majors.arm32 to majors.arm
(2) remove majors.aarch64
(3) make everyone include majors.arm
I will commit if there's no objection.
rin
