re: CVS commit: src/distrib/sets/lists/base
"Adam Ciarcinski" writes: > Module Name: src > Committed By: adam > Date: Tue Sep 8 13:01:47 UTC 2020 > > Modified Files: > src/distrib/sets/lists/base: shl.mi > > Log Message: > Restore libgomp, liblsan, and libstdc++ as GCC-only thank you. .mrg.
Re: CVS commit: src/distrib/sets/lists/base
Well, you can't have it both ways. Sent from Nine From: Valery Ushakov Sent: Tuesday, 2 June 2020 22:26 To: source-changes-d@NetBSD.org Cc: Roy Marples; Martin Husemann Subject: Re: CVS commit: src/distrib/sets/lists/base On Tue, Jun 02, 2020 at 19:15:15 +, Roy Marples wrote: > Module Name: src > Committed By: roy > Date: Tue Jun 2 19:15:15 UTC 2020 > > Modified Files: > src/distrib/sets/lists/base: mi > > Log Message: > dhcpcd: delete the obsolete chroot paths > > postinstall will take care of it. Will it? The build only does "fix obsolete" iirc, so if you did a build with old dhcpcd and then did an update build with new, the build will fail with extra files in destdir, I expect. -uwe
Re: CVS commit: src/distrib/sets/lists/base
On Tue, Jun 02, 2020 at 19:15:15 +, Roy Marples wrote: > Module Name: src > Committed By: roy > Date: Tue Jun 2 19:15:15 UTC 2020 > > Modified Files: > src/distrib/sets/lists/base: mi > > Log Message: > dhcpcd: delete the obsolete chroot paths > > postinstall will take care of it. Will it? The build only does "fix obsolete" iirc, so if you did a build with old dhcpcd and then did an update build with new, the build will fail with extra files in destdir, I expect. -uwe
Re: CVS commit: src/distrib/sets/lists/base
On 2019/07/01 13:08, Masanobu SAITOH wrote: > Hi. > > On 2019/07/01 7:15, Brett Lymn wrote: >> Module Name: src >> Committed By:blymn >> Date:Sun Jun 30 22:15:06 UTC 2019 >> >> Modified Files: >> src/distrib/sets/lists/base: shl.mi >> >> Log Message: >> Bump libcurses major and all dependent libraries. >> >> >> To generate a diff of this commit: >> cvs rdiff -u -r1.865 -r1.866 src/distrib/sets/lists/base/shl.mi >> >> Please note that diffs are not public domain; they are subject to the >> copyright notices on the relevant files. >> > > This changed libcurses.so from 7.2 to 8.2. > Is that a mistake of 8.0? > And also please add new libraries to distrib/sets/lists/debug/shl.mi See: http://releng.netbsd.org/cgi-bin/builds.cgi "Currently building tag: HEAD started at Sun Jun 30 23:35:01 UTC 2019 65 failed so far " On amd64: > === 8 extra files in DESTDIR = > Files in DESTDIR but missing from flist. > File is obsolete or flist is out of date ? > -- > ./usr/libdata/debug/usr/lib/i386/libcurses.so.8.2.debug > ./usr/libdata/debug/usr/lib/i386/libform.so.7.0.debug > ./usr/libdata/debug/usr/lib/i386/libmenu.so.7.0.debug > ./usr/libdata/debug/usr/lib/i386/libpanel.so.2.0.debug > ./usr/libdata/debug/usr/lib/libcurses.so.8.2.debug > ./usr/libdata/debug/usr/lib/libform.so.7.0.debug > ./usr/libdata/debug/usr/lib/libmenu.so.7.0.debug > ./usr/libdata/debug/usr/lib/libpanel.so.2.0.debug > = end of 8 extra files === > == 8 missing files in DESTDIR > Files in flist but missing from DESTDIR. > File wasn't installed ? > -- > ./usr/libdata/debug/usr/lib/i386/libcurses.so.7.2.debug > ./usr/libdata/debug/usr/lib/i386/libform.so.6.0.debug > ./usr/libdata/debug/usr/lib/i386/libmenu.so.6.0.debug > ./usr/libdata/debug/usr/lib/i386/libpanel.so.1.0.debug > ./usr/libdata/debug/usr/lib/libcurses.so.7.2.debug > ./usr/libdata/debug/usr/lib/libform.so.6.0.debug > ./usr/libdata/debug/usr/lib/libmenu.so.6.0.debug > ./usr/libdata/debug/usr/lib/libpanel.so.1.0.debug > end of 8 missing files == -- --- SAITOH Masanobu (msai...@execsw.org msai...@netbsd.org)
Re: CVS commit: src/distrib/sets/lists/base
Hi. On 2019/07/01 7:15, Brett Lymn wrote: > Module Name: src > Committed By: blymn > Date: Sun Jun 30 22:15:06 UTC 2019 > > Modified Files: > src/distrib/sets/lists/base: shl.mi > > Log Message: > Bump libcurses major and all dependent libraries. > > > To generate a diff of this commit: > cvs rdiff -u -r1.865 -r1.866 src/distrib/sets/lists/base/shl.mi > > Please note that diffs are not public domain; they are subject to the > copyright notices on the relevant files. > This changed libcurses.so from 7.2 to 8.2. Is that a mistake of 8.0? -- --- SAITOH Masanobu (msai...@execsw.org msai...@netbsd.org)
Re: CVS commit: src/distrib/sets/lists/base
In article 20120129011457.gb19...@netbsd.org, David Holland dholland-sourcechan...@netbsd.org wrote: On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 03:10:24PM +, Paul Goyette wrote: Modified Files: src/distrib/sets/lists/base: mi Log Message: Add new directories for trousers to sets lists. The directories get created even if they're not populated. Hello again, christos! howsabout we conditionalize that on MKTPM and default to no? Yes, this should default to not build. On the other hand there is the issue of mtree and the directories that caused this issue. christos
re: CVS commit: src/distrib/sets/lists/base
Module Name: src Committed By: christos Date: Fri Oct 14 15:48:50 UTC 2011 Modified Files: src/distrib/sets/lists/base: mi Log Message: fix sun2 build; mark lua shared object appropriately so that it is not required actually, this belongs in shl.mi.. where it doesn't need the pic marker. .mrg.
Re: CVS commit: src/distrib/sets/lists/base
Hi, Uh. Why is it in there anyway? Because NetBSD/amd64 and NetBSD/sparc64 provide 32 bit libraries for COMPAT_NETBSD32. Does it make sense to add an extra reminder line to all the libraries that are in the md.amd64 and md.sparc64 set lists? Something like: --- shlib_version.dist 2009-10-12 10:42:03.0 +0100 +++ shlib_version 2009-10-12 10:48:45.0 +0100 @@ -1,4 +1,5 @@ # $NetBSD: shlib_version,v 1.10 2009/10/10 18:06:54 bad Exp $ # Remember to update distrib/sets/lists/base/shl.* when changing +# Remember to update distrib/sets/lists/base/md.* when changing major=1 minor=1 Thanks, J -- My other computer also runs NetBSD/Sailing at Newbiggin http://www.netbsd.org// http://www.newbigginsailingclub.org/
Re: CVS commit: src/distrib/sets/lists/base
In article 20091012094941.gf2...@sirion.coris.org.uk, Julian Coleman j...@coris.org.uk wrote: Hi, Uh. Why is it in there anyway? Because NetBSD/amd64 and NetBSD/sparc64 provide 32 bit libraries for COMPAT_NETBSD32. Does it make sense to add an extra reminder line to all the libraries that are in the md.amd64 and md.sparc64 set lists? Something like: --- shlib_version.dist 2009-10-12 10:42:03.0 +0100 +++ shlib_version 2009-10-12 10:48:45.0 +0100 @@ -1,4 +1,5 @@ # $NetBSD: shlib_version,v 1.10 2009/10/10 18:06:54 bad Exp $ # Remember to update distrib/sets/lists/base/shl.* when changing +# Remember to update distrib/sets/lists/base/md.* when changing major=1 minor=1 I was thinking more in line of auto-generated md lists from a config file and the mi list. christos
Re: CVS commit: src/distrib/sets/lists/base
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 01:17:04PM +0200, Christoph Badura wrote: Uh. Why is it in there anyway? Because NetBSD/amd64 and NetBSD/sparc64 provide 32 bit libraries for COMPAT_NETBSD32. Kind regards -- Matthias Scheler http://zhadum.org.uk/
re: CVS commit: src/distrib/sets/lists/base
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 08:19:57AM +, matthew green wrote: src/distrib/sets/lists/base: md.amd64 md.sparc64 Log Message: libprop minor got bumped. HI BAD! Thanks! np. you aren't the first and won't be last for this type of problem :) Uh. Why is it in there anyway? the 32-bit versions of these libraries. .mrg.
